asterisk users - Aug 2005 - florz patch for bristuff breaks compile on x86_64?

After upgrading a CentOS 3.x box to CentOS 4.1 (both x86_64 with an 
Athlon64) I also wanted to get the latest bristuff. Unfortunately 
bristuff without florz causes the box to kernel panic within hours 
(console will complain about bad frame received something).

It seems however that the florz patch will not work for x86_64 arch. 
Bristuff -0.2.0-RC8j compiles fine without the florz patch, but after 
applying the patch zaphfc will not compile anymore (the patch applies 
cleanly).

Anyone managed to get bristuff with florz working on x86_64 arch?

Thanks!

On Wed, 17 Aug 2005, Remco Barende wrote:
> After upgrading a CentOS 3.x box to CentOS 4.1 (both x86_64 with an
Athlon64)
> I also wanted to get the latest bristuff. Unfortunately bristuff without 
> florz causes the box to kernel panic within hours (console will complain 
> about bad frame received something).
>
> It seems however that the florz patch will not work for x86_64 arch.
Bristuff
> -0.2.0-RC8j compiles fine without the florz patch, but after applying the 
> patch zaphfc will not compile anymore (the patch applies cleanly).
>
> Anyone managed to get bristuff with florz working on x86_64 arch?
>
> Thanks!

Sorry for replying to my own message, I forgot to include the error:

rm -f zaphfc.o *.ko *.mod.c *.mod.o .*o.cmd *~
rm -rf .tmp_versions
Link /usr/src/linux-2.6 to your kernel sources first!
make: *** [linux26] Error 1
install -D -m 644 zaphfc.ko /lib/modules/`uname -r`/misc/zaphfc.ko
install: cannot stat `zaphfc.ko': No such file or directory
make: *** [installlinux26] Error 1
****************************************************
hfc-pci driver installed.
Press <Enter> to continue, or <CTRL> + <C> to abort.
****************************************************



All other packages from bristuff compile fine after florz, just not 
zaphfc.

On Wed, 17 Aug 2005, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 06:57:19AM +0200, Remco Barende wrote:
>> After upgrading a CentOS 3.x box to CentOS 4.1 (both x86_64 with an
>> Athlon64) I also wanted to get the latest bristuff. Unfortunately
>> bristuff without florz causes the box to kernel panic within hours
>> (console will complain about bad frame received something).
>
> Then merge the fix into the bristuff patch if it has not been merged
> yet!
That's what I did when I patched bristuff :)
>> It seems however that the florz patch will not work for x86_64 arch.
>> Bristuff -0.2.0-RC8j compiles fine without the florz patch, but after
>> applying the patch zaphfc will not compile anymore (the patch applies
>> cleanly).
>
> Latest bristuff is RC8n, BTW. What exactly is the florz patch? It seems
> to have been onchanged since January or so.
I have never ever been able to keep a bristuffed box up for more than a 
few hours or 2 days at best without the florz patch. It seems that KPJ is 
trying various approaches to solve timing problems but I guess it's not 
stable yet.

Florz fixes a lot of timing issues, reduces interrupt load and makes 
bristuff stable.

You can find more info here:
http://zaphfc.florz.dyndns.org/

>> Anyone managed to get bristuff with florz working on x86_64 arch?
>
> It is part of the debian packages and they are built on amd64 as well.
>
> http://packages.debian.org/zaptel
> http://packages.debian.org/libpri
> http://packages.debian.org/asterisk
I would guess thet are without bristuff and/or florz?

Bristuff compiles without florz, but zaphfc doesn't after applying florz.