CentOS - Jun 2005 - CentOS VERY different than RHEL

Since we recently got a site agreement for RHEL at work, I have been
using it more. It seems that CentOS 4 and RHEL 4 are very different.
CentOS seems to come with newer packages and overall be a more polished
distro. This afternoon I will compare some packages and versions.
 
Is it just me?

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20050609/eef520c5/attachment-0004.html>

On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 14:47 -0500, Mark A. Lewis wrote:
> Since we recently got a site agreement for RHEL at work, I have been
> using it more. It seems that CentOS 4 and RHEL 4 are very different.
> CentOS seems to come with newer packages and overall be a more
> polished distro. This afternoon I will compare some packages and
> versions.
>  
> Is it just me?
> 
> -- 
CentOS has some newer packages in the CentOSPlus repo ... but if you
have all the updates and on extras / centosplus then they are the same.

(Except CentOS has yum/up2date for updates ... vice up2date only from
redhat)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL:
<http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20050609/0df77f72/attachment-0004.sig>