asterisk users - Nov 2004 - ^^4 problem with chan_unicall.c for Asterisk

Dear HO SIN,

many thanks for "L" solution you give me...

I have also libtiff troubles with RH9, how did you resolve them ?

R2 protocol I use work only with AB bits(CDbits ares fixed) and it run 
perfectely with the testcall.c, i'll try with chan_unicall and i'll give
you
the result...

*** GOOD luck Steve for updating the patch of last asterisk ***

thank you for your help

Kaws
>
>Message: 10
>Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2004 02:26:12 +0800
>From: Steve Underwood <steveu@coppice.org>
>Subject: Re: ^3 [Asterisk-Users] problem with chan_unicall.c for
>	MFC/R2 with	asterisk
>To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
>	<asterisk-users@lists.digium.com>
>Message-ID: <41A77544.2030300@coppice.org>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
>HO SIN wrote:
>
> > Dear Kaws, and Dear Steve,
> >
> > I think I am facing the same kind of trouble.  This kaws's case is
> > simple; one line inserted by patch designates wrong header file name
> > of "unical.h", therefore the objects are not compiled.   The
reality
> > is "unicall.h", and
>
>OK, fixed that one.
>
> > after modifying it, then I faced trouble that the compile does not go
> > through as some of Asterisk structure definition (for example,
> > ast_channel) seemed to have changed after around October version and
> > unicall.c could not compile properly.   In fact the latest version of
> > Asterisk does not compile with the current unicall.    I tracked back
> > to the version around late September.
>
>I am in the process of updating to the latest asterisk, but right now
>chan_unicall will only work with versions of * a month or more old.
>
> >
> > My environment is RH9, and resolved libtiff trouble, and the compile
> > finally went through, but it still does not operate properly (does not
> > understand line signalling - AB bits correctly).......hmmm
> >
>
>Which version of R2 are you using? Most use the ABCD bits in the same
>way. China and Thailand are different. The code should be allowing for
>those. It certainly works OK for China.
>
>Steve
>
_________________________________________________________________
MSN Actions Solidaires : volontaire ? l'?tranger 
http://www.msn.fr/actionssolidaires/Default.asp?Ath=f