I'm not sure where to put in my $.02 on this, but I think the best thing to do is pick a different name; I like "fresh". my $.02 of course, Mark
> I'm not sure where to put in my $.02 on this, but I think the best > thing to do is pick a different name; I like "fresh".Not to be militant, but "ssh" works just fine for me. IANAL. There are a few issues that make it look like the company SSH really doesn't have a leg to stand on. In my personal opinion, the term "SSH" has already been diluted. Anymore of my waxings are just preaching to the converted. -- john weaver -- jweaver at aens.net | Systems Administrator
Hi! I am sorry if I am senidng it an incorrect place. I heard about problems with ssh trademark. If it is not solve I propose name change to osh (Open Shell) or orsh (Open Remote Shell). There is no ssh included in name, yet names are short and similar to one used at the moment. Thank you for a great program!! Jacek
At 10:01 AM 2/17/2001, Jacek Pliszka wrote:>I am sorry if I am senidng it an incorrect place. > >I heard about problems with ssh trademark. If it is not solve >I propose name change to osh (Open Shell) or orsh (Open Remote Shell).You mean nobody can think of an acronym that spells T.A.T.U.? Terminal And.... hmmmm... --tal
On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, Tom Limoncelli wrote:> At 10:01 AM 2/17/2001, Jacek Pliszka wrote: > >I am sorry if I am senidng it an incorrect place. > > > >I heard about problems with ssh trademark. If it is not solve > >I propose name change to osh (Open Shell) or orsh (Open Remote Shell). > > You mean nobody can think of an acronym that spells T.A.T.U.? > > Terminal And.... hmmmm... >www.opentatu.com - Ben