rspec users - Nov 2010 - Puzzled about the rspec tests generated by Rails3

Hi all

I am puzzled about the rspec tests that are generated by Rails3
scaffolding. I am however not sure if this is the correct place to
discuss this issue.
It might be that a rails ML/chat is better suited for that kind of
discussion. It just depends on who is responsible for that code.
Somehow I am too stupid to find that out, so please bare with me if I
produced only noise here.

Cheers
Robert

-- 
The 1,000,000th fibonacci number contains ''42'' 2039 times;
that is
almost 30 occurrences more than expected (208988 digits).
N.B. The 42nd fibonacci number does not contain ''1000000'' that
is
almost the expected 3.0e-06 times.

On Nov 24, 2010, at 3:39 PM, Robert Dober wrote:
> Hi all
> 
> I am puzzled about the rspec tests that are generated by Rails3
> scaffolding. I am however not sure if this is the correct place to
> discuss this issue.
> It might be that a rails ML/chat is better suited for that kind of
> discussion. It just depends on who is responsible for that code.
> Somehow I am too stupid to find that out, so please bare with me if I
> produced only noise here.
When you run the scaffold generator, rspec-rails is responsible to generate the
specs. So this is the right place.

Cheers,
David
> Cheers
> Robert

On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 10:52 PM, David Chelimsky <dchelimsky at
gmail.com> wrote:
> On Nov 24, 2010, at 3:39 PM, Robert Dober wrote:
>
>> Hi all
>>
>> I am puzzled about the rspec tests that are generated by Rails3
>> scaffolding. I am however not sure if this is the correct place to
>> discuss this issue.
>> It might be that a rails ML/chat is better suited for that kind of
>> discussion. It just depends on who is responsible for that code.
>> Somehow I am too stupid to find that out, so please bare with me if I
>> produced only noise here.
>
> When you run the scaffold generator, rspec-rails is responsible to generate
the specs. So this is the right place.
It is terrible how biased one can be, by learning it comes from you I
looked at the code with new confidence and pretty much seem to
understand it now.

Sorry for the noise and thank you

Cheers
Robert
>
> Cheers,
> David
>
>> Cheers
>> Robert
>
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>


-- 
The 1,000,000th fibonacci number contains ''42'' 2039 times;
that is
almost 30 occurrences more than expected (208988 digits).
N.B. The 42nd fibonacci number does not contain ''1000000'' that
is
almost the expected 3.0e-06 times.