thr3ads.net - rspec users - [rspec-users] rspec 2 not cleaning up after examples run? [Jun 2010]

If this information is useful, please help other people find it:
Share via:

Timo Rößner

2010-Jun-28 15:00 UTC

[rspec-users] rspec 2 not cleaning up after examples run?

Hey guys,

I let the code speak for itself:

Below are my currently failing specs, please don''t pay too much
attention to the specs themselves, I just want to give you a "real
life example" of what''s happening - the only interesting thing
about
the specs is that there is a call to Factory(:challenge) in each of
them and a before-each-call putting out what''s currently in the
database:

  describe ''featuring'' do

    before(:each) do
      puts "Before Each:"
      puts "Featured Challenges size: #{Challenge.featured.size}"
      puts "Challenges count: #{Challenge.count}"
    end

    it ''should tell if a challenge is featured'' do
      challenge = Factory(:challenge, :feature_position => 1)
      challenge.should be_featured
    end

    it ''should tell if a challenge is not featured'' do
      challenge = Factory(:challenge, :feature_position => 0)
      challenge.should_not be_featured
    end

    it ''should feature a challenge'' do
      challenge = Factory(:challenge)
      challenge.feature!
      Challenge.featured.should == [challenge]
    end

    it ''should unfeature a challenge'' do
      challenge = Factory(:challenge, :feature_position => 1)
      challenge.unfeature!
      Challenge.featured.should be_empty
    end
  end

Now to the interesting part:

A spec run using rails 2.3.5 and rspec 1:

bundle exec spec spec/models/challenge_spec.rb
Before Each:
Featured Challenges size: 0
Challenges count: 0
.Before Each:
Featured Challenges size: 0
Challenges count: 0
.Before Each:
Featured Challenges size: 0
Challenges count: 0
.Before Each:
Featured Challenges size: 0
Challenges count: 0
..............................

-> Looks good.

Here''s the exact same spec run with rspec-2.0.0.beta.13 and
rails-3.0.0.beta4:

Before Each:
Featured Challenges size: 0
Challenges count: 0
Before Each:
Featured Challenges size: 1
Challenges count: 1
.Before Each:
Featured Challenges size: 1
Challenges count: 2
Before Each:
Featured Challenges size: 2
Challenges count: 3

So apparently the latest rspec doesn''t clean up after examples at all?

Is this a bug or a feature?

David Chelimsky

2010-Jun-28 15:03 UTC

head link

[rspec-users] rspec 2 not cleaning up after examples run?

On Jun 28, 2010, at 10:00 AM, Timo R??ner wrote:
> Hey guys,
> 
> I let the code speak for itself:
> 
> Below are my currently failing specs, please don''t pay too much
> attention to the specs themselves, I just want to give you a "real
> life example" of what''s happening - the only interesting
thing about
> the specs is that there is a call to Factory(:challenge) in each of
> them and a before-each-call putting out what''s currently in the
> database:
> 
>  describe ''featuring'' do
> 
>    before(:each) do
>      puts "Before Each:"
>      puts "Featured Challenges size: #{Challenge.featured.size}"
>      puts "Challenges count: #{Challenge.count}"
>    end
> 
>    it ''should tell if a challenge is featured'' do
>      challenge = Factory(:challenge, :feature_position => 1)
>      challenge.should be_featured
>    end
> 
>    it ''should tell if a challenge is not featured'' do
>      challenge = Factory(:challenge, :feature_position => 0)
>      challenge.should_not be_featured
>    end
> 
>    it ''should feature a challenge'' do
>      challenge = Factory(:challenge)
>      challenge.feature!
>      Challenge.featured.should == [challenge]
>    end
> 
>    it ''should unfeature a challenge'' do
>      challenge = Factory(:challenge, :feature_position => 1)
>      challenge.unfeature!
>      Challenge.featured.should be_empty
>    end
>  end
> 
> Now to the interesting part:
> 
> A spec run using rails 2.3.5 and rspec 1:
> 
> bundle exec spec spec/models/challenge_spec.rb
> Before Each:
> Featured Challenges size: 0
> Challenges count: 0
> .Before Each:
> Featured Challenges size: 0
> Challenges count: 0
> .Before Each:
> Featured Challenges size: 0
> Challenges count: 0
> .Before Each:
> Featured Challenges size: 0
> Challenges count: 0
> ..............................
> 
> -> Looks good.
> 
> Here''s the exact same spec run with rspec-2.0.0.beta.13 and
> rails-3.0.0.beta4:
> 
> Before Each:
> Featured Challenges size: 0
> Challenges count: 0
> Before Each:
> Featured Challenges size: 1
> Challenges count: 1
> .Before Each:
> Featured Challenges size: 1
> Challenges count: 2
> Before Each:
> Featured Challenges size: 2
> Challenges count: 3
> 
> So apparently the latest rspec doesn''t clean up after examples at
all?
> 
> Is this a bug or a feature?
Bug, but please check if it''s still true of beta.14.1.

Thx

Timo Rößner

2010-Jun-28 15:30 UTC

head link

[rspec-users] rspec 2 not cleaning up after examples run?

Hey David,

I just tried it out using the latest rspec and rspec-rails:

Gemfile:

  gem ''rspec'', ''2.0.0.beta.14''
  gem ''rspec-rails'', ''2.0.0.beta.14.1

$ bundle show rspec
~/.bundle/ruby/1.8/gems/rspec-2.0.0.beta.14

$bundle show rspec-rails
~/.bundle/ruby/1.8/gems/rspec-rails-2.0.0.beta.14.1

Unfortunately, the bug still exists when using this configuration:

Before Each:
Featured Challenges size: 0
Challenges count: 0
.Before Each:
Featured Challenges size: 1
Challenges count: 1
.Before Each:
Featured Challenges size: 1
Challenges count: 2
FBefore Each:
Featured Challenges size: 2
Challenges count: 3


On Jun 28, 5:03?pm, David Chelimsky <dchelim... at gmail.com>
wrote:> On Jun 28, 2010, at 10:00 AM, Timo R??ner wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hey guys,
>
> > I let the code speak for itself:
>
> > Below are my currently failing specs, please don''t pay too
much
> > attention to the specs themselves, I just want to give you a
"real
> > life example" of what''s happening - the only interesting
thing about
> > the specs is that there is a call to Factory(:challenge) in each of
> > them and a before-each-call putting out what''s currently in
the
> > database:
>
> > ?describe ''featuring'' do
>
> > ? ?before(:each) do
> > ? ? ?puts "Before Each:"
> > ? ? ?puts "Featured Challenges size:
#{Challenge.featured.size}"
> > ? ? ?puts "Challenges count: #{Challenge.count}"
> > ? ?end
>
> > ? ?it ''should tell if a challenge is featured'' do
> > ? ? ?challenge = Factory(:challenge, :feature_position => 1)
> > ? ? ?challenge.should be_featured
> > ? ?end
>
> > ? ?it ''should tell if a challenge is not featured''
do
> > ? ? ?challenge = Factory(:challenge, :feature_position => 0)
> > ? ? ?challenge.should_not be_featured
> > ? ?end
>
> > ? ?it ''should feature a challenge'' do
> > ? ? ?challenge = Factory(:challenge)
> > ? ? ?challenge.feature!
> > ? ? ?Challenge.featured.should == [challenge]
> > ? ?end
>
> > ? ?it ''should unfeature a challenge'' do
> > ? ? ?challenge = Factory(:challenge, :feature_position => 1)
> > ? ? ?challenge.unfeature!
> > ? ? ?Challenge.featured.should be_empty
> > ? ?end
> > ?end
>
> > Now to the interesting part:
>
> > A spec run using rails 2.3.5 and rspec 1:
>
> > bundle exec spec spec/models/challenge_spec.rb
> > Before Each:
> > Featured Challenges size: 0
> > Challenges count: 0
> > .Before Each:
> > Featured Challenges size: 0
> > Challenges count: 0
> > .Before Each:
> > Featured Challenges size: 0
> > Challenges count: 0
> > .Before Each:
> > Featured Challenges size: 0
> > Challenges count: 0
> > ..............................
>
> > -> Looks good.
>
> > Here''s the exact same spec run with rspec-2.0.0.beta.13 and
> > rails-3.0.0.beta4:
>
> > Before Each:
> > Featured Challenges size: 0
> > Challenges count: 0
> > Before Each:
> > Featured Challenges size: 1
> > Challenges count: 1
> > .Before Each:
> > Featured Challenges size: 1
> > Challenges count: 2
> > Before Each:
> > Featured Challenges size: 2
> > Challenges count: 3
>
> > So apparently the latest rspec doesn''t clean up after
examples at all?
>
> > Is this a bug or a feature?
>
> Bug, but please check if it''s still true of beta.14.1.
>
> Thx
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-us... at
rubyforge.orghttp://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users

David Chelimsky

2010-Jun-28 15:35 UTC

head link

[rspec-users] rspec 2 not cleaning up after examples run?

On Jun 28, 2010, at 10:30 AM, Timo R??ner wrote:
> On Jun 28, 5:03 pm, David Chelimsky <dchelim... at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Jun 28, 2010, at 10:00 AM, Timo R??ner wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> Hey guys,
>> 
>>> I let the code speak for itself:
>> 
>>> Below are my currently failing specs, please don''t pay too
much
>>> attention to the specs themselves, I just want to give you a
"real
>>> life example" of what''s happening - the only
interesting thing about
>>> the specs is that there is a call to Factory(:challenge) in each of
>>> them and a before-each-call putting out what''s currently
in the
>>> database:
>> 
>>>  describe ''featuring'' do
>> 
>>>    before(:each) do
>>>      puts "Before Each:"
>>>      puts "Featured Challenges size:
#{Challenge.featured.size}"
>>>      puts "Challenges count: #{Challenge.count}"
>>>    end
>> 
>>>    it ''should tell if a challenge is featured'' do
>>>      challenge = Factory(:challenge, :feature_position => 1)
>>>      challenge.should be_featured
>>>    end
>> 
>>>    it ''should tell if a challenge is not
featured'' do
>>>      challenge = Factory(:challenge, :feature_position => 0)
>>>      challenge.should_not be_featured
>>>    end
>> 
>>>    it ''should feature a challenge'' do
>>>      challenge = Factory(:challenge)
>>>      challenge.feature!
>>>      Challenge.featured.should == [challenge]
>>>    end
>> 
>>>    it ''should unfeature a challenge'' do
>>>      challenge = Factory(:challenge, :feature_position => 1)
>>>      challenge.unfeature!
>>>      Challenge.featured.should be_empty
>>>    end
>>>  end
>> 
>>> Now to the interesting part:
>> 
>>> A spec run using rails 2.3.5 and rspec 1:
>> 
>>> bundle exec spec spec/models/challenge_spec.rb
>>> Before Each:
>>> Featured Challenges size: 0
>>> Challenges count: 0
>>> .Before Each:
>>> Featured Challenges size: 0
>>> Challenges count: 0
>>> .Before Each:
>>> Featured Challenges size: 0
>>> Challenges count: 0
>>> .Before Each:
>>> Featured Challenges size: 0
>>> Challenges count: 0
>>> ..............................
>> 
>>> -> Looks good.
>> 
>>> Here''s the exact same spec run with rspec-2.0.0.beta.13
and
>>> rails-3.0.0.beta4:
>> 
>>> Before Each:
>>> Featured Challenges size: 0
>>> Challenges count: 0
>>> Before Each:
>>> Featured Challenges size: 1
>>> Challenges count: 1
>>> .Before Each:
>>> Featured Challenges size: 1
>>> Challenges count: 2
>>> Before Each:
>>> Featured Challenges size: 2
>>> Challenges count: 3
>> 
>>> So apparently the latest rspec doesn''t clean up after
examples at all?
>> 
>>> Is this a bug or a feature?
>> 
>> Bug, but please check if it''s still true of beta.14.1.
>> 
> Hey David,
> 
> I just tried it out using the latest rspec and rspec-rails:
> 
> Gemfile:
> 
>  gem ''rspec'', ''2.0.0.beta.14''
>  gem ''rspec-rails'', ''2.0.0.beta.14.1
> 
> $ bundle show rspec
> ~/.bundle/ruby/1.8/gems/rspec-2.0.0.beta.14
> 
> $bundle show rspec-rails
> ~/.bundle/ruby/1.8/gems/rspec-rails-2.0.0.beta.14.1
> 
> Unfortunately, the bug still exists when using this configuration:
> 
> Before Each:
> Featured Challenges size: 0
> Challenges count: 0
> .Before Each:
> Featured Challenges size: 1
> Challenges count: 1
> .Before Each:
> Featured Challenges size: 1
> Challenges count: 2
> FBefore Each:
> Featured Challenges size: 2
> Challenges count: 3
What''s in your Gemfile and spec/spec_helper.rb?

ps - please post in-line or at the bottom so we can follow the thread.

Timo Rößner

2010-Jun-29 07:50 UTC

head link

[rspec-users] rspec 2 not cleaning up after examples run?

Hi David,

Gemfile and spec/spec_helper (not sure what you mean with "in-line
posting"? I hope it''s ok like that, if not, let me know):

-> http://gist.github.com/456941

On Jun 28, 5:35?pm, David Chelimsky <dchelim... at gmail.com>
wrote:> On Jun 28, 2010, at 10:30 AM, Timo R??ner wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jun 28, 5:03 pm, David Chelimsky <dchelim... at gmail.com>
wrote:
> >> On Jun 28, 2010, at 10:00 AM, Timo R??ner wrote:
>
> >>> Hey guys,
>
> >>> I let the code speak for itself:
>
> >>> Below are my currently failing specs, please don''t
pay too much
> >>> attention to the specs themselves, I just want to give you a
"real
> >>> life example" of what''s happening - the only
interesting thing about
> >>> the specs is that there is a call to Factory(:challenge) in
each of
> >>> them and a before-each-call putting out what''s
currently in the
> >>> database:
>
> >>> ?describe ''featuring'' do
>
> >>> ? ?before(:each) do
> >>> ? ? ?puts "Before Each:"
> >>> ? ? ?puts "Featured Challenges size:
#{Challenge.featured.size}"
> >>> ? ? ?puts "Challenges count: #{Challenge.count}"
> >>> ? ?end
>
> >>> ? ?it ''should tell if a challenge is
featured'' do
> >>> ? ? ?challenge = Factory(:challenge, :feature_position =>
1)
> >>> ? ? ?challenge.should be_featured
> >>> ? ?end
>
> >>> ? ?it ''should tell if a challenge is not
featured'' do
> >>> ? ? ?challenge = Factory(:challenge, :feature_position =>
0)
> >>> ? ? ?challenge.should_not be_featured
> >>> ? ?end
>
> >>> ? ?it ''should feature a challenge'' do
> >>> ? ? ?challenge = Factory(:challenge)
> >>> ? ? ?challenge.feature!
> >>> ? ? ?Challenge.featured.should == [challenge]
> >>> ? ?end
>
> >>> ? ?it ''should unfeature a challenge'' do
> >>> ? ? ?challenge = Factory(:challenge, :feature_position =>
1)
> >>> ? ? ?challenge.unfeature!
> >>> ? ? ?Challenge.featured.should be_empty
> >>> ? ?end
> >>> ?end
>
> >>> Now to the interesting part:
>
> >>> A spec run using rails 2.3.5 and rspec 1:
>
> >>> bundle exec spec spec/models/challenge_spec.rb
> >>> Before Each:
> >>> Featured Challenges size: 0
> >>> Challenges count: 0
> >>> .Before Each:
> >>> Featured Challenges size: 0
> >>> Challenges count: 0
> >>> .Before Each:
> >>> Featured Challenges size: 0
> >>> Challenges count: 0
> >>> .Before Each:
> >>> Featured Challenges size: 0
> >>> Challenges count: 0
> >>> ..............................
>
> >>> -> Looks good.
>
> >>> Here''s the exact same spec run with
rspec-2.0.0.beta.13 and
> >>> rails-3.0.0.beta4:
>
> >>> Before Each:
> >>> Featured Challenges size: 0
> >>> Challenges count: 0
> >>> Before Each:
> >>> Featured Challenges size: 1
> >>> Challenges count: 1
> >>> .Before Each:
> >>> Featured Challenges size: 1
> >>> Challenges count: 2
> >>> Before Each:
> >>> Featured Challenges size: 2
> >>> Challenges count: 3
>
> >>> So apparently the latest rspec doesn''t clean up after
examples at all?
>
> >>> Is this a bug or a feature?
>
> >> Bug, but please check if it''s still true of beta.14.1.
>
> > Hey David,
>
> > I just tried it out using the latest rspec and rspec-rails:
>
> > Gemfile:
>
> > ?gem ''rspec'', ''2.0.0.beta.14''
> > ?gem ''rspec-rails'', ''2.0.0.beta.14.1
>
> > $ bundle show rspec
> > ~/.bundle/ruby/1.8/gems/rspec-2.0.0.beta.14
>
> > $bundle show rspec-rails
> > ~/.bundle/ruby/1.8/gems/rspec-rails-2.0.0.beta.14.1
>
> > Unfortunately, the bug still exists when using this configuration:
>
> > Before Each:
> > Featured Challenges size: 0
> > Challenges count: 0
> > .Before Each:
> > Featured Challenges size: 1
> > Challenges count: 1
> > .Before Each:
> > Featured Challenges size: 1
> > Challenges count: 2
> > FBefore Each:
> > Featured Challenges size: 2
> > Challenges count: 3
>
> What''s in your Gemfile and spec/spec_helper.rb?
>
> ps - please post in-line or at the bottom so we can follow the thread.
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-us... at
rubyforge.orghttp://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users

Wincent Colaiuta

2010-Jun-29 07:55 UTC

head link

[rspec-users] rspec 2 not cleaning up after examples run?

El 29/06/2010, a las 09:50, Timo R??ner escribi?:
> Hi David,
> 
> Gemfile and spec/spec_helper (not sure what you mean with "in-line
> posting"? I hope it''s ok like that, if not, let me know):
He means, don''t top-post.

http://idallen.com/topposting.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Top-posting

Cheers,
Wincent

David Chelimsky

2010-Jun-29 10:14 UTC

head link

[rspec-users] rspec 2 not cleaning up after examples run?

On Jun 29, 2010, at 2:50 AM, Timo R??ner wrote:
> On Jun 28, 5:35 pm, David Chelimsky <dchelim... at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Jun 28, 2010, at 10:30 AM, Timo R??ner wrote:
>>> On Jun 28, 5:03 pm, David Chelimsky <dchelim... at gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>> On Jun 28, 2010, at 10:00 AM, Timo R??ner wrote:
>> 
>>>>> Hey guys,
>> 
>>>>> I let the code speak for itself:
>> 
>>>>> Below are my currently failing specs, please don''t
pay too much
>>>>> attention to the specs themselves, I just want to give you
a "real
>>>>> life example" of what''s happening - the only
interesting thing about
>>>>> the specs is that there is a call to Factory(:challenge) in
each of
>>>>> them and a before-each-call putting out what''s
currently in the
>>>>> database:
>> 
>>>>>  describe ''featuring'' do
>> 
>>>>>    before(:each) do
>>>>>      puts "Before Each:"
>>>>>      puts "Featured Challenges size:
#{Challenge.featured.size}"
>>>>>      puts "Challenges count: #{Challenge.count}"
>>>>>    end
>> 
>>>>>    it ''should tell if a challenge is
featured'' do
>>>>>      challenge = Factory(:challenge, :feature_position
=> 1)
>>>>>      challenge.should be_featured
>>>>>    end
>> 
>>>>>    it ''should tell if a challenge is not
featured'' do
>>>>>      challenge = Factory(:challenge, :feature_position
=> 0)
>>>>>      challenge.should_not be_featured
>>>>>    end
>> 
>>>>>    it ''should feature a challenge'' do
>>>>>      challenge = Factory(:challenge)
>>>>>      challenge.feature!
>>>>>      Challenge.featured.should == [challenge]
>>>>>    end
>> 
>>>>>    it ''should unfeature a challenge'' do
>>>>>      challenge = Factory(:challenge, :feature_position
=> 1)
>>>>>      challenge.unfeature!
>>>>>      Challenge.featured.should be_empty
>>>>>    end
>>>>>  end
>> 
>>>>> Now to the interesting part:
>> 
>>>>> A spec run using rails 2.3.5 and rspec 1:
>> 
>>>>> bundle exec spec spec/models/challenge_spec.rb
>>>>> Before Each:
>>>>> Featured Challenges size: 0
>>>>> Challenges count: 0
>>>>> .Before Each:
>>>>> Featured Challenges size: 0
>>>>> Challenges count: 0
>>>>> .Before Each:
>>>>> Featured Challenges size: 0
>>>>> Challenges count: 0
>>>>> .Before Each:
>>>>> Featured Challenges size: 0
>>>>> Challenges count: 0
>>>>> ..............................
>> 
>>>>> -> Looks good.
>> 
>>>>> Here''s the exact same spec run with
rspec-2.0.0.beta.13 and
>>>>> rails-3.0.0.beta4:
>> 
>>>>> Before Each:
>>>>> Featured Challenges size: 0
>>>>> Challenges count: 0
>>>>> Before Each:
>>>>> Featured Challenges size: 1
>>>>> Challenges count: 1
>>>>> .Before Each:
>>>>> Featured Challenges size: 1
>>>>> Challenges count: 2
>>>>> Before Each:
>>>>> Featured Challenges size: 2
>>>>> Challenges count: 3
>> 
>>>>> So apparently the latest rspec doesn''t clean up
after examples at all?
>> 
>>>>> Is this a bug or a feature?
>> 
>>>> Bug, but please check if it''s still true of beta.14.1.
>> 
>>> Hey David,
>> 
>>> I just tried it out using the latest rspec and rspec-rails:
>> 
>>> Gemfile:
>> 
>>>  gem ''rspec'', ''2.0.0.beta.14''
>>>  gem ''rspec-rails'', ''2.0.0.beta.14.1
>> 
>>> $ bundle show rspec
>>> ~/.bundle/ruby/1.8/gems/rspec-2.0.0.beta.14
>> 
>>> $bundle show rspec-rails
>>> ~/.bundle/ruby/1.8/gems/rspec-rails-2.0.0.beta.14.1
>> 
>>> Unfortunately, the bug still exists when using this configuration:
>> 
>>> Before Each:
>>> Featured Challenges size: 0
>>> Challenges count: 0
>>> .Before Each:
>>> Featured Challenges size: 1
>>> Challenges count: 1
>>> .Before Each:
>>> Featured Challenges size: 1
>>> Challenges count: 2
>>> FBefore Each:
>>> Featured Challenges size: 2
>>> Challenges count: 3
>> 
>> What''s in your Gemfile and spec/spec_helper.rb?
>> 
>> ps - please post in-line or at the bottom so we can follow the thread.
> Hi David,
> 
> -> http://gist.github.com/456941
I forked and made a couple of changes: http://gist.github.com/457034

* Added :development to the group declaration on line 31
* Changed rspec-rails to beta.14.2
* Removed the rspec declaration (it''s a dependency of rspec-rails, so
unnecessary)
* Changed what is now line 44 to what gets generated now

Not sure if this will fix anything, but let''s see.

Timo Rößner

2010-Jun-30 16:49 UTC

head link

[rspec-users] rspec 2 not cleaning up after examples run?

On Jun 29, 12:14?pm, David Chelimsky <dchelim... at gmail.com>
wrote:> On Jun 29, 2010, at 2:50 AM, Timo R??ner wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jun 28, 5:35 pm, David Chelimsky <dchelim... at gmail.com>
wrote:
> >> On Jun 28, 2010, at 10:30 AM, Timo R??ner wrote:
> >>> On Jun 28, 5:03 pm, David Chelimsky <dchelim... at
gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> On Jun 28, 2010, at 10:00 AM, Timo R??ner wrote:
>
> >>>>> Hey guys,
>
> >>>>> I let the code speak for itself:
>
> >>>>> Below are my currently failing specs, please
don''t pay too much
> >>>>> attention to the specs themselves, I just want to give
you a "real
> >>>>> life example" of what''s happening - the
only interesting thing about
> >>>>> the specs is that there is a call to
Factory(:challenge) in each of
> >>>>> them and a before-each-call putting out
what''s currently in the
> >>>>> database:
>
> >>>>> ?describe ''featuring'' do
>
> >>>>> ? ?before(:each) do
> >>>>> ? ? ?puts "Before Each:"
> >>>>> ? ? ?puts "Featured Challenges size:
#{Challenge.featured.size}"
> >>>>> ? ? ?puts "Challenges count:
#{Challenge.count}"
> >>>>> ? ?end
>
> >>>>> ? ?it ''should tell if a challenge is
featured'' do
> >>>>> ? ? ?challenge = Factory(:challenge, :feature_position
=> 1)
> >>>>> ? ? ?challenge.should be_featured
> >>>>> ? ?end
>
> >>>>> ? ?it ''should tell if a challenge is not
featured'' do
> >>>>> ? ? ?challenge = Factory(:challenge, :feature_position
=> 0)
> >>>>> ? ? ?challenge.should_not be_featured
> >>>>> ? ?end
>
> >>>>> ? ?it ''should feature a challenge''
do
> >>>>> ? ? ?challenge = Factory(:challenge)
> >>>>> ? ? ?challenge.feature!
> >>>>> ? ? ?Challenge.featured.should == [challenge]
> >>>>> ? ?end
>
> >>>>> ? ?it ''should unfeature a challenge''
do
> >>>>> ? ? ?challenge = Factory(:challenge, :feature_position
=> 1)
> >>>>> ? ? ?challenge.unfeature!
> >>>>> ? ? ?Challenge.featured.should be_empty
> >>>>> ? ?end
> >>>>> ?end
>
> >>>>> Now to the interesting part:
>
> >>>>> A spec run using rails 2.3.5 and rspec 1:
>
> >>>>> bundle exec spec spec/models/challenge_spec.rb
> >>>>> Before Each:
> >>>>> Featured Challenges size: 0
> >>>>> Challenges count: 0
> >>>>> .Before Each:
> >>>>> Featured Challenges size: 0
> >>>>> Challenges count: 0
> >>>>> .Before Each:
> >>>>> Featured Challenges size: 0
> >>>>> Challenges count: 0
> >>>>> .Before Each:
> >>>>> Featured Challenges size: 0
> >>>>> Challenges count: 0
> >>>>> ..............................
>
> >>>>> -> Looks good.
>
> >>>>> Here''s the exact same spec run with
rspec-2.0.0.beta.13 and
> >>>>> rails-3.0.0.beta4:
>
> >>>>> Before Each:
> >>>>> Featured Challenges size: 0
> >>>>> Challenges count: 0
> >>>>> Before Each:
> >>>>> Featured Challenges size: 1
> >>>>> Challenges count: 1
> >>>>> .Before Each:
> >>>>> Featured Challenges size: 1
> >>>>> Challenges count: 2
> >>>>> Before Each:
> >>>>> Featured Challenges size: 2
> >>>>> Challenges count: 3
>
> >>>>> So apparently the latest rspec doesn''t clean
up after examples at all?
>
> >>>>> Is this a bug or a feature?
>
> >>>> Bug, but please check if it''s still true of
beta.14.1.
>
> >>> Hey David,
>
> >>> I just tried it out using the latest rspec and rspec-rails:
>
> >>> Gemfile:
>
> >>> ?gem ''rspec'',
''2.0.0.beta.14''
> >>> ?gem ''rspec-rails'',
''2.0.0.beta.14.1
>
> >>> $ bundle show rspec
> >>> ~/.bundle/ruby/1.8/gems/rspec-2.0.0.beta.14
>
> >>> $bundle show rspec-rails
> >>> ~/.bundle/ruby/1.8/gems/rspec-rails-2.0.0.beta.14.1
>
> >>> Unfortunately, the bug still exists when using this
configuration:
>
> >>> Before Each:
> >>> Featured Challenges size: 0
> >>> Challenges count: 0
> >>> .Before Each:
> >>> Featured Challenges size: 1
> >>> Challenges count: 1
> >>> .Before Each:
> >>> Featured Challenges size: 1
> >>> Challenges count: 2
> >>> FBefore Each:
> >>> Featured Challenges size: 2
> >>> Challenges count: 3
>
> >> What''s in your Gemfile and spec/spec_helper.rb?
>
> >> ps - please post in-line or at the bottom so we can follow the
thread.
> > Hi David,
>
> > ->http://gist.github.com/456941
>
> I forked and made a couple of changes:http://gist.github.com/457034
>
> * Added :development to the group declaration on line 31
> * Changed rspec-rails to beta.14.2
> * Removed the rspec declaration (it''s a dependency of rspec-rails,
so unnecessary)
> * Changed what is now line 44 to what gets generated now
>
> Not sure if this will fix anything, but let''s see.
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-us... at
rubyforge.orghttp://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
Hey,

@Wincent alright, thanks.

@David

I changed my Gemfile and my spec_helper as you suggested (right now
they are exactly the same as in your gist) and ran "bundle install".

Unfortunately this setup seems to cause another problem:

( $ )  bundle exec spec spec/models/challenge_spec.rb
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/bundler-0.9.26/lib/bundler/
shared_helpers.rb:153:in `bin_path'': can''t find executable
spec
(Gem::Exception)
from ~/.bundle/ruby/1.8/bin/spec:19

( $ )  bundle show rspec
~.bundle/ruby/1.8/gems/rspec-2.0.0.beta.15

Timo Rößner

2010-Jun-30 16:55 UTC

head link

[rspec-users] rspec 2 not cleaning up after examples run?

On Jun 29, 12:14?pm, David Chelimsky <dchelim... at gmail.com>
wrote:> On Jun 29, 2010, at 2:50 AM, Timo R??ner wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jun 28, 5:35 pm, David Chelimsky <dchelim... at gmail.com>
wrote:
> >> On Jun 28, 2010, at 10:30 AM, Timo R??ner wrote:
> >>> On Jun 28, 5:03 pm, David Chelimsky <dchelim... at
gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> On Jun 28, 2010, at 10:00 AM, Timo R??ner wrote:
>
> >>>>> Hey guys,
>
> >>>>> I let the code speak for itself:
>
> >>>>> Below are my currently failing specs, please
don''t pay too much
> >>>>> attention to the specs themselves, I just want to give
you a "real
> >>>>> life example" of what''s happening - the
only interesting thing about
> >>>>> the specs is that there is a call to
Factory(:challenge) in each of
> >>>>> them and a before-each-call putting out
what''s currently in the
> >>>>> database:
>
> >>>>> ?describe ''featuring'' do
>
> >>>>> ? ?before(:each) do
> >>>>> ? ? ?puts "Before Each:"
> >>>>> ? ? ?puts "Featured Challenges size:
#{Challenge.featured.size}"
> >>>>> ? ? ?puts "Challenges count:
#{Challenge.count}"
> >>>>> ? ?end
>
> >>>>> ? ?it ''should tell if a challenge is
featured'' do
> >>>>> ? ? ?challenge = Factory(:challenge, :feature_position
=> 1)
> >>>>> ? ? ?challenge.should be_featured
> >>>>> ? ?end
>
> >>>>> ? ?it ''should tell if a challenge is not
featured'' do
> >>>>> ? ? ?challenge = Factory(:challenge, :feature_position
=> 0)
> >>>>> ? ? ?challenge.should_not be_featured
> >>>>> ? ?end
>
> >>>>> ? ?it ''should feature a challenge''
do
> >>>>> ? ? ?challenge = Factory(:challenge)
> >>>>> ? ? ?challenge.feature!
> >>>>> ? ? ?Challenge.featured.should == [challenge]
> >>>>> ? ?end
>
> >>>>> ? ?it ''should unfeature a challenge''
do
> >>>>> ? ? ?challenge = Factory(:challenge, :feature_position
=> 1)
> >>>>> ? ? ?challenge.unfeature!
> >>>>> ? ? ?Challenge.featured.should be_empty
> >>>>> ? ?end
> >>>>> ?end
>
> >>>>> Now to the interesting part:
>
> >>>>> A spec run using rails 2.3.5 and rspec 1:
>
> >>>>> bundle exec spec spec/models/challenge_spec.rb
> >>>>> Before Each:
> >>>>> Featured Challenges size: 0
> >>>>> Challenges count: 0
> >>>>> .Before Each:
> >>>>> Featured Challenges size: 0
> >>>>> Challenges count: 0
> >>>>> .Before Each:
> >>>>> Featured Challenges size: 0
> >>>>> Challenges count: 0
> >>>>> .Before Each:
> >>>>> Featured Challenges size: 0
> >>>>> Challenges count: 0
> >>>>> ..............................
>
> >>>>> -> Looks good.
>
> >>>>> Here''s the exact same spec run with
rspec-2.0.0.beta.13 and
> >>>>> rails-3.0.0.beta4:
>
> >>>>> Before Each:
> >>>>> Featured Challenges size: 0
> >>>>> Challenges count: 0
> >>>>> Before Each:
> >>>>> Featured Challenges size: 1
> >>>>> Challenges count: 1
> >>>>> .Before Each:
> >>>>> Featured Challenges size: 1
> >>>>> Challenges count: 2
> >>>>> Before Each:
> >>>>> Featured Challenges size: 2
> >>>>> Challenges count: 3
>
> >>>>> So apparently the latest rspec doesn''t clean
up after examples at all?
>
> >>>>> Is this a bug or a feature?
>
> >>>> Bug, but please check if it''s still true of
beta.14.1.
>
> >>> Hey David,
>
> >>> I just tried it out using the latest rspec and rspec-rails:
>
> >>> Gemfile:
>
> >>> ?gem ''rspec'',
''2.0.0.beta.14''
> >>> ?gem ''rspec-rails'',
''2.0.0.beta.14.1
>
> >>> $ bundle show rspec
> >>> ~/.bundle/ruby/1.8/gems/rspec-2.0.0.beta.14
>
> >>> $bundle show rspec-rails
> >>> ~/.bundle/ruby/1.8/gems/rspec-rails-2.0.0.beta.14.1
>
> >>> Unfortunately, the bug still exists when using this
configuration:
>
> >>> Before Each:
> >>> Featured Challenges size: 0
> >>> Challenges count: 0
> >>> .Before Each:
> >>> Featured Challenges size: 1
> >>> Challenges count: 1
> >>> .Before Each:
> >>> Featured Challenges size: 1
> >>> Challenges count: 2
> >>> FBefore Each:
> >>> Featured Challenges size: 2
> >>> Challenges count: 3
>
> >> What''s in your Gemfile and spec/spec_helper.rb?
>
> >> ps - please post in-line or at the bottom so we can follow the
thread.
> > Hi David,
>
> > ->http://gist.github.com/456941
>
> I forked and made a couple of changes:http://gist.github.com/457034
>
> * Added :development to the group declaration on line 31
> * Changed rspec-rails to beta.14.2
> * Removed the rspec declaration (it''s a dependency of rspec-rails,
so unnecessary)
> * Changed what is now line 44 to what gets generated now
>
> Not sure if this will fix anything, but let''s see.
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-us... at
rubyforge.orghttp://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
Hey,

@Wincent alright, thanks.

@David

I changed my Gemfile and my spec_helper as you suggested (right now
they are exactly the same as in your gist) and ran "bundle install".

Unfortunately this setup seems to cause another problem:

( $ )  bundle exec spec spec/models/challenge_spec.rb
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/bundler-0.9.26/lib/bundler/
shared_helpers.rb:153:in `bin_path'': can''t find executable
spec
(Gem::Exception)
from ~/.bundle/ruby/1.8/bin/spec:19

( $ )  bundle show rspec
~.bundle/ruby/1.8/gems/rspec-2.0.0.beta.15

David Chelimsky

2010-Jun-30 17:26 UTC

head link

[rspec-users] rspec 2 not cleaning up after examples run?

On Jun 30, 2010, at 11:55 AM, Timo R??ner wrote:
> On Jun 29, 12:14 pm, David Chelimsky <dchelim... at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Jun 29, 2010, at 2:50 AM, Timo R??ner wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Jun 28, 5:35 pm, David Chelimsky <dchelim... at gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>> On Jun 28, 2010, at 10:30 AM, Timo R??ner wrote:
>>>>> On Jun 28, 5:03 pm, David Chelimsky <dchelim... at
gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Jun 28, 2010, at 10:00 AM, Timo R??ner wrote:
>> 
>>>>>>> Hey guys,
>> 
>>>>>>> I let the code speak for itself:
>> 
>>>>>>> Below are my currently failing specs, please
don''t pay too much
>>>>>>> attention to the specs themselves, I just want to
give you a "real
>>>>>>> life example" of what''s happening -
the only interesting thing about
>>>>>>> the specs is that there is a call to
Factory(:challenge) in each of
>>>>>>> them and a before-each-call putting out
what''s currently in the
>>>>>>> database:
>> 
>>>>>>>  describe ''featuring'' do
>> 
>>>>>>>    before(:each) do
>>>>>>>      puts "Before Each:"
>>>>>>>      puts "Featured Challenges size:
#{Challenge.featured.size}"
>>>>>>>      puts "Challenges count:
#{Challenge.count}"
>>>>>>>    end
>> 
>>>>>>>    it ''should tell if a challenge is
featured'' do
>>>>>>>      challenge = Factory(:challenge,
:feature_position => 1)
>>>>>>>      challenge.should be_featured
>>>>>>>    end
>> 
>>>>>>>    it ''should tell if a challenge is not
featured'' do
>>>>>>>      challenge = Factory(:challenge,
:feature_position => 0)
>>>>>>>      challenge.should_not be_featured
>>>>>>>    end
>> 
>>>>>>>    it ''should feature a
challenge'' do
>>>>>>>      challenge = Factory(:challenge)
>>>>>>>      challenge.feature!
>>>>>>>      Challenge.featured.should == [challenge]
>>>>>>>    end
>> 
>>>>>>>    it ''should unfeature a
challenge'' do
>>>>>>>      challenge = Factory(:challenge,
:feature_position => 1)
>>>>>>>      challenge.unfeature!
>>>>>>>      Challenge.featured.should be_empty
>>>>>>>    end
>>>>>>>  end
>> 
>>>>>>> Now to the interesting part:
>> 
>>>>>>> A spec run using rails 2.3.5 and rspec 1:
>> 
>>>>>>> bundle exec spec spec/models/challenge_spec.rb
>>>>>>> Before Each:
>>>>>>> Featured Challenges size: 0
>>>>>>> Challenges count: 0
>>>>>>> .Before Each:
>>>>>>> Featured Challenges size: 0
>>>>>>> Challenges count: 0
>>>>>>> .Before Each:
>>>>>>> Featured Challenges size: 0
>>>>>>> Challenges count: 0
>>>>>>> .Before Each:
>>>>>>> Featured Challenges size: 0
>>>>>>> Challenges count: 0
>>>>>>> ..............................
>> 
>>>>>>> -> Looks good.
>> 
>>>>>>> Here''s the exact same spec run with
rspec-2.0.0.beta.13 and
>>>>>>> rails-3.0.0.beta4:
>> 
>>>>>>> Before Each:
>>>>>>> Featured Challenges size: 0
>>>>>>> Challenges count: 0
>>>>>>> Before Each:
>>>>>>> Featured Challenges size: 1
>>>>>>> Challenges count: 1
>>>>>>> .Before Each:
>>>>>>> Featured Challenges size: 1
>>>>>>> Challenges count: 2
>>>>>>> Before Each:
>>>>>>> Featured Challenges size: 2
>>>>>>> Challenges count: 3
>> 
>>>>>>> So apparently the latest rspec doesn''t
clean up after examples at all?
>> 
>>>>>>> Is this a bug or a feature?
>> 
>>>>>> Bug, but please check if it''s still true of
beta.14.1.
>> 
>>>>> Hey David,
>> 
>>>>> I just tried it out using the latest rspec and rspec-rails:
>> 
>>>>> Gemfile:
>> 
>>>>>  gem ''rspec'',
''2.0.0.beta.14''
>>>>>  gem ''rspec-rails'',
''2.0.0.beta.14.1
>> 
>>>>> $ bundle show rspec
>>>>> ~/.bundle/ruby/1.8/gems/rspec-2.0.0.beta.14
>> 
>>>>> $bundle show rspec-rails
>>>>> ~/.bundle/ruby/1.8/gems/rspec-rails-2.0.0.beta.14.1
>> 
>>>>> Unfortunately, the bug still exists when using this
configuration:
>> 
>>>>> Before Each:
>>>>> Featured Challenges size: 0
>>>>> Challenges count: 0
>>>>> .Before Each:
>>>>> Featured Challenges size: 1
>>>>> Challenges count: 1
>>>>> .Before Each:
>>>>> Featured Challenges size: 1
>>>>> Challenges count: 2
>>>>> FBefore Each:
>>>>> Featured Challenges size: 2
>>>>> Challenges count: 3
>> 
>>>> What''s in your Gemfile and spec/spec_helper.rb?
>> 
>>>> ps - please post in-line or at the bottom so we can follow the
thread.
>>> Hi David,
>> 
>>> ->http://gist.github.com/456941
>> 
>> I forked and made a couple of changes:http://gist.github.com/457034
>> 
>> * Added :development to the group declaration on line 31
>> * Changed rspec-rails to beta.14.2
>> * Removed the rspec declaration (it''s a dependency of
rspec-rails, so unnecessary)
>> * Changed what is now line 44 to what gets generated now
>> 
>> Not sure if this will fix anything, but let''s see.
>> _______________________________________________
>> rspec-users mailing list
>> rspec-us... at
rubyforge.orghttp://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
> 
> Hey,
> 
> @Wincent alright, thanks.
> 
> @David
> 
> I changed my Gemfile and my spec_helper as you suggested (right now
> they are exactly the same as in your gist) and ran "bundle
install".
> 
> Unfortunately this setup seems to cause another problem:
> 
> ( $ )  bundle exec spec spec/models/challenge_spec.rb
> /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/bundler-0.9.26/lib/bundler/
> shared_helpers.rb:153:in `bin_path'': can''t find
executable spec
> (Gem::Exception)
> from ~/.bundle/ruby/1.8/bin/spec:19
> 
> ( $ )  bundle show rspec
> ~.bundle/ruby/1.8/gems/rspec-2.0.0.beta.15
The command is rspec in rspec 2. Try:

bundle exec rspec spec/models/challenge_spec.rb

Cheers,
David

Amiruddin Nagri

2010-Jun-30 17:44 UTC

head link

[rspec-users] rspec 2 not cleaning up after examples run?

I am not sure if this will help or not but I was also getting data not
cleared properly when run specs through rake but when ran using script/spec
it was cleaning up the data

Amir

On Jun 30, 2010 10:56 PM, "David Chelimsky" <dchelimsky at
gmail.com> wrote:


On Jun 30, 2010, at 11:55 AM, Timo R??ner wrote:
> On Jun 29, 12:14 pm, David Chelimsky <dchelim.....The command is rspec in rspec 2. Try:

bundle exec rspec spec/models/challenge_spec.rb

Cheers,
David

_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users at rubyforge.org
h...
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rspec-users/attachments/20100630/7f139cf2/attachment.html>

Timo Rößner

2010-Jul-01 08:22 UTC

head link

[rspec-users] rspec 2 not cleaning up after examples run?

@David,

alright, I tried:

  bundle exec rspec spec/models/challenge_spec.rb

-> Same results, same log output as above.

@Amiruddin

script/spec would be rails 2 / rspec 1 - my problem occurs with rails
3 / rspec 2 (and script/spec doesn''t exist because of that).

On Jun 30, 7:44?pm, Amiruddin Nagri <amir.na... at gmail.com>
wrote:> I am not sure if this will help or not but I was also getting data not
> cleared properly when run specs through rake but when ran using script/spec
> it was cleaning up the data
>
> Amir
>
> On Jun 30, 2010 10:56 PM, "David Chelimsky" <dchelim... at
gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Jun 30, 2010, at 11:55 AM, Timo R??ner wrote:
>
> > On Jun 29, 12:14 pm, David Chelimsky <dchelim.....
>
> The command is rspec in rspec 2. Try:
>
> bundle exec rspec spec/models/challenge_spec.rb
>
> Cheers,
> David
>
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-us... at rubyforge.org
> h...
>
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-us... at
rubyforge.orghttp://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users

David Chelimsky

2010-Jul-01 12:15 UTC

head link

[rspec-users] rspec 2 not cleaning up after examples run?

On Jul 1, 2010, at 3:22 AM, Timo R??ner wrote:
> On Jun 30, 7:44 pm, Amiruddin Nagri <amir.na... at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I am not sure if this will help or not but I was also getting data not
>> cleared properly when run specs through rake but when ran using
script/spec
>> it was cleaning up the data
>> 
>> Amir
>> 
>> On Jun 30, 2010 10:56 PM, "David Chelimsky" <dchelim... at
gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> On Jun 30, 2010, at 11:55 AM, Timo R??ner wrote:
>> 
>>> On Jun 29, 12:14 pm, David Chelimsky <dchelim.....
>> 
>> The command is rspec in rspec 2. Try:
>> 
>> bundle exec rspec spec/models/challenge_spec.rb
> @David,
> 
> alright, I tried:
> 
>  bundle exec rspec spec/models/challenge_spec.rb
> 
> -> Same results, same log output as above.
> 
> @Amiruddin
> 
> script/spec would be rails 2 / rspec 1 - my problem occurs with rails
> 3 / rspec 2 (and script/spec doesn''t exist because of that).
Hard to break the top posting habit :) I moved your comments to the bottom.

@Timo - I''m sorry I missed this the first time through, but
it''s because the spec_helper config is missing this line:

  config.use_transactional_fixtures = true

The post-install hook when you install rspec-rails instructs you to re-run
''script/rails generate rspec:install'', and if you do so
you''ll see this line in the generated spec_helper.

Let me know if that solves it. I''m pretty sure it will.

Cheers,
David

Timo Rößner

2010-Jul-05 22:16 UTC

head link

[rspec-users] rspec 2 not cleaning up after examples run?

Hey David,

sorry for the late reply, you nailed it, that was the problem
indeed..:-)

Thanks a lot for the assist.

Cheers

On Jul 1, 2:15?pm, David Chelimsky <dchelim... at gmail.com>
wrote:> On Jul 1, 2010, at 3:22 AM, Timo R??ner wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jun 30, 7:44 pm, Amiruddin Nagri <amir.na... at gmail.com>
wrote:
> >> I am not sure if this will help or not but I was also getting data
not
> >> cleared properly when run specs through rake but when ran using
script/spec
> >> it was cleaning up the data
>
> >> Amir
>
> >> On Jun 30, 2010 10:56 PM, "David Chelimsky"
<dchelim... at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> On Jun 30, 2010, at 11:55 AM, Timo R??ner wrote:
>
> >>> On Jun 29, 12:14 pm, David Chelimsky <dchelim.....
>
> >> The command is rspec in rspec 2. Try:
>
> >> bundle exec rspec spec/models/challenge_spec.rb
> > @David,
>
> > alright, I tried:
>
> > ?bundle exec rspec spec/models/challenge_spec.rb
>
> > -> Same results, same log output as above.
>
> > @Amiruddin
>
> > script/spec would be rails 2 / rspec 1 - my problem occurs with rails
> > 3 / rspec 2 (and script/spec doesn''t exist because of that).
>
> Hard to break the top posting habit :) I moved your comments to the bottom.
>
> @Timo - I''m sorry I missed this the first time through, but
it''s because the spec_helper config is missing this line:
>
> ? config.use_transactional_fixtures = true
>
> The post-install hook when you install rspec-rails instructs you to re-run
''script/rails generate rspec:install'', and if you do so
you''ll see this line in the generated spec_helper.
>
> Let me know if that solves it. I''m pretty sure it will.
>
> Cheers,
> David
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-us... at
rubyforge.orghttp://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users

rspec users - Jun 2010 - rspec 2 not cleaning up after examples run?

[rspec-users] rspec 2 not cleaning up after examples run?

[rspec-users] rspec 2 not cleaning up after examples run?

[rspec-users] rspec 2 not cleaning up after examples run?

[rspec-users] rspec 2 not cleaning up after examples run?

[rspec-users] rspec 2 not cleaning up after examples run?

[rspec-users] rspec 2 not cleaning up after examples run?

[rspec-users] rspec 2 not cleaning up after examples run?

[rspec-users] rspec 2 not cleaning up after examples run?

[rspec-users] rspec 2 not cleaning up after examples run?

[rspec-users] rspec 2 not cleaning up after examples run?

[rspec-users] rspec 2 not cleaning up after examples run?

[rspec-users] rspec 2 not cleaning up after examples run?

[rspec-users] rspec 2 not cleaning up after examples run?

[rspec-users] rspec 2 not cleaning up after examples run?