Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches for "llvm29".
Did you mean:
llvm2.9
2011 May 23
2
[LLVMdev] Debug llc crash using bugpoint
Hi,
What is the best way to debug an llc crash using bugpoint?
I am getting the following crash that I would like to reduce
llc: /home/vadve/aggarwa4/llvm29/llvm-2.9/lib/MC/MCAsmStreamer.cpp:273:
virtual void<unnamed>::MCAsmStreamer::EmitLabel(llvm::MCSymbol*): Assertion
`Symbol->isUndefined() && "Cannot define a symbol twice!"' failed.
0 llc 0x00000000013ae046
1 llc 0x00000000013ae5d4
2 libpthr...
2011 Dec 16
3
[LLVMdev] llvm/clang test failures on powerpc-darwin8
...le build/test log for the gcc46 bootstrap.)
>> This consistency between different bootstraps of the release gives me
>> some hope that g++-4.0.1 is yet usable.
>
> David,
> Another alternative for darwin8 would be to bootstrap llvm/clang 3.0 using
> the clang from the fink llvm29 package (since clang 2.9 should build fine against
> gcc-4.0.1).
> Jack
Hi Jack,
I never managed to successfully build llvm29 on powerpc-darwin8,
after running into some build issues, and having filed bug 9958, I got the
impression of ppc-darwin being "not supported"...
2011 May 23
0
[LLVMdev] Debug llc crash using bugpoint
...e file> --tool-args -- <llc arguments>
Cameron
On May 23, 2011, at 1:33 PM, Arushi Aggarwal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What is the best way to debug an llc crash using bugpoint?
>
> I am getting the following crash that I would like to reduce
>
> llc: /home/vadve/aggarwa4/llvm29/llvm-2.9/lib/MC/MCAsmStreamer.cpp:273: virtual void<unnamed>::MCAsmStreamer::EmitLabel(llvm::MCSymbol*): Assertion `Symbol->isUndefined() && "Cannot define a symbol twice!"' failed.
> 0 llc 0x00000000013ae046
> 1 llc 0x00000000013ae5d4...
2011 Dec 16
0
[LLVMdev] llvm/clang test failures on powerpc-darwin8
...e gcc46 bootstrap.)
>>> This consistency between different bootstraps of the release gives me
>>> some hope that g++-4.0.1 is yet usable.
>>
>> David,
>> Another alternative for darwin8 would be to bootstrap llvm/clang 3.0 using
>> the clang from the fink llvm29 package (since clang 2.9 should build fine against
>> gcc-4.0.1).
>> Jack
>
> Hi Jack,
> I never managed to successfully build llvm29 on powerpc-darwin8, after
> running into some build issues, and having filed bug 9958, I got the
> impression of ppc-darwin...
2011 Dec 16
0
[LLVMdev] llvm/clang test failures on powerpc-darwin8
...I no longer have the whole build/test log for the gcc46 bootstrap.)
> This consistency between different bootstraps of the release gives me
> some hope that g++-4.0.1 is yet usable.
David,
Another alternative for darwin8 would be to bootstrap llvm/clang 3.0 using
the clang from the fink llvm29 package (since clang 2.9 should build fine against
gcc-4.0.1).
Jack
>
> I don't know how far diverged trunk is from the 3.0-branch, but there are
> far fewer CodeGen test failures than with svn-trunk. Both trunk and
> branch exhibit numerous PCH failures. Does this...
2011 Sep 09
0
[LLVMdev] SAFECode and CMake?
On 9/9/11 1:08 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> Are there any plans to add CMake support to the build of
> SAFECode?
No, there are no current plans to do so. Is not having CMake support a
show-stopper for you? I imagine adding support for it would be
straightforward.
> Also are there any current instructions for building
> llvm/clang with SAFECode support from current svn?
Yes.
2011 Sep 09
2
[LLVMdev] SAFECode and CMake?
Are there any plans to add CMake support to the build of
SAFECode? Also are there any current instructions for building
llvm/clang with SAFECode support from current svn?
Jack
2011 Dec 16
3
[LLVMdev] llvm/clang test failures on powerpc-darwin8
Hi,
Thanks for the quick reply again.
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 1:17 PM, David Fang <fang at csl.cornell.edu> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've bootstrapped llvm/clang from svn-trunk on powerpc-darwin8 (g++-4.0.1), and
>> have the following test results to share.
>> Summary below, full log at:
>>
2011 May 18
0
[LLVMdev] 2.9 pass manager asserts "Unable to handle Pass that requires lower level Analysis pass"
...0;
bool Pass1::runOnModule(Module &M) {
M.dump();
return false;
}
static RegisterPass<Pass2>
Y("pass2", "Phase 2");
char Pass2::ID = 0;
bool Pass2::runOnModule (Module &M) {
M.dump();
return false;
}
I hit the following assert
opt: /home/vadve/aggarwa4/llvm29/llvm-2.9/lib/VMCore/PassManager.cpp:1613:
virtual void llvm::MPPassManager::addLowerLevelRequiredPass(llvm::Pass*,
llvm::Pass*): Assertion `(P->getPotentialPassManagerType() <
RequiredPass->getPotentialPassManagerType()) && "Unable to handle Pass that
requires lower level Anal...
2011 May 17
2
[LLVMdev] x86 cross compiler for ppc fails to build
...: ---
/llvm-gcc-4.2-2.9.source/gcc/../include
-I/local/maartenf/opt/src/all_llvm_2_9/buildroot_ppc/src/llvm-gcc-4.2-2.9.source/gcc/../libcpp/include
-I/local/maartenf/opt/src/all_llvm_2_9/buildroot_ppc/src/llvm-gcc-4.2-2.9.source/gcc/../libdecnumber
-I../libdecnumber
-I/local/maartenf/opt/bin/llvm29/powerpc-linux/llvm/include -g0
-finhibit-size-directive -fno-inline-functions -fno-exceptions
-fno-zero-initialized-in-bss -fno-toplevel-reorder -Dinhibit_libc
-msdata=none \
-c
/local/maartenf/opt/src/all_llvm_2_9/buildroot_ppc/src/llvm-gcc-4.2-2.9.source/gcc/crtstuff.c
-DCRT_BEGIN...