Tom Rix
2022-Apr-18 15:28 UTC
[Nouveau] [PATCH] drm/nouveau/gr/gf100-: change gf108_gr_fwif from global to static
Smatch reports this issue gf108.c:147:1: warning: symbol 'gf108_gr_fwif' was not declared. Should it be static? gf108_gr_fwif is only used in gf108.c. Single file variables should not be global so change gf108_gr_fwif's storage-class specifier to static. Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix at redhat.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/gf108.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/gf108.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/gf108.c index 030640bb3dca..ab3760e804b8 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/gf108.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/gf108.c @@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ gf108_gr = { } }; -const struct gf100_gr_fwif +static const struct gf100_gr_fwif gf108_gr_fwif[] = { { -1, gf100_gr_load, &gf108_gr }, { -1, gf100_gr_nofw, &gf108_gr }, -- 2.27.0
Lyude Paul
2022-Apr-18 18:53 UTC
[Nouveau] [PATCH] drm/nouveau/gr/gf100-: change gf108_gr_fwif from global to static
Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com> Will push to the appropriate branch in a moment On Mon, 2022-04-18 at 11:28 -0400, Tom Rix wrote:> Smatch reports this issue > gf108.c:147:1: warning: symbol 'gf108_gr_fwif' > ? was not declared. Should it be static? > > gf108_gr_fwif is only used in gf108.c.? Single > file variables should not be global so change > gf108_gr_fwif's storage-class specifier to static. > > Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix at redhat.com> > --- > ?drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/gf108.c | 2 +- > ?1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/gf108.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/gf108.c > index 030640bb3dca..ab3760e804b8 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/gf108.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/gf108.c > @@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ gf108_gr = { > ????????} > ?}; > ? > -const struct gf100_gr_fwif > +static const struct gf100_gr_fwif > ?gf108_gr_fwif[] = { > ????????{ -1, gf100_gr_load, &gf108_gr }, > ????????{ -1, gf100_gr_nofw, &gf108_gr },-- Cheers, Lyude Paul (she/her) Software Engineer at Red Hat