Carter Cheng
2011-Nov-01 08:03 UTC
[LLVMdev] itineraries for x86 and optimization in the target
Hello, Is there code in place for lowering the bitcode SSA into an optimized sequence for the itineraries? I have been curious whether or not such descriptions exist for the x86 family or whether there are techniques to make a clear determination of this information. Regards, Carter. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20111101/71f4099c/attachment.html>
Andrew Trick
2011-Nov-04 02:19 UTC
[LLVMdev] itineraries for x86 and optimization in the target
On Nov 1, 2011, at 1:03 AM, Carter Cheng wrote:> Is there code in place for lowering the bitcode SSA into an optimized sequence for the itineraries? I have been curious whether or not such descriptions exist for the x86 family or whether there are techniques to make a clear determination of this information.This thread might partially answer your question: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.compilers.llvm.devel/43347 -Andy
Carter Cheng
2011-Nov-05 06:54 UTC
[LLVMdev] itineraries for x86 and optimization in the target
Thanks Andy. On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 7:19 PM, Andrew Trick <atrick at apple.com> wrote:> On Nov 1, 2011, at 1:03 AM, Carter Cheng wrote: > > Is there code in place for lowering the bitcode SSA into an optimized > sequence for the itineraries? I have been curious whether or not such > descriptions exist for the x86 family or whether there are techniques to > make a clear determination of this information. > > This thread might partially answer your question: > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.compilers.llvm.devel/43347 > > -Andy >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20111104/97974183/attachment.html>