on 05/03/2010 11:13 AM Dale Johannesen said the following:> On May 3, 2010, at 10:43 AMPDT, Vladimir G. Ivanovic wrote: > > >> I successfully built LLVM (r102824) with >> >> ./configure --enable-optimized --enable-targets=host --with-built-clang >> >> on Fedora 12 on an Athlon64 processor. (The clang is the 2.7 pre-built >> version.) > > and the llvm-gcc appears to be also?Correct. Both are in my PATH.>> However, running `make check' produced 6 unexpected failures >> (see below). If there's something you'd like me to do, just holler. > > In general, tests added after a branch forked won't pass on that branch. That accounts for these at least:I don't understand. These are tests in the LLVM testsuite, not llvm-gcc tests. I have a consistent copy of LLVM and I don't know of any dependencies between post-2.7 LLVM and llvm-gcc-2.7. So they should pass, no? Or are you saying that there are such (heretofore) unmentioned dependencies that require a post-2.7 version of llvm-gcc to pass? --- Vladimir Vladimir G. Ivanovic http://www.leonora.org +1 650 450 4101 vladimir at acm.org>> FAIL: /usr/local/src/llvm/test/FrontendC/inline-asm-function.c >> Failed with exit(1) at line 1 >> while running: /usr/local/llvm-gcc4.2-2.7-x86_64-linux/bin/llvm-gcc >> -emit-llvm -w -S >> /usr/local/src/llvm/test/FrontendC/inline-asm-function.c -fasm-blocks -o >> - -O | /bin/grep naked >> child process exited abnormally >> Running /usr/local/src/llvm/test/FrontendC++/dg.exp ... >> >> FAIL: >> /usr/local/src/llvm/test/FrontendC++/2010-04-30-OptimizedMethod-Dbg.cpp >> Failed with exit(1) at line 2 >> while running: grep "i1 false, i1 true. . . DW_TAG_subprogram" >> 2010-04-30-OptimizedMethod-Dbg.cpp.tmp | count 2 >> Expected 2 lines, got 0. > > and probably others. >-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 261 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100503/e460be38/attachment.sig>
On May 3, 2010, at 12:09 PMPDT, Vladimir G. Ivanovic wrote:> on 05/03/2010 11:13 AM Dale Johannesen said the following: >> On May 3, 2010, at 10:43 AMPDT, Vladimir G. Ivanovic wrote: >> >> >>> I successfully built LLVM (r102824) with >>> >>> ./configure --enable-optimized --enable-targets=host --with-built-clang >>> >>> on Fedora 12 on an Athlon64 processor. (The clang is the 2.7 pre-built >>> version.) >> >> and the llvm-gcc appears to be also? > Correct. Both are in my PATH. >>> However, running `make check' produced 6 unexpected failures >>> (see below). If there's something you'd like me to do, just holler. >> >> In general, tests added after a branch forked won't pass on that branch. That accounts for these at least: > I don't understand. These are tests in the LLVM testsuite, not llvm-gcc > tests.Tests in FrontendC and FrontendC++ are tests of llvm-gcc.> I have a consistent copy of LLVM and I don't know of any > dependencies between post-2.7 LLVM and llvm-gcc-2.7. So they should > pass, no? Or are you saying that there are such (heretofore) unmentioned > dependencies that require a post-2.7 version of llvm-gcc to pass?
on 05/03/2010 12:43 PM Dale Johannesen said the following:> However, running `make check' produced 6 unexpected failures >>>> (see below). If there's something you'd like me to do, just holler. >>> >>> In general, tests added after a branch forked won't pass on that branch. That accounts for these at least: >> I don't understand. These are tests in the LLVM testsuite, not llvm-gcc >> tests. > > Tests in FrontendC and FrontendC++ are tests of llvm-gcc.In general, tests in a particular distribution test that distribution and not some other. -- Vladimir Vladimir G. Ivanovic http://www.leonora.org +1 650 450 4101 vladimir at acm.org> >> I have a consistent copy of LLVM and I don't know of any >> dependencies between post-2.7 LLVM and llvm-gcc-2.7. So they should >> pass, no? Or are you saying that there are such (heretofore) unmentioned >> dependencies that require a post-2.7 version of llvm-gcc to pass? >-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 261 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100503/e81137ad/attachment.sig>