search for: heretofore

...ch. That accounts for these at least: I don't understand. These are tests in the LLVM testsuite, not llvm-gcc tests. I have a consistent copy of LLVM and I don't know of any dependencies between post-2.7 LLVM and llvm-gcc-2.7. So they should pass, no? Or are you saying that there are such (heretofore) unmentioned dependencies that require a post-2.7 version of llvm-gcc to pass? --- Vladimir Vladimir G. Ivanovic http://www.leonora.org +1 650 450 4101 vladimir at acm.org >> FAIL: /usr/local/src/llvm/test/FrontendC/inline-a...

...n the LLVM testsuite, not llvm-gcc > tests. Tests in FrontendC and FrontendC++ are tests of llvm-gcc. > I have a consistent copy of LLVM and I don't know of any > dependencies between post-2.7 LLVM and llvm-gcc-2.7. So they should > pass, no? Or are you saying that there are such (heretofore) unmentioned > dependencies that require a post-2.7 version of llvm-gcc to pass?

It appears I have bigger problems heretofore unknown. I've gone through this several times today since I last wrote, and the phreaknet-run build failed every time, but each time at a different point. The failure manifestation was always the same--during either a compile or link of some module, a different one each time, my entire syst...

I don't use the Anti-Spam plugin; I just fire off a BASH script every four hours with crontab which iterates thru the vmail email accounts and trains Spamassassin 'per-user' accounts. If the script sounds interesting I can post it here. It probably could use a little polish though. Bill On 11/9/2016 6:49 PM, Ben Johnson wrote: > On 11/5/2016 1:22 PM, Larry Rosenman wrote:

....leonora.org +1 650 450 4101 vladimir at acm.org > >> I have a consistent copy of LLVM and I don't know of any >> dependencies between post-2.7 LLVM and llvm-gcc-2.7. So they should >> pass, no? Or are you saying that there are such (heretofore) unmentioned >> dependencies that require a post-2.7 version of llvm-gcc to pass? > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 261 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.llvm....

...ot too much trouble. For my specific use-case, I've been maintaining a "corpus" of known ham/spam messages, and enjoy being able to hand classify/re-classify/ignore if necessary. But I do see the appeal of training with a single script that iterates through each user's mailbox. Heretofore, my thinking has been that combining all "submitted" spam, which is piped into the training mailbox automatically, whenever a user drags from Inbox -> Spam (or vice versa), I have a much broader sample of the the ham and spam out there. And yes, a "shared" corpus among all u...

FYI, By popular demand, we now have an 'ogg-dev' mailing list at xiph.org. This is the new place to discussion generic Ogg format issues and implementations that aren't specific to a single codec, which all our technical lists have been heretofore. For subscription, etc. information please visit http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/ogg-dev Have at! -r

FYI, By popular demand, we now have an 'ogg-dev' mailing list at xiph.org. This is the new place to discussion generic Ogg format issues and implementations that aren't specific to a single codec, which all our technical lists have been heretofore. For subscription, etc. information please visit http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/ogg-dev Have at! -r

On Thursday 06 April 2023 at 18:29:43, Jeff LaCoursiere wrote: > If you just want something easy to use out of the box, install the > FreePBX distro. Given that Steve originally said "I've been using Asterisk, including administering and maintaining it, in some aspect since 2003, but this is the first time I have attempted a from-scratch installation and setup on my own." I

FYI, By popular demand, we now have an 'ogg-dev' mailing list at xiph.org. This is the new place to discussion generic Ogg format issues and implementations that aren't specific to a single codec, which all our technical lists have been heretofore. For subscription, etc. information please visit http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/ogg-dev Have at! -r

> My name is Marcin Manek and I'm the software webmaster here at AG, where > we're dedicated to spreading heretofore unheard music throughout the world > :) Yes, I've used Audiogalaxy for years :-) > My part in our effort is basically providing our users (listeners and > artists) with the means to present their music - I maintain our archive of > encoders, players, rippers, etc. I was naturally...

FYI, By popular demand, we now have an 'ogg-dev' mailing list at xiph.org. This is the new place to discussion generic Ogg format issues and implementations that aren't specific to a single codec, which all our technical lists have been heretofore. For subscription, etc. information please visit http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/ogg-dev Have at! -r

...am using autofs4, not autofs3. That implies a different set of userspace tools as well as an "autofs4" kernel module. Note, though, that the autofs4 module is a standard part of the 2.4.9 kernel. Perhaps the ext3 patches create some sort of conflict with the autofs4 kernel module, heretofore not detected because most folks are still using autofs3? It is also worth mentioning that the oopsen appear when using the ext3-patched kernel even if the no ext3 filesystem is actually being used. If I change /etc/fstab to request ext2 mounting, the oopsen still appear. Even if I use tune2f...

On May 3, 2010, at 10:43 AMPDT, Vladimir G. Ivanovic wrote: > I successfully built LLVM (r102824) with > > ./configure --enable-optimized --enable-targets=host --with-built-clang > > on Fedora 12 on an Athlon64 processor. (The clang is the 2.7 pre-built > version.) and the llvm-gcc appears to be also? > However, running `make check' produced 6 unexpected failures

...ific use-case, I've been maintaining a "corpus" of known > ham/spam messages, and enjoy being able to hand > classify/re-classify/ignore if necessary. > > But I do see the appeal of training with a single script that iterates > through each user's mailbox. > > Heretofore, my thinking has been that combining all "submitted" spam, > which is piped into the training mailbox automatically, whenever a user > drags from Inbox -> Spam (or vice versa), I have a much broader sample > of the the ham and spam out there. > > And yes, a "shared&...

I successfully built LLVM (r102824) with ./configure --enable-optimized --enable-targets=host --with-built-clang on Fedora 12 on an Athlon64 processor. (The clang is the 2.7 pre-built version.) However, running `make check' produced 6 unexpected failures (see below). If there's something you'd like me to do, just holler. --- Vladimir FAIL:

Hi all Very simple question, im sure, but I cant find docs anywhere that tell me how to do this. What I want is for the index page of the server to be generated from rails, is www.wibble.com/ will result in a page that has been processed by rails, has the templates etc. >From what I can see, the index page comes from public/index.html How do I get this to be a rails page? Thanks Jonathan

I am trying to divide the columns of a matrix by the first row in the matrix. I have tried to get this using apply and I seem to be missing a concept regarding the apply w/o calling a function but rather command args %*% / etc. Would using apply be more efficient than this approach? I have observed examples in the archives using this type of approach. Does anybody have a snippet of a call

...course. the thing is, i am certain that i have been clear that the feature that i believe will be "killer" is on-the-fly formatted display. that's my stand. and i'd say my reasoning has been equally clear, namely that this will make markup dirt-simple. the feedback loops were heretofore too indirect, too far removed between writing and rendering. based on the reception "marked" has received, it's plain to see my belief is essentially correct. but "marked" involves a workflow with two apps, so although the feedback is now more _speedy_, it's still more...

Hi, I''ve got a Rails app working that includes two two classes, etc.: Expense & Vendor. I eventually learned that the mental concept I had of their relationship should be express in Rails as: class Expense < ActiveRecord::Base; belongs_to :vendor; end class Vendor < ActiveRecord::Base; has_many :expenses; end