llvm dev - Oct 2007 - [LLVMdev] mailing lists (was RFC: Tail call optimization X86)

On Oct 9, 2007, at 4:29 AM, Arnold Schwaighofer wrote:
> There have been some changes in X86RegisterInfo.cpp that make my last
> patch not merge.
Sorry, I know it's a moving target. :-)
>
> Also there was an error in my code concerning how inreg parameters
> were lowered.
>
> the latest version of the patch does not fail the SPASS llc-beta test
> anymore (darwin-x86).
Very nice.
>
> if/when someone has the time to look at it - i would be happy to mail
> it. i think i should no longer clobber the mailing list with my
> patches :)
Send it my way please.

Thanks,

Evan
>
>
> regards arnold
>
>
> On 7 Oct 2007, at 00:04, Evan Cheng wrote:
>
>> Ok. Like I said, I am not too concerned with one or two llcbeta
>> failures. That's expected.
>>
>> Thx,
>>
>> Evan
>>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev

On Oct 9, 2007, at 4:28 PM, Evan Cheng wrote:
>>
>> if/when someone has the time to look at it - i would be happy to mail
>> it. i think i should no longer clobber the mailing list with my
>> patches :)
Incidentally, if you're worried about spamming llvmdev, feel free to  
use llvm-commits.  People who subscribe there have already signed up  
for a ton of mail :) , so detailed discussion of patches is just fine  
there.  llvmdev is a good place for high level discussions and  
various questions of course, as it is more widely read.

FWIW, there are currently 62 llvm-commits subscribers, 407 llvmdev  
subscribers, and 813 llvm-announce subscribers.

-Chris

> FWIW, there are currently 62 llvm-commits subscribers
plus those that read it via gmane.org, like me :-)