Hi, Have someone there tried the TDM 2400 with 24 FXO? Have had echo problems? or any other problem ? Recommendations? Optional echo cancellation modules are necessary? TIA, Fernando
Hello Fernando, I have checked this card with and without hardware echocan : the hardware echocan module does the job better than the zaptel software can do it. I recommand this module without any doubt. But, the echocan algorithms in zaptel are better and better and the CPUs power grows permanently. It is possible to use this card without hardware echocan, but you will encounter the same results, in this case, as you can obtain with the other TDM Digium's cards : correct for certain situations, not for all extreme cases, depending what listening level your users want, lines specifications and what critical echo threshold they can admit before to not be able to do correctly their job. Near same thing for E1/T1 harware echocan features. Best Regards, Francois BERGERET, France. -----Message d'origine----- De : asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] De la part de Fernando BERRETTA Envoy? : vendredi 17 mars 2006 14:47 ? : Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Objet : [Asterisk-Users] TDM 2400 With 24 FXO Hi, Have someone there tried the TDM 2400 with 24 FXO? Have had echo problems? or any other problem ? Recommendations? Optional echo cancellation modules are necessary? TIA, Fernando _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Dear Francois, Thanks for your advise,, I'll buy the echocan module Best Regards, Fernando -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of f6hqz-m@hamwlan.net Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2006 6:43 PM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: RE : [Asterisk-Users] TDM 2400 With 24 FXO Hello Fernando, I have checked this card with and without hardware echocan : the hardware echocan module does the job better than the zaptel software can do it. I recommand this module without any doubt. But, the echocan algorithms in zaptel are better and better and the CPUs power grows permanently. It is possible to use this card without hardware echocan, but you will encounter the same results, in this case, as you can obtain with the other TDM Digium's cards : correct for certain situations, not for all extreme cases, depending what listening level your users want, lines specifications and what critical echo threshold they can admit before to not be able to do correctly their job. Near same thing for E1/T1 harware echocan features. Best Regards, Francois BERGERET, France. -----Message d'origine----- De : asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] De la part de Fernando BERRETTA Envoy? : vendredi 17 mars 2006 14:47 ? : Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Objet : [Asterisk-Users] TDM 2400 With 24 FXO Hi, Have someone there tried the TDM 2400 with 24 FXO? Have had echo problems? or any other problem ? Recommendations? Optional echo cancellation modules are necessary? TIA, Fernando _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
f6hqz-m@hamwlan.net
2006-Mar-20 23:26 UTC
[Asterisk-Users] RE : RE : [asterisk-dev] iax failure?
Oops ! I have upgraded TRUNK again via SVN and all was seeming to be fine, no more invalid IAX2 frames and able to place and receive calls. I was happy.. But, few calls later (about 5 minutes) : INVAL frames again and no more possibility to place or receive calls, no prompt tone, nothing ! Strange... Best Regards, Francois BERGERET, France.
Administrator TOOTAI
2006-Mar-21 02:26 UTC
[Asterisk-Users] RE : RE : [asterisk-dev] iax failure?
f6hqz-m@hamwlan.net a ?crit :>Oops ! > >I have upgraded TRUNK again via SVN and all was seeming to be fine, no more >invalid IAX2 frames and able to place and receive calls. >I was happy.. > >But, few calls later (about 5 minutes) : INVAL frames again and no more >possibility to place or receive calls, no prompt tone, nothing ! > >Strange... > >Best Regards, >Francois BERGERET, >France. > >Hi Francois, look at this http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=6748 perhaps also your case -- Daniel