Greetings. I applied the Recommended Patch Cluster including 120012-14 to a U3 system today. I upgraded my zpool and it seems like we have some very strange information coming from zpool list and zfs list... [root at sandbox02:/]# zfs list NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT zpool02 8.56G 11.1G 32.6K /zpool02 zpool02/data 5.78G 11.1G 5.78G /mnt/data zpool02/opt 2.73G 11.1G 2.73G /opt zpool02/samba 60.3M 11.1G 60.3M /usr/local/samba [root at sandbox02:/]# zpool list NAME SIZE USED AVAIL CAP HEALTH ALTROOT zpool02 29.9G 12.9G 17.1G 42% ONLINE ->From a U3 system not yet upgraded the commands produce much moreconsistent numbers... [root at sandbox01:/]# zfs list NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT zmirror 1.21G 6.60G 24.5K /zmirror zmirror/opt 1.21G 6.60G 1.21G /opt [root at sandbox01:/]# zpool list NAME SIZE USED AVAIL CAP HEALTH ALTROOT zmirror 7.94G 1.21G 6.73G 15% ONLINE - Is this a bug in U4? Should zfs list show 11.1G available and zpool list show 17.1G available for the same pool?
Solaris wrote:> Greetings. > > I applied the Recommended Patch Cluster including 120012-14 to a U3 > system today. I upgraded my zpool and it seems like we have some very > strange information coming from zpool list and zfs list... > > [root at sandbox02:/]# zfs list > NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT > zpool02 8.56G 11.1G 32.6K /zpool02 > zpool02/data 5.78G 11.1G 5.78G /mnt/data > zpool02/opt 2.73G 11.1G 2.73G /opt > zpool02/samba 60.3M 11.1G 60.3M /usr/local/samba > [root at sandbox02:/]# zpool list > NAME SIZE USED AVAIL CAP HEALTH ALTROOT > zpool02 29.9G 12.9G 17.1G 42% ONLINE -Is this on RAID-Z? If so, you may be seeing 6308817. However, upgrading your bits shouldn''t have changed anything. --matt