Are nested transactions allowed/supported by the DMU? Namely, if I have function Foo and function Bar that both wrap their own operations using a transaction such that Foo and Bar are atomic/transactional, can I have a function FooBar that creates a transaction, invokes Foo, then Bar, and then commits the transaction? Or do I have to rewrite Foo and Bar? (I sense the latter) Thanks in advance. :) -- Regards, Jeremy
No, nested transactions are not allowed. (your sense is correct :-)). -Mark Jeremy Teo wrote:> Are nested transactions allowed/supported by the DMU? > > Namely, if I have function Foo and function Bar that both wrap their > own operations using a transaction such that Foo and Bar are > atomic/transactional, can I have a function FooBar that creates a > transaction, invokes Foo, then Bar, and then commits the transaction? > Or do I have to rewrite Foo and Bar? > > (I sense the latter) > > Thanks in advance. :)