On Mar 7, 2014, at 10:54 AM, Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 07, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>
>> In the context of
http://wiki.xenproject.org/wiki/GSoc_2014#Lazy_restore_using_memory_paging
>> should that be removed then? As the dependency of it would be to first
'un-bitrot' it and that
>> might take more than the original GSoC problem statement describes??
>
> While its a good idea, it can HVM only at this point because PV doesnt
> do paging. So its real work to get this done.
Agreed. And certainly no gimme. But they have a couple months to sink into this.
Thanks
Andres>
> Olaf