Richard Johnson
2013-May-21 09:13 UTC
Re: [alpine-devel] Stable and Secure Distribution Supporting Xen
One more note on my criteria set which led me to Alpine: I need something lightweight. The whole root directory must fit in at most 400-500 MB. On 05/21/2013 10:08 AM, Richard Johnson wrote: I''m choosing between Unix-based operating systems that support Xen. My criteria are the following: - Compatibility: I want to use this OS on a various set of commonly used hardware. I have restricted the CPU instruction set scope to x86_64, but there are a vast range of graphics cards out there. - Stability: The packages and kernel used must be stable versions. Many main distributions such as Debian and RedHat follow his strategy. - Xen Stability: Stable Xen support is necessary - Security With these criteria in mind I have reached to the following distributions: NetBSD, Alpine Linux, FreeBSD, Debian and CentOS. I am currently using Alpine Linux which claims that it is designed with security in mind, however my recent Experience with it showed many bugs. Regards --- Unsubscribe: alpine-devel+unsubscribe@lists.alpinelinux.org Help: alpine-devel+help@lists.alpinelinux.org --- . _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-users
Apparently Analagous Threads
- how to build vTPM with xen 4.3?
- [PATCH 1/2] inspect: recognize the Alpine Linux distribution
- [Bug 1757] New: Alpine 3.19: iptables: Bad rule (does a matching rule exist in that chain?).
- pci-passthrough to a pv domu worked in xen 4.2.2, but not in 4.3.0
- Re: aarch64 vm doesn't boots