I''m not finding much on the ''net; just wondering how good the SMP support in -unstable (or is it in -testing too?) is. I''m picking up a few dual-processor machines, and would love to be able to take advantage of SMP for a few of my guests. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ | nate carlson | natecars@natecarlson.com | http://www.natecarlson.com | | depriving some poor village of its idiot since 1981 | ------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
> I''m not finding much on the ''net; just wondering how good the > SMP support in -unstable (or is it in -testing too?) is. > > I''m picking up a few dual-processor machines, and would love > to be able to take advantage of SMP for a few of my guests.Believed stable, but not optimised. Ian _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, Ian Pratt wrote:> Believed stable, but not optimised.Does not optimised mean that it''ll be slower than running UP, or is there still a performance gain to be had with it? ------------------------------------------------------------------------ | nate carlson | natecars@natecarlson.com | http://www.natecarlson.com | | depriving some poor village of its idiot since 1981 | ------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users