Andrew Cooper
2013-Dec-02 14:38 UTC
[PATCH] xen/x86: Be more power-efficient when waiting forever
The effect is unchanged, but the processor will be spending most of its time in the C1 or C1E power state rather than C0. Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> CC: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org> CC: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com> CC: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com> --- This was discovered while I was playing about in the early_page_fault() handler with the IBM box which was corruption the Xen code section. There is one final for(;;); loop, but is in common code and immediately following a call to panic(), so is actually dead code and will be cleaned up in v2 of my "noreturn" series at the start of 4.5 George: I am requesting that this get a freeze exception, under the qualification of #2 "An awesome release", given no function change threatening --- xen/arch/x86/efi/boot.c | 3 ++- xen/arch/x86/traps.c | 3 ++- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/efi/boot.c b/xen/arch/x86/efi/boot.c index 0dd935c..602cc12 100644 --- a/xen/arch/x86/efi/boot.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/efi/boot.c @@ -201,7 +201,8 @@ static void __init __attribute__((__noreturn__)) blexit(const CHAR16 *str) efi_bs->FreePages(xsm.addr, PFN_UP(xsm.size)); efi_bs->Exit(efi_ih, EFI_SUCCESS, 0, NULL); - for( ; ; ); /* not reached */ + for ( ; ; ) /* not reached */ + halt(); } /* generic routine for printing error messages */ diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/traps.c b/xen/arch/x86/traps.c index d8b3eac..8c355e5 100644 --- a/xen/arch/x86/traps.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/traps.c @@ -1448,7 +1448,8 @@ void __init do_early_page_fault(struct cpu_user_regs *regs) printk("Stack dump: "); while ( ((long)stk & ((PAGE_SIZE - 1) & ~(BYTES_PER_LONG - 1))) != 0 ) printk("%p ", _p(*stk++)); - for ( ; ; ) ; + for ( ; ; ) + halt(); } } -- 1.7.10.4
Jan Beulich
2013-Dec-02 15:03 UTC
Re: [PATCH] xen/x86: Be more power-efficient when waiting forever
>>> On 02.12.13 at 15:38, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote: > There is one final for(;;); loop, but is in common code and immediately > following a call to panic(), so is actually dead code and will be cleaned up > in v2 of my "noreturn" series at the start of 4.5In the context of this, this one ...> --- a/xen/arch/x86/efi/boot.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/efi/boot.c > @@ -201,7 +201,8 @@ static void __init __attribute__((__noreturn__)) > blexit(const CHAR16 *str) > efi_bs->FreePages(xsm.addr, PFN_UP(xsm.size)); > > efi_bs->Exit(efi_ih, EFI_SUCCESS, 0, NULL); > - for( ; ; ); /* not reached */ > + for ( ; ; ) /* not reached */ > + halt();... seems pointless (but of course also not wrong).> --- a/xen/arch/x86/traps.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/traps.c > @@ -1448,7 +1448,8 @@ void __init do_early_page_fault(struct cpu_user_regs *regs) > printk("Stack dump: "); > while ( ((long)stk & ((PAGE_SIZE - 1) & ~(BYTES_PER_LONG - 1))) != 0 ) > printk("%p ", _p(*stk++)); > - for ( ; ; ) ; > + for ( ; ; ) > + halt();While clearly this one is desirable. Jan
Andrew Cooper
2013-Dec-02 15:06 UTC
Re: [PATCH] xen/x86: Be more power-efficient when waiting forever
On 02/12/13 15:03, Jan Beulich wrote:>>>> On 02.12.13 at 15:38, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote: >> There is one final for(;;); loop, but is in common code and immediately >> following a call to panic(), so is actually dead code and will be cleaned up >> in v2 of my "noreturn" series at the start of 4.5 > In the context of this, this one ... > >> --- a/xen/arch/x86/efi/boot.c >> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/efi/boot.c >> @@ -201,7 +201,8 @@ static void __init __attribute__((__noreturn__)) >> blexit(const CHAR16 *str) >> efi_bs->FreePages(xsm.addr, PFN_UP(xsm.size)); >> >> efi_bs->Exit(efi_ih, EFI_SUCCESS, 0, NULL); >> - for( ; ; ); /* not reached */ >> + for ( ; ; ) /* not reached */ >> + halt(); > ... seems pointless (but of course also not wrong).I suppose - I guess all that is needed here is for the compiler to find no way to the end of this function. I wonder whether an "unreachable()" would suffice? In the optimal case, the compiler should not emit any instructions for it. ~Andrew> >> --- a/xen/arch/x86/traps.c >> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/traps.c >> @@ -1448,7 +1448,8 @@ void __init do_early_page_fault(struct cpu_user_regs *regs) >> printk("Stack dump: "); >> while ( ((long)stk & ((PAGE_SIZE - 1) & ~(BYTES_PER_LONG - 1))) != 0 ) >> printk("%p ", _p(*stk++)); >> - for ( ; ; ) ; >> + for ( ; ; ) >> + halt(); > While clearly this one is desirable. > > Jan >
Keir Fraser
2013-Dec-02 15:23 UTC
Re: [PATCH] xen/x86: Be more power-efficient when waiting forever
On 02/12/2013 14:38, "Andrew Cooper" <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:> The effect is unchanged, but the processor will be spending most of its time > in the C1 or C1E power state rather than C0. > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> > CC: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org> > CC: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com> > CC: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>Acked-by: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>> --- > > This was discovered while I was playing about in the early_page_fault() > handler with the IBM box which was corruption the Xen code section. > > There is one final for(;;); loop, but is in common code and immediately > following a call to panic(), so is actually dead code and will be cleaned up > in v2 of my "noreturn" series at the start of 4.5 > > George: I am requesting that this get a freeze exception, under the > qualification of #2 "An awesome release", given no function change threatening > --- > xen/arch/x86/efi/boot.c | 3 ++- > xen/arch/x86/traps.c | 3 ++- > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/efi/boot.c b/xen/arch/x86/efi/boot.c > index 0dd935c..602cc12 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/x86/efi/boot.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/efi/boot.c > @@ -201,7 +201,8 @@ static void __init __attribute__((__noreturn__)) > blexit(const CHAR16 *str) > efi_bs->FreePages(xsm.addr, PFN_UP(xsm.size)); > > efi_bs->Exit(efi_ih, EFI_SUCCESS, 0, NULL); > - for( ; ; ); /* not reached */ > + for ( ; ; ) /* not reached */ > + halt(); > } > > /* generic routine for printing error messages */ > diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/traps.c b/xen/arch/x86/traps.c > index d8b3eac..8c355e5 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/x86/traps.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/traps.c > @@ -1448,7 +1448,8 @@ void __init do_early_page_fault(struct cpu_user_regs > *regs) > printk("Stack dump: "); > while ( ((long)stk & ((PAGE_SIZE - 1) & ~(BYTES_PER_LONG - 1))) != 0 > ) > printk("%p ", _p(*stk++)); > - for ( ; ; ) ; > + for ( ; ; ) > + halt(); > } > } >