Zoltan Kiss
2013-Nov-29 18:56 UTC
[PATCH net-next] xen-netback: Fix pull size in checksum_setup_ip*
Before checksum setup we need to make sure we have enough data in linear buffer, so we do a pull if not. The calculation of the required data counts with skb->network_header, which is the headroom size actually. This is not necessary, and can cause unreasonable pulling. I''ve also removed MAX_IPOPTLEN, as we only need the base header at that point. Signed-off-by: Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@citrix.com> --- drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c | 24 ++++++++---------------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c index 919b650..adadf76 100644 --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c @@ -1169,8 +1169,7 @@ static int checksum_setup_ip(struct xenvif *vif, struct sk_buff *skb, off = sizeof(struct iphdr); - header_size = skb->network_header + off + MAX_IPOPTLEN; - maybe_pull_tail(skb, header_size); + maybe_pull_tail(skb, off); off = iph->ihl * 4; @@ -1183,8 +1182,7 @@ static int checksum_setup_ip(struct xenvif *vif, struct sk_buff *skb, if (recalculate_partial_csum) { struct tcphdr *tcph = tcp_hdr(skb); - header_size = skb->network_header + - off + + header_size = off + sizeof(struct tcphdr); maybe_pull_tail(skb, header_size); @@ -1201,8 +1199,7 @@ static int checksum_setup_ip(struct xenvif *vif, struct sk_buff *skb, if (recalculate_partial_csum) { struct udphdr *udph = udp_hdr(skb); - header_size = skb->network_header + - off + + header_size = off + sizeof(struct udphdr); maybe_pull_tail(skb, header_size); @@ -1241,8 +1238,7 @@ static int checksum_setup_ipv6(struct xenvif *vif, struct sk_buff *skb, off = sizeof(struct ipv6hdr); - header_size = skb->network_header + off; - maybe_pull_tail(skb, header_size); + maybe_pull_tail(skb, off); nexthdr = ipv6h->nexthdr; @@ -1254,8 +1250,7 @@ static int checksum_setup_ipv6(struct xenvif *vif, struct sk_buff *skb, case IPPROTO_ROUTING: { struct ipv6_opt_hdr *hp = (void *)(skb->data + off); - header_size = skb->network_header + - off + + header_size = off + sizeof(struct ipv6_opt_hdr); maybe_pull_tail(skb, header_size); @@ -1266,8 +1261,7 @@ static int checksum_setup_ipv6(struct xenvif *vif, struct sk_buff *skb, case IPPROTO_AH: { struct ip_auth_hdr *hp = (void *)(skb->data + off); - header_size = skb->network_header + - off + + header_size = off + sizeof(struct ip_auth_hdr); maybe_pull_tail(skb, header_size); @@ -1305,8 +1299,7 @@ static int checksum_setup_ipv6(struct xenvif *vif, struct sk_buff *skb, if (recalculate_partial_csum) { struct tcphdr *tcph = tcp_hdr(skb); - header_size = skb->network_header + - off + + header_size = off + sizeof(struct tcphdr); maybe_pull_tail(skb, header_size); @@ -1324,8 +1317,7 @@ static int checksum_setup_ipv6(struct xenvif *vif, struct sk_buff *skb, if (recalculate_partial_csum) { struct udphdr *udph = udp_hdr(skb); - header_size = skb->network_header + - off + + header_size = off + sizeof(struct udphdr); maybe_pull_tail(skb, header_size);
Zoltan Kiss
2013-Nov-29 20:26 UTC
Re: [PATCH net-next] xen-netback: Fix pull size in checksum_setup_ip*
Or would it make sense to drop header_size and use off + something as function parameters? Zoli On 29/11/13 18:56, Zoltan Kiss wrote:> Before checksum setup we need to make sure we have enough data in linear > buffer, so we do a pull if not. The calculation of the required data counts > with skb->network_header, which is the headroom size actually. This is not > necessary, and can cause unreasonable pulling. I''ve also removed > MAX_IPOPTLEN, as we only need the base header at that point. > > Signed-off-by: Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@citrix.com> > > --- > drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c | 24 ++++++++---------------- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c > index 919b650..adadf76 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c > +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c > @@ -1169,8 +1169,7 @@ static int checksum_setup_ip(struct xenvif *vif, struct sk_buff *skb, > > off = sizeof(struct iphdr); > > - header_size = skb->network_header + off + MAX_IPOPTLEN; > - maybe_pull_tail(skb, header_size); > + maybe_pull_tail(skb, off); > > off = iph->ihl * 4; > > @@ -1183,8 +1182,7 @@ static int checksum_setup_ip(struct xenvif *vif, struct sk_buff *skb, > if (recalculate_partial_csum) { > struct tcphdr *tcph = tcp_hdr(skb); > > - header_size = skb->network_header + > - off + > + header_size = off + > sizeof(struct tcphdr); > maybe_pull_tail(skb, header_size); > > @@ -1201,8 +1199,7 @@ static int checksum_setup_ip(struct xenvif *vif, struct sk_buff *skb, > if (recalculate_partial_csum) { > struct udphdr *udph = udp_hdr(skb); > > - header_size = skb->network_header + > - off + > + header_size = off + > sizeof(struct udphdr); > maybe_pull_tail(skb, header_size); > > @@ -1241,8 +1238,7 @@ static int checksum_setup_ipv6(struct xenvif *vif, struct sk_buff *skb, > > off = sizeof(struct ipv6hdr); > > - header_size = skb->network_header + off; > - maybe_pull_tail(skb, header_size); > + maybe_pull_tail(skb, off); > > nexthdr = ipv6h->nexthdr; > > @@ -1254,8 +1250,7 @@ static int checksum_setup_ipv6(struct xenvif *vif, struct sk_buff *skb, > case IPPROTO_ROUTING: { > struct ipv6_opt_hdr *hp = (void *)(skb->data + off); > > - header_size = skb->network_header + > - off + > + header_size = off + > sizeof(struct ipv6_opt_hdr); > maybe_pull_tail(skb, header_size); > > @@ -1266,8 +1261,7 @@ static int checksum_setup_ipv6(struct xenvif *vif, struct sk_buff *skb, > case IPPROTO_AH: { > struct ip_auth_hdr *hp = (void *)(skb->data + off); > > - header_size = skb->network_header + > - off + > + header_size = off + > sizeof(struct ip_auth_hdr); > maybe_pull_tail(skb, header_size); > > @@ -1305,8 +1299,7 @@ static int checksum_setup_ipv6(struct xenvif *vif, struct sk_buff *skb, > if (recalculate_partial_csum) { > struct tcphdr *tcph = tcp_hdr(skb); > > - header_size = skb->network_header + > - off + > + header_size = off + > sizeof(struct tcphdr); > maybe_pull_tail(skb, header_size); > > @@ -1324,8 +1317,7 @@ static int checksum_setup_ipv6(struct xenvif *vif, struct sk_buff *skb, > if (recalculate_partial_csum) { > struct udphdr *udph = udp_hdr(skb); > > - header_size = skb->network_header + > - off + > + header_size = off + > sizeof(struct udphdr); > maybe_pull_tail(skb, header_size); > >
David Miller
2013-Nov-30 21:10 UTC
Re: [PATCH net-next] xen-netback: Fix pull size in checksum_setup_ip*
From: Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@citrix.com> Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 18:56:47 +0000> Before checksum setup we need to make sure we have enough data in linear > buffer, so we do a pull if not. The calculation of the required data counts > with skb->network_header, which is the headroom size actually. This is not > necessary, and can cause unreasonable pulling. I''ve also removed > MAX_IPOPTLEN, as we only need the base header at that point. > > Signed-off-by: Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@citrix.com>The net-next tree is no open, therefore it is not appropriate to submit patches targetting to that tree at this time. I will make an explicit announcement on netdev when I have openned the net-next tree, so it will be clear exactly when you can submit patches targetting that tree again. Thank you.
Paul Durrant
2013-Dec-02 09:42 UTC
Re: [PATCH net-next] xen-netback: Fix pull size in checksum_setup_ip*
> -----Original Message----- > From: Zoltan Kiss > Sent: 29 November 2013 20:26 > To: Ian Campbell; Wei Liu; xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; > netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Jonathan Davies; > Paul Durrant > Cc: Zoltan Kiss > Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] xen-netback: Fix pull size in > checksum_setup_ip* > > Or would it make sense to drop header_size and use off + something as > function parameters? >Possibly best not to top-post to your own thread ;-) Agreed; now that we''ve gone from mostly 3 variable additions to 2, I don''t think we need header_size to neaten things up any more. Paul> Zoli > > On 29/11/13 18:56, Zoltan Kiss wrote: > > Before checksum setup we need to make sure we have enough data in > linear > > buffer, so we do a pull if not. The calculation of the required data counts > > with skb->network_header, which is the headroom size actually. This is not > > necessary, and can cause unreasonable pulling. I''ve also removed > > MAX_IPOPTLEN, as we only need the base header at that point. > > > > Signed-off-by: Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@citrix.com> > > > > --- > > drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c | 24 ++++++++---------------- > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c b/drivers/net/xen- > netback/netback.c > > index 919b650..adadf76 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c > > +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c > > @@ -1169,8 +1169,7 @@ static int checksum_setup_ip(struct xenvif *vif, > struct sk_buff *skb, > > > > off = sizeof(struct iphdr); > > > > - header_size = skb->network_header + off + MAX_IPOPTLEN; > > - maybe_pull_tail(skb, header_size); > > + maybe_pull_tail(skb, off); > > > > off = iph->ihl * 4; > > > > @@ -1183,8 +1182,7 @@ static int checksum_setup_ip(struct xenvif *vif, > struct sk_buff *skb, > > if (recalculate_partial_csum) { > > struct tcphdr *tcph = tcp_hdr(skb); > > > > - header_size = skb->network_header + > > - off + > > + header_size = off + > > sizeof(struct tcphdr); > > maybe_pull_tail(skb, header_size); > > > > @@ -1201,8 +1199,7 @@ static int checksum_setup_ip(struct xenvif *vif, > struct sk_buff *skb, > > if (recalculate_partial_csum) { > > struct udphdr *udph = udp_hdr(skb); > > > > - header_size = skb->network_header + > > - off + > > + header_size = off + > > sizeof(struct udphdr); > > maybe_pull_tail(skb, header_size); > > > > @@ -1241,8 +1238,7 @@ static int checksum_setup_ipv6(struct xenvif *vif, > struct sk_buff *skb, > > > > off = sizeof(struct ipv6hdr); > > > > - header_size = skb->network_header + off; > > - maybe_pull_tail(skb, header_size); > > + maybe_pull_tail(skb, off); > > > > nexthdr = ipv6h->nexthdr; > > > > @@ -1254,8 +1250,7 @@ static int checksum_setup_ipv6(struct xenvif *vif, > struct sk_buff *skb, > > case IPPROTO_ROUTING: { > > struct ipv6_opt_hdr *hp = (void *)(skb->data + off); > > > > - header_size = skb->network_header + > > - off + > > + header_size = off + > > sizeof(struct ipv6_opt_hdr); > > maybe_pull_tail(skb, header_size); > > > > @@ -1266,8 +1261,7 @@ static int checksum_setup_ipv6(struct xenvif *vif, > struct sk_buff *skb, > > case IPPROTO_AH: { > > struct ip_auth_hdr *hp = (void *)(skb->data + off); > > > > - header_size = skb->network_header + > > - off + > > + header_size = off + > > sizeof(struct ip_auth_hdr); > > maybe_pull_tail(skb, header_size); > > > > @@ -1305,8 +1299,7 @@ static int checksum_setup_ipv6(struct xenvif *vif, > struct sk_buff *skb, > > if (recalculate_partial_csum) { > > struct tcphdr *tcph = tcp_hdr(skb); > > > > - header_size = skb->network_header + > > - off + > > + header_size = off + > > sizeof(struct tcphdr); > > maybe_pull_tail(skb, header_size); > > > > @@ -1324,8 +1317,7 @@ static int checksum_setup_ipv6(struct xenvif *vif, > struct sk_buff *skb, > > if (recalculate_partial_csum) { > > struct udphdr *udph = udp_hdr(skb); > > > > - header_size = skb->network_header + > > - off + > > + header_size = off + > > sizeof(struct udphdr); > > maybe_pull_tail(skb, header_size); > > > >
Paul Durrant
2013-Dec-02 13:04 UTC
Re: [PATCH net-next] xen-netback: Fix pull size in checksum_setup_ip*
> -----Original Message----- > From: David Miller [mailto:davem@davemloft.net] > Sent: 30 November 2013 21:10 > To: Zoltan Kiss > Cc: Ian Campbell; Wei Liu; xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; > netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Jonathan Davies; > Paul Durrant > Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] xen-netback: Fix pull size in > checksum_setup_ip* > > From: Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@citrix.com> > Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 18:56:47 +0000 > > > Before checksum setup we need to make sure we have enough data in > linear > > buffer, so we do a pull if not. The calculation of the required data counts > > with skb->network_header, which is the headroom size actually. This is not > > necessary, and can cause unreasonable pulling. I''ve also removed > > MAX_IPOPTLEN, as we only need the base header at that point. > > > > Signed-off-by: Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@citrix.com> > > The net-next tree is no open, therefore it is not appropriate to submit > patches targetting to that tree at this time. > > I will make an explicit announcement on netdev when I have openned > the net-next tree, so it will be clear exactly when you can submit > patches targetting that tree again. > > Thank you.I think this patch should be for net rather than net-next anyway. Since it appears that maybe_pull_tail() has bigger problems I''ll incorporate this fix as part of v4 of the fix for fragment detection. Paul