On 12/11/2013 13:18, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:
> ... as being generally insufficient: Either has_arch_pdevs() or
> cache_flush_permitted() should be used (in particular, it is
> insufficient to consider MMIO ranges alone - I/O port ranges have the
> same requirements if available to a guest).
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Acked-by: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/svm.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/svm.c
> @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@
> #include <asm/debugreg.h>
> #include <asm/msr.h>
> #include <asm/i387.h>
> +#include <asm/iocap.h>
> #include <asm/spinlock.h>
> #include <asm/hvm/emulate.h>
> #include <asm/hvm/hvm.h>
> @@ -1973,7 +1974,7 @@ static void wbinvd_ipi(void *info)
>
> static void svm_wbinvd_intercept(void)
> {
> - if ( has_arch_mmios(current->domain) )
> + if ( cache_flush_permitted(current->domain) )
> on_each_cpu(wbinvd_ipi, NULL, 1);
> }
>
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
> #include <xen/perfc.h>
> #include <asm/current.h>
> #include <asm/io.h>
> +#include <asm/iocap.h>
> #include <asm/regs.h>
> #include <asm/cpufeature.h>
> #include <asm/processor.h>
> @@ -2236,10 +2237,7 @@ static void wbinvd_ipi(void *info)
>
> static void vmx_wbinvd_intercept(void)
> {
> - if ( !has_arch_mmios(current->domain) )
> - return;
> -
> - if ( iommu_snoop )
> + if ( !cache_flush_permitted(current->domain) || iommu_snoop )
> return;
>
> if ( cpu_has_wbinvd_exiting )
> --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/domain.h
> +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/domain.h
> @@ -316,7 +316,6 @@ struct arch_domain
> } __cacheline_aligned;
>
> #define has_arch_pdevs(d) (!list_empty(&(d)->arch.pdev_list))
> -#define has_arch_mmios(d) (!rangeset_is_empty((d)->iomem_caps))
>
> #define gdt_ldt_pt_idx(v) \
> ((v)->vcpu_id >> (PAGETABLE_ORDER - GDT_LDT_VCPU_SHIFT))
>
>
>