I''ve left intentionally these indentations in this way, to improve
readability of previous patches.
Signed-off-by: Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@citrix.com>
---
drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c | 14 +++++++-------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
index c91dd36..204fa46 100644
--- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
+++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
@@ -882,8 +882,8 @@ static struct gnttab_map_grant_ref
*xenvif_get_requests(struct xenvif *vif,
for (shinfo->nr_frags = start; shinfo->nr_frags < nr_slots;
shinfo->nr_frags++, txp++, gop++) {
- index = pending_index(vif->pending_cons++);
- pending_idx = vif->pending_ring[index];
+ index = pending_index(vif->pending_cons++);
+ pending_idx = vif->pending_ring[index];
xenvif_tx_create_gop(vif, pending_idx, txp, gop);
frag_set_pending_idx(&frags[shinfo->nr_frags], pending_idx);
}
@@ -929,7 +929,7 @@ static int xenvif_tx_check_gop(struct xenvif *vif,
tx_info = &vif->pending_tx_info[pending_idx];
/* Check error status: if okay then remember grant handle. */
- newerr = (++gop)->status;
+ newerr = (++gop)->status;
if (likely(!newerr)) {
if (vif->grant_tx_handle[pending_idx] !@@ -1717,10 +1717,10 @@ static
void xenvif_idx_release(struct xenvif *vif, u16 pending_idx,
struct pending_tx_info *pending_tx_info;
pending_ring_idx_t index;
- pending_tx_info = &vif->pending_tx_info[pending_idx];
- make_tx_response(vif, &pending_tx_info->req, status);
- index = pending_index(vif->pending_prod++);
- vif->pending_ring[index] = pending_idx;
+ pending_tx_info = &vif->pending_tx_info[pending_idx];
+ make_tx_response(vif, &pending_tx_info->req, status);
+ index = pending_index(vif->pending_prod++);
+ vif->pending_ring[index] = pending_idx;
}
void xenvif_idx_unmap(struct xenvif *vif, u16 pending_idx)
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 12:50:19AM +0000, Zoltan Kiss wrote:> I''ve left intentionally these indentations in this way, to improve readability of previous patches. >Apparently this doesn''t deserve a single patch -- please squash it when you post non-RFC series. Wei.
Zoltan Kiss
2013-Oct-31 19:48 UTC
Re: [PATCH net-next RFC 4/5] xen-netback: Fix indentations
On 30/10/13 11:13, Wei Liu wrote:> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 12:50:19AM +0000, Zoltan Kiss wrote: >> I''ve left intentionally these indentations in this way, to improve readability of previous patches. >> > > Apparently this doesn''t deserve a single patch -- please squash it when > you post non-RFC series. > > Wei. >Yep, I just want to keep them separately until the series get it''s final form. Zoli