Jan, are you planning to do a Xen 4.3.1 at some point, or are you expecting somebody else to pick this up? Xen 4.3.0 has been out for a while, and we had 4.1.x and 4.2.x updates since. Lars
>>> On 26.09.13 at 17:56, Lars Kurth <lars.kurth@xen.org> wrote: > are you planning to do a Xen 4.3.1 at some point, or are you expecting > somebody else to pick this up? Xen 4.3.0 has been out for a while, and > we had 4.1.x and 4.2.x updates since.I''m planning to, and would have tried to move to RC1 already if Ian J wasn''t out of the office for another little while. Jan
>>> On 26.09.13 at 18:00, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote: >>>> On 26.09.13 at 17:56, Lars Kurth <lars.kurth@xen.org> wrote: >> are you planning to do a Xen 4.3.1 at some point, or are you expecting >> somebody else to pick this up? Xen 4.3.0 has been out for a while, and >> we had 4.1.x and 4.2.x updates since. > > I''m planning to, and would have tried to move to RC1 already if > Ian J wasn''t out of the office for another little while.Actually, after just having check the qemu trees and hiving found that there''s nothing new in them since 4.3.0, we could go ahead despite IanJ''s absence. So I''ll send out a "last call" for backport requests, and if there''s no urgent (or trivial) tools side thing popping up (or if IanC could help out if necessary) we could perhaps aim at an RC1 some time next week. Jan
On Fri, 2013-09-27 at 11:04 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:> >>> On 26.09.13 at 18:00, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote: > >>>> On 26.09.13 at 17:56, Lars Kurth <lars.kurth@xen.org> wrote: > >> are you planning to do a Xen 4.3.1 at some point, or are you expecting > >> somebody else to pick this up? Xen 4.3.0 has been out for a while, and > >> we had 4.1.x and 4.2.x updates since. > > > > I''m planning to, and would have tried to move to RC1 already if > > Ian J wasn''t out of the office for another little while. > > Actually, after just having check the qemu trees and hiving found > that there''s nothing new in them since 4.3.0, we could go ahead > despite IanJ''s absence. So I''ll send out a "last call" for backport > requests, and if there''s no urgent (or trivial) tools side thing > popping up (or if IanC could help out if necessary) we could > perhaps aim at an RC1 some time next week.I''m more than happy to try, let me know if you need something and I''ll see if I can figure out how... Ian.