liguang
2013-Jun-04 08:05 UTC
[PATCH 1/2] acpi/processor: remove bm_rld_set of acpi_processor_flags
bm_rld_set seems obsolete now Signed-off-by: liguang <lig.fnst at cn.fujitsu.com> --- include/acpi/processor.h | 1 - 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/acpi/processor.h b/include/acpi/processor.h index ea69367..cfec509 100644 --- a/include/acpi/processor.h +++ b/include/acpi/processor.h @@ -188,7 +188,6 @@ struct acpi_processor_flags { u8 bm_check:1; u8 has_cst:1; u8 power_setup_done:1; - u8 bm_rld_set:1; u8 need_hotplug_init:1; }; -- 1.7.2.5
bm_rld_set seems obsolete now Signed-off-by: liguang <lig.fnst at cn.fujitsu.com> --- include/xen/interface/platform.h | 1 - 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/xen/interface/platform.h b/include/xen/interface/platform.h index c57d5f6..7ffff33 100644 --- a/include/xen/interface/platform.h +++ b/include/xen/interface/platform.h @@ -240,7 +240,6 @@ struct xen_processor_flags { uint32_t bm_check:1; uint32_t has_cst:1; uint32_t power_setup_done:1; - uint32_t bm_rld_set:1; }; struct xen_processor_power { -- 1.7.2.5
Jan Beulich
2013-Jun-04 08:13 UTC
[PATCH 2/2] xen: remove bm_rld_set of xen_processor_flags
>>> On 04.06.13 at 10:05, liguang <lig.fnst at cn.fujitsu.com> wrote: > bm_rld_set seems obsolete now > > Signed-off-by: liguang <lig.fnst at cn.fujitsu.com> > --- > include/xen/interface/platform.h | 1 - > 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/xen/interface/platform.h > b/include/xen/interface/platform.h > index c57d5f6..7ffff33 100644 > --- a/include/xen/interface/platform.h > +++ b/include/xen/interface/platform.h > @@ -240,7 +240,6 @@ struct xen_processor_flags { > uint32_t bm_check:1; > uint32_t has_cst:1; > uint32_t power_setup_done:1; > - uint32_t bm_rld_set:1; > }; > > struct xen_processor_power {Any such patch would need to be submitted against the master copy of the header (in the Xen repo), and by recognizing that you'd also notice that this is part of a public ABI, and hence can't be removed, but at best can be documented as obsolete. Of course you'd first need to check whether the hypervisor makes any use of that bit when passed down from Dom0. Jan
Reasonably Related Threads
- [PATCH 1/2] acpi/processor: remove bm_rld_set of acpi_processor_flags
- [PATCH 1/2] acpi/processor: remove bm_rld_set of acpi_processor_flags
- [RFC PATCH] Exporting ACPI Pxx/Cxx states to other kernel subsystems (v1).
- [PATCH] x86/idle: reduce contention on ACPI register accesses
- [PATCH] xen/cpuidle: Reduce logging level for unknown apic_ids