Wei Liu
2013-May-21 18:35 UTC
[PATCH net-next V2 1/2] xen-netback: split event channels support for Xen backend driver
Netback and netfront only use one event channel to do TX / RX notification, which may cause unnecessary wake-up of processing routines. This patch adds a new feature called feature-split-event-channels to netback, enabling it to handle TX and RX events separately. Netback will use tx_irq to notify guest for TX completion, rx_irq for RX notification. If frontend doesn''t support this feature, tx_irq equals to rx_irq. Signed-off-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com> --- drivers/net/xen-netback/common.h | 13 ++++-- drivers/net/xen-netback/interface.c | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c | 14 ++++-- drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c | 40 ++++++++++++++--- 4 files changed, 122 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/common.h b/drivers/net/xen-netback/common.h index 6102a6c..1ae2932 100644 --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/common.h +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/common.h @@ -57,8 +57,12 @@ struct xenvif { u8 fe_dev_addr[6]; - /* Physical parameters of the comms window. */ - unsigned int irq; + /* When feature-split-event-channels = 0, tx_irq = rx_irq. */ + unsigned int tx_irq; + unsigned int rx_irq; + /* Only used when feature-split-event-channels = 1 */ + char tx_irq_name[IFNAMSIZ+4]; /* DEVNAME-tx */ + char rx_irq_name[IFNAMSIZ+4]; /* DEVNAME-rx */ /* List of frontends to notify after a batch of frames sent. */ struct list_head notify_list; @@ -113,7 +117,8 @@ struct xenvif *xenvif_alloc(struct device *parent, unsigned int handle); int xenvif_connect(struct xenvif *vif, unsigned long tx_ring_ref, - unsigned long rx_ring_ref, unsigned int evtchn); + unsigned long rx_ring_ref, unsigned int tx_evtchn, + unsigned int rx_evtchn); void xenvif_disconnect(struct xenvif *vif); void xenvif_get(struct xenvif *vif); @@ -158,4 +163,6 @@ void xenvif_carrier_off(struct xenvif *vif); /* Returns number of ring slots required to send an skb to the frontend */ unsigned int xen_netbk_count_skb_slots(struct xenvif *vif, struct sk_buff *skb); +extern unsigned int feature_split_event_channels; + #endif /* __XEN_NETBACK__COMMON_H__ */ diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/interface.c b/drivers/net/xen-netback/interface.c index 82202c2..59d5b45 100644 --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/interface.c +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/interface.c @@ -60,21 +60,39 @@ static int xenvif_rx_schedulable(struct xenvif *vif) return xenvif_schedulable(vif) && !xen_netbk_rx_ring_full(vif); } -static irqreturn_t xenvif_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id) +static irqreturn_t xenvif_tx_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id) { struct xenvif *vif = dev_id; if (vif->netbk == NULL) - return IRQ_NONE; + return IRQ_HANDLED; xen_netbk_schedule_xenvif(vif); + return IRQ_HANDLED; +} + +static irqreturn_t xenvif_rx_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id) +{ + struct xenvif *vif = dev_id; + + if (vif->netbk == NULL) + return IRQ_HANDLED; + if (xenvif_rx_schedulable(vif)) netif_wake_queue(vif->dev); return IRQ_HANDLED; } +static irqreturn_t xenvif_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id) +{ + xenvif_tx_interrupt(irq, dev_id); + xenvif_rx_interrupt(irq, dev_id); + + return IRQ_HANDLED; +} + static int xenvif_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev) { struct xenvif *vif = netdev_priv(dev); @@ -125,13 +143,15 @@ static struct net_device_stats *xenvif_get_stats(struct net_device *dev) static void xenvif_up(struct xenvif *vif) { xen_netbk_add_xenvif(vif); - enable_irq(vif->irq); + enable_irq(vif->tx_irq); + enable_irq(vif->rx_irq); xen_netbk_check_rx_xenvif(vif); } static void xenvif_down(struct xenvif *vif) { - disable_irq(vif->irq); + disable_irq(vif->tx_irq); + disable_irq(vif->rx_irq); del_timer_sync(&vif->credit_timeout); xen_netbk_deschedule_xenvif(vif); xen_netbk_remove_xenvif(vif); @@ -308,12 +328,13 @@ struct xenvif *xenvif_alloc(struct device *parent, domid_t domid, } int xenvif_connect(struct xenvif *vif, unsigned long tx_ring_ref, - unsigned long rx_ring_ref, unsigned int evtchn) + unsigned long rx_ring_ref, unsigned int tx_evtchn, + unsigned int rx_evtchn) { int err = -ENOMEM; /* Already connected through? */ - if (vif->irq) + if (vif->tx_irq) return 0; __module_get(THIS_MODULE); @@ -322,13 +343,38 @@ int xenvif_connect(struct xenvif *vif, unsigned long tx_ring_ref, if (err < 0) goto err; - err = bind_interdomain_evtchn_to_irqhandler( - vif->domid, evtchn, xenvif_interrupt, 0, - vif->dev->name, vif); - if (err < 0) - goto err_unmap; - vif->irq = err; - disable_irq(vif->irq); + if (tx_evtchn == rx_evtchn) { + /* feature-split-event-channels == 0 */ + err = bind_interdomain_evtchn_to_irqhandler( + vif->domid, tx_evtchn, xenvif_interrupt, 0, + vif->dev->name, vif); + if (err < 0) + goto err_unmap; + vif->tx_irq = vif->rx_irq = err; + disable_irq(vif->tx_irq); + disable_irq(vif->rx_irq); + } else { + /* feature-split-event-channels == 1 */ + snprintf(vif->tx_irq_name, sizeof(vif->tx_irq_name), + "%s-tx", vif->dev->name); + err = bind_interdomain_evtchn_to_irqhandler( + vif->domid, tx_evtchn, xenvif_tx_interrupt, 0, + vif->tx_irq_name, vif); + if (err < 0) + goto err_unmap; + vif->tx_irq = err; + disable_irq(vif->tx_irq); + + snprintf(vif->rx_irq_name, sizeof(vif->rx_irq_name), + "%s-rx", vif->dev->name); + err = bind_interdomain_evtchn_to_irqhandler( + vif->domid, rx_evtchn, xenvif_rx_interrupt, 0, + vif->rx_irq_name, vif); + if (err < 0) + goto err_tx_unbind; + vif->rx_irq = err; + disable_irq(vif->rx_irq); + } xenvif_get(vif); @@ -342,6 +388,9 @@ int xenvif_connect(struct xenvif *vif, unsigned long tx_ring_ref, rtnl_unlock(); return 0; +err_tx_unbind: + unbind_from_irqhandler(vif->tx_irq, vif); + vif->tx_irq = 0; err_unmap: xen_netbk_unmap_frontend_rings(vif); err: @@ -375,8 +424,13 @@ void xenvif_disconnect(struct xenvif *vif) atomic_dec(&vif->refcnt); wait_event(vif->waiting_to_free, atomic_read(&vif->refcnt) == 0); - if (vif->irq) { - unbind_from_irqhandler(vif->irq, vif); + if (vif->tx_irq) { + if (vif->tx_irq == vif->rx_irq) + unbind_from_irqhandler(vif->tx_irq, vif); + else { + unbind_from_irqhandler(vif->tx_irq, vif); + unbind_from_irqhandler(vif->rx_irq, vif); + } /* vif->irq is valid, we had a module_get in * xenvif_connect. */ diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c index 2d9477f..ccfbb74 100644 --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c @@ -47,6 +47,13 @@ #include <asm/xen/hypercall.h> #include <asm/xen/page.h> +/* Provide an option to disable split event channels at load time as + * event channels are limited resource. Split event channels are + * enabled by default. + */ +unsigned int feature_split_event_channels = 1; +module_param(feature_split_event_channels, uint, 0644); + /* * This is the maximum slots a skb can have. If a guest sends a skb * which exceeds this limit it is considered malicious. @@ -662,7 +669,7 @@ static void xen_netbk_rx_action(struct xen_netbk *netbk) { struct xenvif *vif = NULL, *tmp; s8 status; - u16 irq, flags; + u16 flags; struct xen_netif_rx_response *resp; struct sk_buff_head rxq; struct sk_buff *skb; @@ -771,7 +778,6 @@ static void xen_netbk_rx_action(struct xen_netbk *netbk) sco->meta_slots_used); RING_PUSH_RESPONSES_AND_CHECK_NOTIFY(&vif->rx, ret); - irq = vif->irq; if (ret && list_empty(&vif->notify_list)) list_add_tail(&vif->notify_list, ¬ify); @@ -783,7 +789,7 @@ static void xen_netbk_rx_action(struct xen_netbk *netbk) } list_for_each_entry_safe(vif, tmp, ¬ify, notify_list) { - notify_remote_via_irq(vif->irq); + notify_remote_via_irq(vif->rx_irq); list_del_init(&vif->notify_list); } @@ -1762,7 +1768,7 @@ static void make_tx_response(struct xenvif *vif, vif->tx.rsp_prod_pvt = ++i; RING_PUSH_RESPONSES_AND_CHECK_NOTIFY(&vif->tx, notify); if (notify) - notify_remote_via_irq(vif->irq); + notify_remote_via_irq(vif->tx_irq); } static struct xen_netif_rx_response *make_rx_response(struct xenvif *vif, diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c b/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c index d230c14..461efc6 100644 --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c @@ -114,6 +114,15 @@ static int netback_probe(struct xenbus_device *dev, goto abort_transaction; } + /* Split event channels support */ + err = xenbus_printf(xbt, dev->nodename, + "feature-split-event-channels", + "%u", feature_split_event_channels); + if (err) { + message = "writing feature-split-event-channels"; + goto abort_transaction; + } + err = xenbus_transaction_end(xbt, 0); } while (err == -EAGAIN); @@ -393,21 +402,36 @@ static int connect_rings(struct backend_info *be) struct xenvif *vif = be->vif; struct xenbus_device *dev = be->dev; unsigned long tx_ring_ref, rx_ring_ref; - unsigned int evtchn, rx_copy; + unsigned int tx_evtchn, rx_evtchn, rx_copy; int err; int val; err = xenbus_gather(XBT_NIL, dev->otherend, "tx-ring-ref", "%lu", &tx_ring_ref, - "rx-ring-ref", "%lu", &rx_ring_ref, - "event-channel", "%u", &evtchn, NULL); + "rx-ring-ref", "%lu", &rx_ring_ref, NULL); if (err) { xenbus_dev_fatal(dev, err, - "reading %s/ring-ref and event-channel", + "reading %s/ring-ref", dev->otherend); return err; } + /* Try split event channels first, then single event channel. */ + err = xenbus_gather(XBT_NIL, dev->otherend, + "event-channel-tx", "%u", &tx_evtchn, + "event-channel-rx", "%u", &rx_evtchn, NULL); + if (err) { + err = xenbus_gather(XBT_NIL, dev->otherend, + "event-channel", "%u", &tx_evtchn, NULL); + if (err) { + xenbus_dev_fatal(dev, err, + "reading %s/event-channel(-tx/rx)", + dev->otherend); + return err; + } + rx_evtchn = tx_evtchn; + } + err = xenbus_scanf(XBT_NIL, dev->otherend, "request-rx-copy", "%u", &rx_copy); if (err == -ENOENT) { @@ -454,11 +478,13 @@ static int connect_rings(struct backend_info *be) vif->csum = !val; /* Map the shared frame, irq etc. */ - err = xenvif_connect(vif, tx_ring_ref, rx_ring_ref, evtchn); + err = xenvif_connect(vif, tx_ring_ref, rx_ring_ref, + tx_evtchn, rx_evtchn); if (err) { xenbus_dev_fatal(dev, err, - "mapping shared-frames %lu/%lu port %u", - tx_ring_ref, rx_ring_ref, evtchn); + "mapping shared-frames %lu/%lu port tx %u rx %u", + tx_ring_ref, rx_ring_ref, + tx_evtchn, rx_evtchn); return err; } return 0; -- 1.7.10.4
Jan Beulich
2013-May-22 08:05 UTC
Re: [PATCH net-next V2 1/2] xen-netback: split event channels support for Xen backend driver
>>> On 21.05.13 at 20:35, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com> wrote: > @@ -158,4 +163,6 @@ void xenvif_carrier_off(struct xenvif *vif); > /* Returns number of ring slots required to send an skb to the frontend */ > unsigned int xen_netbk_count_skb_slots(struct xenvif *vif, struct sk_buff *skb); > > +extern unsigned int feature_split_event_channels;This gets used exclusively as a boolean, so ought to be bool.> --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c > +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c > @@ -114,6 +114,15 @@ static int netback_probe(struct xenbus_device *dev, > goto abort_transaction; > } > > + /* Split event channels support */ > + err = xenbus_printf(xbt, dev->nodename, > + "feature-split-event-channels", > + "%u", feature_split_event_channels); > + if (err) { > + message = "writing feature-split-event-channels"; > + goto abort_transaction;We had this discussion elsewhere quite recently: Failure to write extension nodes should not be fatal - this needs to even be moved out of the containing loop afaict.> + /* Try split event channels first, then single event channel. */ > + err = xenbus_gather(XBT_NIL, dev->otherend, > + "event-channel-tx", "%u", &tx_evtchn, > + "event-channel-rx", "%u", &rx_evtchn, NULL); > + if (err) { > + err = xenbus_gather(XBT_NIL, dev->otherend, > + "event-channel", "%u", &tx_evtchn, NULL);And this got discussed quite recently too: Single item reads should use xenbus_scanf() as being the simpler interface doing better type checking. Jan
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-May-22 15:17 UTC
Re: [PATCH net-next V2 1/2] xen-netback: split event channels support for Xen backend driver
> +/* Provide an option to disable split event channels at load time as > + * event channels are limited resource. Split event channels are > + * enabled by default. > + */ > +unsigned int feature_split_event_channels = 1; > +module_param(feature_split_event_channels, uint, 0644);How about just ''seperate_tx_rx_irq'' ? Much easier to comprehend I think?
Wei Liu
2013-May-22 15:35 UTC
Re: [PATCH net-next V2 1/2] xen-netback: split event channels support for Xen backend driver
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 11:17:54AM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:> > +/* Provide an option to disable split event channels at load time as > > + * event channels are limited resource. Split event channels are > > + * enabled by default. > > + */ > > +unsigned int feature_split_event_channels = 1; > > +module_param(feature_split_event_channels, uint, 0644); > > How about just ''seperate_tx_rx_irq'' ? Much easier to comprehend I think?Sure. I''m not particularly picky about names and sometimes bad at picking a comprehensible name. But, I guess I should use "sepArate_tx_rx_irq" rather than "sepErate_tx_rx_irq". Wei.
annie li
2013-May-22 15:40 UTC
Re: [PATCH net-next V2 1/2] xen-netback: split event channels support for Xen backend driver
On 2013-5-21 14:35, Wei Liu wrote:> [....] > + > static int xenvif_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev) > { > struct xenvif *vif = netdev_priv(dev); > @@ -125,13 +143,15 @@ static struct net_device_stats *xenvif_get_stats(struct net_device *dev) > static void xenvif_up(struct xenvif *vif) > { > xen_netbk_add_xenvif(vif); > - enable_irq(vif->irq); > + enable_irq(vif->tx_irq); > + enable_irq(vif->rx_irq);enable_irq are called twice in one event channel situation. How about adding if condition here to differ one event channel and split event channel?> xen_netbk_check_rx_xenvif(vif); > } > > static void xenvif_down(struct xenvif *vif) > { > - disable_irq(vif->irq); > + disable_irq(vif->tx_irq); > + disable_irq(vif->rx_irq);Same as enable_irq.> del_timer_sync(&vif->credit_timeout); > xen_netbk_deschedule_xenvif(vif); > xen_netbk_remove_xenvif(vif); > @@ -308,12 +328,13 @@ struct xenvif *xenvif_alloc(struct device *parent, domid_t domid, > } > > int xenvif_connect(struct xenvif *vif, unsigned long tx_ring_ref, > - unsigned long rx_ring_ref, unsigned int evtchn) > + unsigned long rx_ring_ref, unsigned int tx_evtchn, > + unsigned int rx_evtchn) > { > int err = -ENOMEM; > > /* Already connected through? */ > - if (vif->irq) > + if (vif->tx_irq) > return 0; > > __module_get(THIS_MODULE); > @@ -322,13 +343,38 @@ int xenvif_connect(struct xenvif *vif, unsigned long tx_ring_ref, > if (err < 0) > goto err; > > - err = bind_interdomain_evtchn_to_irqhandler( > - vif->domid, evtchn, xenvif_interrupt, 0, > - vif->dev->name, vif); > - if (err < 0) > - goto err_unmap; > - vif->irq = err; > - disable_irq(vif->irq); > + if (tx_evtchn == rx_evtchn) { > + /* feature-split-event-channels == 0 */ > + err = bind_interdomain_evtchn_to_irqhandler( > + vif->domid, tx_evtchn, xenvif_interrupt, 0, > + vif->dev->name, vif); > + if (err < 0) > + goto err_unmap; > + vif->tx_irq = vif->rx_irq = err; > + disable_irq(vif->tx_irq); > + disable_irq(vif->rx_irq);Same as above.> + } else { > + /* feature-split-event-channels == 1 */ > + snprintf(vif->tx_irq_name, sizeof(vif->tx_irq_name), > + "%s-tx", vif->dev->name); > + err = bind_interdomain_evtchn_to_irqhandler( > + vif->domid, tx_evtchn, xenvif_tx_interrupt, 0, > + vif->tx_irq_name, vif); > + if (err < 0) > + goto err_unmap; > + vif->tx_irq = err; > + disable_irq(vif->tx_irq); > + > + snprintf(vif->rx_irq_name, sizeof(vif->rx_irq_name), > + "%s-rx", vif->dev->name); > + err = bind_interdomain_evtchn_to_irqhandler( > + vif->domid, rx_evtchn, xenvif_rx_interrupt, 0, > + vif->rx_irq_name, vif); > + if (err < 0) > + goto err_tx_unbind; > + vif->rx_irq = err; > + disable_irq(vif->rx_irq); > + } > > xenvif_get(vif); > > @@ -342,6 +388,9 @@ int xenvif_connect(struct xenvif *vif, unsigned long tx_ring_ref, > rtnl_unlock(); > > return 0; > +err_tx_unbind: > + unbind_from_irqhandler(vif->tx_irq, vif); > + vif->tx_irq = 0; > err_unmap: > xen_netbk_unmap_frontend_rings(vif); > err: > @@ -375,8 +424,13 @@ void xenvif_disconnect(struct xenvif *vif) > atomic_dec(&vif->refcnt); > wait_event(vif->waiting_to_free, atomic_read(&vif->refcnt) == 0); > > - if (vif->irq) { > - unbind_from_irqhandler(vif->irq, vif); > + if (vif->tx_irq) { > + if (vif->tx_irq == vif->rx_irq) > + unbind_from_irqhandler(vif->tx_irq, vif); > + else { > + unbind_from_irqhandler(vif->tx_irq, vif); > + unbind_from_irqhandler(vif->rx_irq, vif); > + } > /* vif->irq is valid, we had a module_get in > * xenvif_connect. > */ > diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c > index 2d9477f..ccfbb74 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c > +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c > @@ -47,6 +47,13 @@ > #include <asm/xen/hypercall.h> > #include <asm/xen/page.h> > > +/* Provide an option to disable split event channels at load time as > + * event channels are limited resource. Split event channels are > + * enabled by default. > + */ > +unsigned int feature_split_event_channels = 1; > +module_param(feature_split_event_channels, uint, 0644); > + > /* > * This is the maximum slots a skb can have. If a guest sends a skb > * which exceeds this limit it is considered malicious. > @@ -662,7 +669,7 @@ static void xen_netbk_rx_action(struct xen_netbk *netbk) > { > struct xenvif *vif = NULL, *tmp; > s8 status; > - u16 irq, flags; > + u16 flags; > struct xen_netif_rx_response *resp; > struct sk_buff_head rxq; > struct sk_buff *skb; > @@ -771,7 +778,6 @@ static void xen_netbk_rx_action(struct xen_netbk *netbk) > sco->meta_slots_used); > > RING_PUSH_RESPONSES_AND_CHECK_NOTIFY(&vif->rx, ret); > - irq = vif->irq; > if (ret && list_empty(&vif->notify_list)) > list_add_tail(&vif->notify_list, ¬ify); > > @@ -783,7 +789,7 @@ static void xen_netbk_rx_action(struct xen_netbk *netbk) > } > > list_for_each_entry_safe(vif, tmp, ¬ify, notify_list) { > - notify_remote_via_irq(vif->irq); > + notify_remote_via_irq(vif->rx_irq); > list_del_init(&vif->notify_list); > } > > @@ -1762,7 +1768,7 @@ static void make_tx_response(struct xenvif *vif, > vif->tx.rsp_prod_pvt = ++i; > RING_PUSH_RESPONSES_AND_CHECK_NOTIFY(&vif->tx, notify); > if (notify) > - notify_remote_via_irq(vif->irq); > + notify_remote_via_irq(vif->tx_irq); > } > > static struct xen_netif_rx_response *make_rx_response(struct xenvif *vif, > diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c b/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c > index d230c14..461efc6 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c > +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c > @@ -114,6 +114,15 @@ static int netback_probe(struct xenbus_device *dev, > goto abort_transaction; > } > > + /* Split event channels support */ > + err = xenbus_printf(xbt, dev->nodename, > + "feature-split-event-channels", > + "%u", feature_split_event_channels); > + if (err) { > + message = "writing feature-split-event-channels"; > + goto abort_transaction; > + } > + > err = xenbus_transaction_end(xbt, 0); > } while (err == -EAGAIN); > > @@ -393,21 +402,36 @@ static int connect_rings(struct backend_info *be) > struct xenvif *vif = be->vif; > struct xenbus_device *dev = be->dev; > unsigned long tx_ring_ref, rx_ring_ref; > - unsigned int evtchn, rx_copy; > + unsigned int tx_evtchn, rx_evtchn, rx_copy; > int err; > int val; > > err = xenbus_gather(XBT_NIL, dev->otherend, > "tx-ring-ref", "%lu", &tx_ring_ref, > - "rx-ring-ref", "%lu", &rx_ring_ref, > - "event-channel", "%u", &evtchn, NULL); > + "rx-ring-ref", "%lu", &rx_ring_ref, NULL); > if (err) { > xenbus_dev_fatal(dev, err, > - "reading %s/ring-ref and event-channel", > + "reading %s/ring-ref", > dev->otherend); > return err; > } > > + /* Try split event channels first, then single event channel. */ > + err = xenbus_gather(XBT_NIL, dev->otherend, > + "event-channel-tx", "%u", &tx_evtchn, > + "event-channel-rx", "%u", &rx_evtchn, NULL); > + if (err) { > + err = xenbus_gather(XBT_NIL, dev->otherend, > + "event-channel", "%u", &tx_evtchn, NULL); > + if (err) { > + xenbus_dev_fatal(dev, err, > + "reading %s/event-channel(-tx/rx)", > + dev->otherend);This err really comes from reading original implementation(one event channel), right? So it is better to not use (-tx/rx) here? Or using two xenbus_dev_fatal to print log: one for reading tx/rx failure, the other for one event channel failure. Thanks Annie
Wei Liu
2013-May-22 15:50 UTC
Re: [PATCH net-next V2 1/2] xen-netback: split event channels support for Xen backend driver
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 11:40:41AM -0400, annie li wrote:> > On 2013-5-21 14:35, Wei Liu wrote: > >[....] > >+ > > static int xenvif_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev) > > { > > struct xenvif *vif = netdev_priv(dev); > >@@ -125,13 +143,15 @@ static struct net_device_stats *xenvif_get_stats(struct net_device *dev) > > static void xenvif_up(struct xenvif *vif) > > { > > xen_netbk_add_xenvif(vif); > >- enable_irq(vif->irq); > >+ enable_irq(vif->tx_irq); > >+ enable_irq(vif->rx_irq); > > enable_irq are called twice in one event channel situation. How > about adding if condition here to differ one event channel and split > event channel? >Sure, if this makes code better comprehensible.> >+ /* Try split event channels first, then single event channel. */ > >+ err = xenbus_gather(XBT_NIL, dev->otherend, > >+ "event-channel-tx", "%u", &tx_evtchn, > >+ "event-channel-rx", "%u", &rx_evtchn, NULL); > >+ if (err) { > >+ err = xenbus_gather(XBT_NIL, dev->otherend, > >+ "event-channel", "%u", &tx_evtchn, NULL); > >+ if (err) { > >+ xenbus_dev_fatal(dev, err, > >+ "reading %s/event-channel(-tx/rx)", > >+ dev->otherend); > > This err really comes from reading original implementation(one event > channel), right? So it is better to not use (-tx/rx) here? > Or using two xenbus_dev_fatal to print log: one for reading tx/rx > failure, the other for one event channel failure. >The failure of reading split event channels doesn''t imply a fatal error. Here the fatal error is trying to read both split event channels and single event channel and fail. If people really want to debug this problem, they should look at xenstore entries instead of relying on this log message. Wei.> Thanks > Annie