Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-Feb-25 16:33 UTC
[PATCH] libxl: Made it possible to use ''timer=''delay_for_missed_ticks''
The assertion only allows values of 1 (no_delay_for_missed_ticks) up to 3 (one_missed_tick_pending). It should be possible to use the value of 1 (delay_for_missed_ticks) for the timer configuration option. Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> --- tools/libxl/libxl_dom.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl_dom.c b/tools/libxl/libxl_dom.c index e1cd9a4..de555ee 100644 --- a/tools/libxl/libxl_dom.c +++ b/tools/libxl/libxl_dom.c @@ -417,7 +417,7 @@ out: static unsigned long timer_mode(const libxl_domain_build_info *info) { const libxl_timer_mode mode = info->u.hvm.timer_mode; - assert(mode != LIBXL_TIMER_MODE_DELAY_FOR_MISSED_TICKS && + assert(mode >= LIBXL_TIMER_MODE_DELAY_FOR_MISSED_TICKS && mode <= LIBXL_TIMER_MODE_ONE_MISSED_TICK_PENDING); return ((unsigned long)mode); } -- 1.8.0.2
Ian Campbell
2013-Feb-25 16:43 UTC
Re: [PATCH] libxl: Made it possible to use ''timer=''delay_for_missed_ticks''
On Mon, 2013-02-25 at 16:33 +0000, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:> The assertion only allows values of 1 (no_delay_for_missed_ticks) > up to 3 (one_missed_tick_pending). It should be possible to > use the value of 1 (delay_for_missed_ticks) for the timer configuration > option.Doh! That was very likely a brainfart by me...> Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.cambell@citrix.com>> --- > tools/libxl/libxl_dom.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl_dom.c b/tools/libxl/libxl_dom.c > index e1cd9a4..de555ee 100644 > --- a/tools/libxl/libxl_dom.c > +++ b/tools/libxl/libxl_dom.c > @@ -417,7 +417,7 @@ out: > static unsigned long timer_mode(const libxl_domain_build_info *info) > { > const libxl_timer_mode mode = info->u.hvm.timer_mode; > - assert(mode != LIBXL_TIMER_MODE_DELAY_FOR_MISSED_TICKS && > + assert(mode >= LIBXL_TIMER_MODE_DELAY_FOR_MISSED_TICKS && > mode <= LIBXL_TIMER_MODE_ONE_MISSED_TICK_PENDING); > return ((unsigned long)mode); > }
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-Feb-25 17:00 UTC
Re: [PATCH] libxl: Made it possible to use ''timer=''delay_for_missed_ticks''
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 04:43:10PM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:> On Mon, 2013-02-25 at 16:33 +0000, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > The assertion only allows values of 1 (no_delay_for_missed_ticks) > > up to 3 (one_missed_tick_pending). It should be possible to > > use the value of 1 (delay_for_missed_ticks) for the timer configuration^- 0> > option. > > Doh! That was very likely a brainfart by me...And by me in the git commit description :-(> > > Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> > > Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.cambell@citrix.com>From 4f7bd24184f98b4cf53cd8a24b89829c17ca3d1d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 11:30:18 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] libxl: Made it possible to use ''timer=''delay_for_missed_ticks'' The assertion only allows values of 1 (no_delay_for_missed_ticks) up to 3 (one_missed_tick_pending). It should be possible to use the value of 0 (delay_for_missed_ticks) for the timer configuration option. Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.cambell@citrix.com> Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> --- tools/libxl/libxl_dom.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl_dom.c b/tools/libxl/libxl_dom.c index e1cd9a4..de555ee 100644 --- a/tools/libxl/libxl_dom.c +++ b/tools/libxl/libxl_dom.c @@ -417,7 +417,7 @@ out: static unsigned long timer_mode(const libxl_domain_build_info *info) { const libxl_timer_mode mode = info->u.hvm.timer_mode; - assert(mode != LIBXL_TIMER_MODE_DELAY_FOR_MISSED_TICKS && + assert(mode >= LIBXL_TIMER_MODE_DELAY_FOR_MISSED_TICKS && mode <= LIBXL_TIMER_MODE_ONE_MISSED_TICK_PENDING); return ((unsigned long)mode); } -- 1.8.0.2
Ian Jackson
2013-Feb-26 16:16 UTC
Re: [PATCH] libxl: Made it possible to use ''timer=''delay_for_missed_ticks''
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxl: Made it possible to use ''timer=''delay_for_missed_ticks''"):> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 04:43:10PM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote: > > Doh! That was very likely a brainfart by me... > > And by me in the git commit description :-(Heh.> From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> > Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 11:30:18 -0500 > Subject: [PATCH] libxl: Made it possible to use > ''timer=''delay_for_missed_ticks'' > > The assertion only allows values of 1 (no_delay_for_missed_ticks) > up to 3 (one_missed_tick_pending). It should be possible to > use the value of 0 (delay_for_missed_ticks) for the timer configuration > option. > > Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.cambell@citrix.com> > Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>Applied, thanks. Ian.