Hi All, Just tried the latest staging/xen-unstable (on debian squeeze dom0) but xl seems to segfaults (at least on domain creation): Previous pull was working fine and was about 3 or 4 days ago. Feb 18 11:16:34 serveerstertje kernel: [ 108.202658] xl[6783]: segfault at 100000000 ip 00007f065126ff52 sp 00007fffdd05b5e0 error 4 in libxenlight.so.2.0.0[7f065123d000+59000] Feb 18 11:16:34 serveerstertje kernel: [ 108.677224] xl[6788]: segfault at 100000000 ip 00007f1fa4f6cf32 sp 00007fffa26e90d8 error 4 in libc-2.11.3.so[7f1fa4ef1000+159000] Feb 18 11:16:34 serveerstertje kernel: [ 108.713586] xl[6796]: segfault at 100000000 ip 00007f15429eaf52 sp 00007fffbdd89640 error 4 in libxenlight.so.2.0.0[7f15429b8000+59000] Feb 18 11:16:35 serveerstertje kernel: [ 109.045944] xl[6801]: segfault at 61 ip 00007f4961f2a2d3 sp 00007fff76133320 error 4 in libxenlight.so.2.0.0[7f4961efa000+59000] Feb 18 11:16:35 serveerstertje kernel: [ 109.096701] xl[6809]: segfault at 100000000 ip 00007f26198ebf52 sp 00007fff6eca8df0 error 4 in libxenlight.so.2.0.0[7f26198b9000+59000] Feb 18 11:16:35 serveerstertje kernel: [ 109.421280] xl[6814]: segfault at 61 ip 00007f77919112d3 sp 00007fff6e506e80 error 4 in libxenlight.so.2.0.0[7f77918e1000+59000] Feb 18 11:16:35 serveerstertje kernel: [ 109.460799] xl[6822]: segfault at 100000000 ip 00007fa33638cf52 sp 00007fff91540ce0 error 4 in libxenlight.so.2.0.0[7fa33635a000+59000] Feb 18 11:16:35 serveerstertje kernel: [ 109.787701] xl[6827]: segfault at 61 ip 00007fc844cd92d3 sp 00007fff9cd3a8f0 error 4 in libxenlight.so.2.0.0[7fc844ca9000+59000] Feb 18 11:16:35 serveerstertje kernel: [ 109.825382] xl[6835]: segfault at 100000000 ip 00007f834c0dcf52 sp 00007fff131d7590 error 4 in libxenlight.so.2.0.0[7f834c0aa000+59000] Feb 18 11:16:36 serveerstertje kernel: [ 110.153905] xl[6840]: segfault at 61 ip 00007fe964e5b2d3 sp 00007fff7920cf30 error 4 in libxenlight.so.2.0.0[7fe964e2b000+59000] -- Sander
On Mon, 2013-02-18 at 10:21 +0000, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:> Hi All, > > Just tried the latest staging/xen-unstable (on debian squeeze dom0) but xl seems to segfaults (at least on domain creation): > Previous pull was working fine and was about 3 or 4 days ago.Do you happen to know the exact revisions? Please can you try running xl under gdb and get a backtrace.> Feb 18 11:16:34 serveerstertje kernel: [ 108.202658] xl[6783]: segfault at 100000000 ip 00007f065126ff52 sp 00007fffdd05b5e0 error 4 in libxenlight.so.2.0.0[7f065123d000+59000] > Feb 18 11:16:34 serveerstertje kernel: [ 108.677224] xl[6788]: segfault at 100000000 ip 00007f1fa4f6cf32 sp 00007fffa26e90d8 error 4 in libc-2.11.3.so[7f1fa4ef1000+159000] > Feb 18 11:16:34 serveerstertje kernel: [ 108.713586] xl[6796]: segfault at 100000000 ip 00007f15429eaf52 sp 00007fffbdd89640 error 4 in libxenlight.so.2.0.0[7f15429b8000+59000] > Feb 18 11:16:35 serveerstertje kernel: [ 109.045944] xl[6801]: segfault at 61 ip 00007f4961f2a2d3 sp 00007fff76133320 error 4 in libxenlight.so.2.0.0[7f4961efa000+59000] > Feb 18 11:16:35 serveerstertje kernel: [ 109.096701] xl[6809]: segfault at 100000000 ip 00007f26198ebf52 sp 00007fff6eca8df0 error 4 in libxenlight.so.2.0.0[7f26198b9000+59000] > Feb 18 11:16:35 serveerstertje kernel: [ 109.421280] xl[6814]: segfault at 61 ip 00007f77919112d3 sp 00007fff6e506e80 error 4 in libxenlight.so.2.0.0[7f77918e1000+59000] > Feb 18 11:16:35 serveerstertje kernel: [ 109.460799] xl[6822]: segfault at 100000000 ip 00007fa33638cf52 sp 00007fff91540ce0 error 4 in libxenlight.so.2.0.0[7fa33635a000+59000] > Feb 18 11:16:35 serveerstertje kernel: [ 109.787701] xl[6827]: segfault at 61 ip 00007fc844cd92d3 sp 00007fff9cd3a8f0 error 4 in libxenlight.so.2.0.0[7fc844ca9000+59000] > Feb 18 11:16:35 serveerstertje kernel: [ 109.825382] xl[6835]: segfault at 100000000 ip 00007f834c0dcf52 sp 00007fff131d7590 error 4 in libxenlight.so.2.0.0[7f834c0aa000+59000] > Feb 18 11:16:36 serveerstertje kernel: [ 110.153905] xl[6840]: segfault at 61 ip 00007fe964e5b2d3 sp 00007fff7920cf30 error 4 in libxenlight.so.2.0.0[7fe964e2b000+59000] > > -- > > Sander > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xen.org > http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
Monday, February 18, 2013, 11:52:38 AM, you wrote:> On Mon, 2013-02-18 at 10:21 +0000, Sander Eikelenboom wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> Just tried the latest staging/xen-unstable (on debian squeeze dom0) but xl seems to segfaults (at least on domain creation): >> Previous pull was working fine and was about 3 or 4 days ago.> Do you happen to know the exact revisions?bad: 26579 (tip) good: 26532 So it has to be somewhere in between.> Please can you try running xl under gdb and get a backtrace.Will see if i have the time this afternoon, for the moment i have to have the machine up and running.>> Feb 18 11:16:34 serveerstertje kernel: [ 108.202658] xl[6783]: segfault at 100000000 ip 00007f065126ff52 sp 00007fffdd05b5e0 error 4 in libxenlight.so.2.0.0[7f065123d000+59000] >> Feb 18 11:16:34 serveerstertje kernel: [ 108.677224] xl[6788]: segfault at 100000000 ip 00007f1fa4f6cf32 sp 00007fffa26e90d8 error 4 in libc-2.11.3.so[7f1fa4ef1000+159000] >> Feb 18 11:16:34 serveerstertje kernel: [ 108.713586] xl[6796]: segfault at 100000000 ip 00007f15429eaf52 sp 00007fffbdd89640 error 4 in libxenlight.so.2.0.0[7f15429b8000+59000] >> Feb 18 11:16:35 serveerstertje kernel: [ 109.045944] xl[6801]: segfault at 61 ip 00007f4961f2a2d3 sp 00007fff76133320 error 4 in libxenlight.so.2.0.0[7f4961efa000+59000] >> Feb 18 11:16:35 serveerstertje kernel: [ 109.096701] xl[6809]: segfault at 100000000 ip 00007f26198ebf52 sp 00007fff6eca8df0 error 4 in libxenlight.so.2.0.0[7f26198b9000+59000] >> Feb 18 11:16:35 serveerstertje kernel: [ 109.421280] xl[6814]: segfault at 61 ip 00007f77919112d3 sp 00007fff6e506e80 error 4 in libxenlight.so.2.0.0[7f77918e1000+59000] >> Feb 18 11:16:35 serveerstertje kernel: [ 109.460799] xl[6822]: segfault at 100000000 ip 00007fa33638cf52 sp 00007fff91540ce0 error 4 in libxenlight.so.2.0.0[7fa33635a000+59000] >> Feb 18 11:16:35 serveerstertje kernel: [ 109.787701] xl[6827]: segfault at 61 ip 00007fc844cd92d3 sp 00007fff9cd3a8f0 error 4 in libxenlight.so.2.0.0[7fc844ca9000+59000] >> Feb 18 11:16:35 serveerstertje kernel: [ 109.825382] xl[6835]: segfault at 100000000 ip 00007f834c0dcf52 sp 00007fff131d7590 error 4 in libxenlight.so.2.0.0[7f834c0aa000+59000] >> Feb 18 11:16:36 serveerstertje kernel: [ 110.153905] xl[6840]: segfault at 61 ip 00007fe964e5b2d3 sp 00007fff7920cf30 error 4 in libxenlight.so.2.0.0[7fe964e2b000+59000] >> >> -- >> >> Sander >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Xen-devel mailing list >> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org >> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
Monday, February 18, 2013, 11:52:38 AM, you wrote:> On Mon, 2013-02-18 at 10:21 +0000, Sander Eikelenboom wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> Just tried the latest staging/xen-unstable (on debian squeeze dom0) but xl seems to segfaults (at least on domain creation): >> Previous pull was working fine and was about 3 or 4 days ago.> Do you happen to know the exact revisions?> Please can you try running xl under gdb and get a backtrace.Hmm sorry for the noise, didn''t properly cleanup stale files from the reverted "install to /usr/local/" changes. That went ok from jan 27th till now .. so it didn''t immediately rang a bell. -- Sander>> Feb 18 11:16:34 serveerstertje kernel: [ 108.202658] xl[6783]: segfault at 100000000 ip 00007f065126ff52 sp 00007fffdd05b5e0 error 4 in libxenlight.so.2.0.0[7f065123d000+59000] >> Feb 18 11:16:34 serveerstertje kernel: [ 108.677224] xl[6788]: segfault at 100000000 ip 00007f1fa4f6cf32 sp 00007fffa26e90d8 error 4 in libc-2.11.3.so[7f1fa4ef1000+159000] >> Feb 18 11:16:34 serveerstertje kernel: [ 108.713586] xl[6796]: segfault at 100000000 ip 00007f15429eaf52 sp 00007fffbdd89640 error 4 in libxenlight.so.2.0.0[7f15429b8000+59000] >> Feb 18 11:16:35 serveerstertje kernel: [ 109.045944] xl[6801]: segfault at 61 ip 00007f4961f2a2d3 sp 00007fff76133320 error 4 in libxenlight.so.2.0.0[7f4961efa000+59000] >> Feb 18 11:16:35 serveerstertje kernel: [ 109.096701] xl[6809]: segfault at 100000000 ip 00007f26198ebf52 sp 00007fff6eca8df0 error 4 in libxenlight.so.2.0.0[7f26198b9000+59000] >> Feb 18 11:16:35 serveerstertje kernel: [ 109.421280] xl[6814]: segfault at 61 ip 00007f77919112d3 sp 00007fff6e506e80 error 4 in libxenlight.so.2.0.0[7f77918e1000+59000] >> Feb 18 11:16:35 serveerstertje kernel: [ 109.460799] xl[6822]: segfault at 100000000 ip 00007fa33638cf52 sp 00007fff91540ce0 error 4 in libxenlight.so.2.0.0[7fa33635a000+59000] >> Feb 18 11:16:35 serveerstertje kernel: [ 109.787701] xl[6827]: segfault at 61 ip 00007fc844cd92d3 sp 00007fff9cd3a8f0 error 4 in libxenlight.so.2.0.0[7fc844ca9000+59000] >> Feb 18 11:16:35 serveerstertje kernel: [ 109.825382] xl[6835]: segfault at 100000000 ip 00007f834c0dcf52 sp 00007fff131d7590 error 4 in libxenlight.so.2.0.0[7f834c0aa000+59000] >> Feb 18 11:16:36 serveerstertje kernel: [ 110.153905] xl[6840]: segfault at 61 ip 00007fe964e5b2d3 sp 00007fff7920cf30 error 4 in libxenlight.so.2.0.0[7fe964e2b000+59000] >> >> -- >> >> Sander >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Xen-devel mailing list >> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org >> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
> -----Original Message----- > From: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org [mailto:xen-devel- > bounces@lists.xen.org] On Behalf Of Sander Eikelenboom > Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 5:58 PM > To: Ian Campbell > Cc: xen-devel > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] xl segfaults on latest staging/xen-unstable > > > Monday, February 18, 2013, 11:52:38 AM, you wrote: > > > On Mon, 2013-02-18 at 10:21 +0000, Sander Eikelenboom wrote: > >> Hi All, > >> > >> Just tried the latest staging/xen-unstable (on debian squeeze dom0) > but xl seems to segfaults (at least on domain creation): > >> Previous pull was working fine and was about 3 or 4 days ago. > > > Do you happen to know the exact revisions? > > > Please can you try running xl under gdb and get a backtrace. > > Hmm sorry for the noise, didn''t properly cleanup stale files from the > reverted "install to /usr/local/" changes. > That went ok from jan 27th till now .. so it didn''t immediately rang a > bell. > > -- > Sander >Yes I got hit with that recently too. BTW I noticed in the configure script that ac_default_prefix is set twice, as in: ac_default_prefix=/usr/local ... a bit later on ac_default_prefix=/usr Is that intentional or an artifact?
Ross Philipson writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] xl segfaults on latest
staging/xen-unstable"):> Yes I got hit with that recently too. BTW I noticed in the configure script
> that ac_default_prefix is set twice, as in:
>
> ac_default_prefix=/usr/local
>
> ... a bit later on
>
> ac_default_prefix=/usr
>
> Is that intentional or an artifact?
I think this is probably the result of a mistake somewhere...
Ian.