xen.org
2013-Jan-25 22:24 UTC
[xen-unstable test] 15220: regressions - trouble: broken/fail/pass
flight 15220 xen-unstable real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/15220/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-xl-multivcpu 6 leak-check/basis(6) fail REGR. vs. 15179
test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd 6 leak-check/basis(6) fail REGR. vs. 15179
test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-amd 6 leak-check/basis(6) fail REGR. vs. 15179
test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-amd 6 leak-check/basis(6) fail REGR. vs. 15179
test-amd64-amd64-xl 6 leak-check/basis(6) fail REGR. vs. 15179
test-amd64-i386-xend-winxpsp3 6 leak-check/basis(6) fail REGR. vs. 15179
test-amd64-i386-win 6 leak-check/basis(6) fail REGR. vs. 15179
test-amd64-amd64-pv 6 leak-check/basis(6) fail REGR. vs. 15179
test-amd64-i386-qemut-win-vcpus1 6 leak-check/basis(6) fail REGR. vs. 15179
test-amd64-i386-xl-win-vcpus1 6 leak-check/basis(6) fail REGR. vs. 15179
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 6 leak-check/basis(6) fail REGR. vs. 15179
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 6 leak-check/basis(6) fail REGR. vs. 15179
test-amd64-amd64-xl-win7-amd64 6 leak-check/basis(6) fail REGR. vs. 15179
test-amd64-i386-pv 6 leak-check/basis(6) fail REGR. vs. 15179
test-amd64-i386-xl-credit2 6 leak-check/basis(6) fail REGR. vs. 15179
test-amd64-i386-xl 6 leak-check/basis(6) fail REGR. vs. 15179
test-amd64-amd64-win 6 leak-check/basis(6) fail REGR. vs. 15179
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-winxpsp3 6 leak-check/basis(6) fail REGR. vs. 15179
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 6 leak-check/basis(6) fail REGR. vs. 15179
test-amd64-i386-xl-win7-amd64 6 leak-check/basis(6) fail REGR. vs. 15179
test-amd64-amd64-xl-winxpsp3 6 leak-check/basis(6) fail REGR. vs. 15179
test-amd64-i386-win-vcpus1 6 leak-check/basis(6) fail REGR. vs. 15179
test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel 6 leak-check/basis(6) fail REGR. vs. 15179
test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-intel 6 leak-check/basis(6) fail REGR. vs. 15179
test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-intel 6 leak-check/basis(6) fail REGR. vs. 15179
test-amd64-amd64-qemut-win 6 leak-check/basis(6) fail REGR. vs. 15179
test-amd64-amd64-pair 10 leak-check/basis/dst_host(10) fail REGR. vs. 15179
test-amd64-amd64-pair 9 leak-check/basis/src_host(9) fail REGR. vs. 15179
test-amd64-i386-pair 9 leak-check/basis/src_host(9) fail REGR. vs. 15179
test-amd64-i386-pair 10 leak-check/basis/dst_host(10) fail REGR. vs. 15179
test-amd64-i386-xend-qemut-winxpsp3 6 leak-check/basis(6) fail REGR. vs. 15179
test-amd64-i386-xl-winxpsp3-vcpus1 6 leak-check/basis(6) fail REGR. vs. 15179
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-winxpsp3-vcpus1 6 leak-check/basis(6) fail REGR. vs.
15179
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win-vcpus1 6 leak-check/basis(6) fail REGR. vs. 15179
test-amd64-i386-qemut-win 6 leak-check/basis(6) fail REGR. vs. 15179
test-amd64-amd64-xl-win 6 leak-check/basis(6) fail REGR. vs. 15179
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 6 leak-check/basis(6) fail REGR. vs. 15179
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win 6 leak-check/basis(6) fail REGR. vs. 15179
Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
test-amd64-amd64-xl-pcipt-intel 6 leak-check/basis(6) fail REGR. vs. 15179
test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf 5 xen-boot fail like 15179
test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf-pin 5 xen-boot fail like 15179
version targeted for testing:
xen 27778b4099ba
baseline version:
xen 5af4f2ab06f3
------------------------------------------------------------
People who touched revisions under test:
Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@oracle.com>
Daniel De Graaf <dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov>
Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
Dongxiao Xu <dongxiao.xu@intel.com>
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Jim Fehlig <jfehlig@suse.com>
Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@intel.com>
Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
Matt Wilson <msw@amazon.com>
Razvan Cojocaru <rzvncj@gmail.com>
Roger Pau Monn? <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>
Tomasz Wroblewski <tomasz.wroblewski@citrix.com>
------------------------------------------------------------
jobs:
build-amd64 pass
build-i386 pass
build-amd64-oldkern pass
build-i386-oldkern pass
build-amd64-pvops pass
build-i386-pvops pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl broken
test-amd64-i386-xl broken
test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd broken
test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-amd broken
test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-amd broken
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 broken
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 broken
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 broken
test-amd64-amd64-xl-win7-amd64 broken
test-amd64-i386-xl-win7-amd64 broken
test-amd64-i386-xl-credit2 broken
test-amd64-amd64-xl-pcipt-intel broken
test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel broken
test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-intel broken
test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-intel broken
test-amd64-i386-xl-multivcpu broken
test-amd64-amd64-pair broken
test-amd64-i386-pair broken
test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf-pin fail
test-amd64-amd64-pv broken
test-amd64-i386-pv broken
test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf fail
test-amd64-i386-win-vcpus1 broken
test-amd64-i386-qemut-win-vcpus1 broken
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win-vcpus1 broken
test-amd64-i386-xl-win-vcpus1 broken
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-winxpsp3-vcpus1 broken
test-amd64-i386-xl-winxpsp3-vcpus1 broken
test-amd64-amd64-win broken
test-amd64-i386-win broken
test-amd64-amd64-qemut-win broken
test-amd64-i386-qemut-win broken
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win broken
test-amd64-amd64-xl-win broken
test-amd64-i386-xend-qemut-winxpsp3 broken
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-winxpsp3 broken
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 broken
test-amd64-i386-xend-winxpsp3 broken
test-amd64-amd64-xl-winxpsp3 broken
------------------------------------------------------------
sg-report-flight on woking.cam.xci-test.com
logs: /home/xc_osstest/logs
images: /home/xc_osstest/images
Logs, config files, etc. are available at
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs
Test harness code can be found at
http://xenbits.xensource.com/gitweb?p=osstest.git;a=summary
Not pushing.
(No revision log; it would be 957 lines long.)
Ian Campbell
2013-Jan-28 10:14 UTC
Re: [xen-unstable test] 15220: regressions - trouble: broken/fail/pass
On Fri, 2013-01-25 at 22:24 +0000, xen.org wrote:> flight 15220 xen-unstable real [real] > http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/15220/ > > Regressions :-( > > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, > including tests which could not be run: > test-amd64-i386-xl-multivcpu 6 leak-check/basis(6) fail REGR. vs. 15179Picking one at random http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/15220/test-amd64-amd64-xl/6.ts-leak-check.log shows: 2013-01-25 19:33:08 Z executing ssh ... root@10.80.250.28 xl list xl: error while loading shared libraries: libxlutil.so.1.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Looking at http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/15220/build-amd64/4.ts-xen-build.log I see: /home/osstest/build.15220.build-amd64/xen-unstable/tools/libxl/../../tools/cross-install -m0755 -p libxlutil.so.1.0.1 /home/osstest/build.15220.build-amd64/xen-unstable/dist/install/usr/local/lib ln -sf libxlutil.so.1.0.1 /home/osstest/build.15220.build-amd64/xen-unstable/dist/install/usr/local/lib/libxlutil.so.1.0 ln -sf libxlutil.so.1.0 /home/osstest/build.15220.build-amd64/xen-unstable/dist/install/usr/local/lib/libxlutil.so and in dist.tar.gz I see: -rw-r--r-- osstest/osstest 237434 2013-01-25 18:34 usr/local/lib/libxlutil.a lrwxrwxrwx osstest/osstest 0 2013-01-25 18:34 usr/local/lib/libxlutil.so.1.0 -> libxlutil.so.1.0.1 lrwxrwxrwx osstest/osstest 0 2013-01-25 18:34 usr/local/lib/libxlutil.so -> libxlutil.so.1.0 -rwxr-xr-x osstest/osstest 151374 2013-01-25 18:34 usr/local/lib/libxlutil.so.1.0.1 So it seems like things are where they should be. I can also see ldconfig being invoked a few times in the build log, although I don''t know if this is a) necessary or b) happening when it needs to. Ian.
Jan Beulich
2013-Jan-28 10:31 UTC
Re: [xen-unstable test] 15220: regressions - trouble: broken/fail/pass
>>> On 28.01.13 at 11:14, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com> wrote: > Picking one at random > http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/15220/test-amd64-amd64-xl/6.ts- > leak-check.log shows: > > 2013-01-25 19:33:08 Z executing ssh ... root@10.80.250.28 xl list > xl: error while loading shared libraries: libxlutil.so.1.0: cannot open > shared object file: No such file or directory > > Looking at > http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/15220/build-amd64/4.ts-xen-bui > ld.log I see: > > /home/osstest/build.15220.build-amd64/xen-unstable/tools/libxl/../../tools/cro > ss-install -m0755 -p libxlutil.so.1.0.1 > /home/osstest/build.15220.build-amd64/xen-unstable/dist/install/usr/local/l > ib > ln -sf libxlutil.so.1.0.1 > /home/osstest/build.15220.build-amd64/xen-unstable/dist/install/usr/local/l > ib/libxlutil.so.1.0 > ln -sf libxlutil.so.1.0 > /home/osstest/build.15220.build-amd64/xen-unstable/dist/install/usr/local/l > ib/libxlutil.so > > and in dist.tar.gz I see: > -rw-r--r-- osstest/osstest 237434 2013-01-25 18:34 usr/local/lib/libxlutil.a > lrwxrwxrwx osstest/osstest 0 2013-01-25 18:34 > usr/local/lib/libxlutil.so.1.0 -> libxlutil.so.1.0.1 > lrwxrwxrwx osstest/osstest 0 2013-01-25 18:34 usr/local/lib/libxlutil.so > -> libxlutil.so.1.0 > -rwxr-xr-x osstest/osstest 151374 2013-01-25 18:34 > usr/local/lib/libxlutil.so.1.0.1 > > So it seems like things are where they should be. I can also see > ldconfig being invoked a few times in the build log, although I don''t > know if this is a) necessary or b) happening when it needs to.Plus - is ldconfig configured to look in /usr/local/lib? I recall this not having been (and perhaps still not being) the case on some of our distros... Jan
Ian Campbell
2013-Jan-28 10:49 UTC
Re: [xen-unstable test] 15220: regressions - trouble: broken/fail/pass
On Mon, 2013-01-28 at 10:31 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:> >>> On 28.01.13 at 11:14, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com> wrote: > > So it seems like things are where they should be. I can also see > > ldconfig being invoked a few times in the build log, although I don''t > > know if this is a) necessary or b) happening when it needs to. > > Plus - is ldconfig configured to look in /usr/local/lib? I recall this not > having been (and perhaps still not being) the case on some of our > distros...We wondered about that but I checked Debian (which is what the test system runs) and it does include /u/l/lib by default. Ian.