thr3ads.net - Xen devel - [PATCH 0/3] XSM PIRQ and rcu_lock

If this information is useful, please help other people find it:
Share via:

Daniel De Graaf

2013-Jan-17 18:55 UTC

[PATCH 0/3] XSM PIRQ and rcu_lock_target cleanup

These three patches finish up the XSM IS_PRIV reworking, in addition to
the patches posted by Ian and Lars fixing things for ARM. I did not
include a patch removing the rcu_lock_target_domain_by_id function
because it''s still referenced in ARM at the moment, but it looks like
those locations are being changed (or will be changed in the future).

[PATCH 1/3] hvm: wire up domctl and xsm hypercalls
 - Have tested simple operations like xl list/pause/unpause from HVM.
   Things like domain creation may need some of the PVH work that also
   applies to HVM (and domain creation in particular probably shouldn''t
   be done from HVM anyway).

[PATCH 2/3] xen/arch/x86: complete XSM hooks on irq/pirq mappings
 - This should compliment Ian''s work on MSI interrupts, although it
   doesn''t look to conflict directly

[PATCH 3/3] xen/arch/arm: add XSM hook to HVMOP_{get,set}_param

Daniel De Graaf

2013-Jan-17 18:55 UTC

head link

[PATCH 1/3] hvm: wire up domctl and xsm hypercalls

These hypercalls are usable by HVM guests.  Once connected, simple
functions of the Xen toolstack can be run from an HVM domain if that
domain is permitted access (which is currently only possible via XSM).

Signed-off-by: Daniel De Graaf <dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov>
Cc: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
Cc: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
---
 xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
index 374a740..7eece1f 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
@@ -3237,8 +3237,10 @@ static hvm_hypercall_t *const
hvm_hypercall64_table[NR_hypercalls] = {
     HYPERCALL(event_channel_op),
     HYPERCALL(sched_op),
     HYPERCALL(set_timer_op),
+    HYPERCALL(xsm_op),
     HYPERCALL(hvm_op),
     HYPERCALL(sysctl),
+    HYPERCALL(domctl),
     HYPERCALL(tmem_op)
 };
 
@@ -3254,8 +3256,10 @@ static hvm_hypercall_t *const
hvm_hypercall32_table[NR_hypercalls] = {
     HYPERCALL(event_channel_op),
     COMPAT_CALL(sched_op),
     COMPAT_CALL(set_timer_op),
+    HYPERCALL(xsm_op),
     HYPERCALL(hvm_op),
     HYPERCALL(sysctl),
+    HYPERCALL(domctl),
     HYPERCALL(tmem_op)
 };
 
-- 
1.8.0.2

Daniel De Graaf

2013-Jan-17 18:55 UTC

head link

[PATCH 2/3] xen/arch/x86: complete XSM hooks on irq/pirq mappings

Manipulation of a domain''s pirq namespace was not fully protected by
XSM
hooks because the XSM hooks for IRQs needed a physical IRQ.  Since this
may not apply to HVM domains, a complete solution needs to split the XSM
hook for this operation, using one hook for the PIRQ manipulation and
one for controlling access to the hardware IRQ.

This reworking has the advantage of providing the same MSI data to
remove_irq that is provided to add_irq, allowing the PCI device to be
determined in both functions.  It also eliminates the last callers of
rcu_lock_target_domain_by_id in x86 and common code in preparation for
this function''s removal.

Signed-off-by: Daniel De Graaf <dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov>
Cc: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
Cc: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
---
 xen/arch/x86/irq.c                  | 13 +++++++++----
 xen/arch/x86/physdev.c              | 18 +++++++++++-------
 xen/include/xsm/dummy.h             | 16 ++++++++++++++--
 xen/include/xsm/xsm.h               | 24 ++++++++++++++++++------
 xen/xsm/dummy.c                     |  2 ++
 xen/xsm/flask/hooks.c               | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------
 xen/xsm/flask/policy/access_vectors |  5 ++---
 7 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)

diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/irq.c b/xen/arch/x86/irq.c
index 095c17d..068c5a0 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/irq.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/irq.c
@@ -1874,7 +1874,7 @@ int map_domain_pirq(
         return 0;
     }
 
-    ret = xsm_map_domain_pirq(XSM_HOOK, d, irq, data);
+    ret = xsm_map_domain_irq(XSM_HOOK, d, irq, data);
     if ( ret )
     {
         dprintk(XENLOG_G_ERR, "dom%d: could not permit access to irq %d
mapping to pirq %d\n",
@@ -1978,14 +1978,19 @@ int unmap_domain_pirq(struct domain *d, int pirq)
         goto done;
     }
 
+    desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
+    msi_desc = desc->msi_desc;
+
+    ret = xsm_unmap_domain_irq(XSM_HOOK, d, irq, msi_desc);
+    if ( ret )
+        goto done;
+
     forced_unbind = pirq_guest_force_unbind(d, info);
     if ( forced_unbind )
         dprintk(XENLOG_G_WARNING, "dom%d: forcing unbind of pirq
%d\n",
                 d->domain_id, pirq);
 
-    desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
-
-    if ( (msi_desc = desc->msi_desc) != NULL )
+    if ( msi_desc != NULL )
         pci_disable_msi(msi_desc);
 
     spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, flags);
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/physdev.c b/xen/arch/x86/physdev.c
index b45e18a..d9ed5df 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/physdev.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/physdev.c
@@ -105,7 +105,11 @@ int physdev_map_pirq(domid_t domid, int type, int *index,
int *pirq_p,
         return physdev_hvm_map_pirq(d, type, index, pirq_p);
     }
 
-    ret = rcu_lock_target_domain_by_id(domid, &d);
+    d = rcu_lock_domain_by_any_id(domid);
+    if ( d == NULL )
+        return -ESRCH;
+
+    ret = xsm_map_domain_pirq(XSM_TARGET, d);
     if ( ret )
         return ret;
 
@@ -218,9 +222,13 @@ int physdev_unmap_pirq(domid_t domid, int pirq)
     struct domain *d;
     int ret;
 
-    ret = rcu_lock_target_domain_by_id(domid, &d);
+    d = rcu_lock_domain_by_any_id(domid);
+    if ( d == NULL )
+        return -ESRCH;
+
+    ret = xsm_unmap_domain_pirq(XSM_TARGET, d);
     if ( ret )
-        return ret;
+        goto free_domain;
 
     if ( is_hvm_domain(d) )
     {
@@ -232,10 +240,6 @@ int physdev_unmap_pirq(domid_t domid, int pirq)
             goto free_domain;
     }
 
-    ret = xsm_unmap_domain_pirq(XSM_TARGET, d, domain_pirq_to_irq(d, pirq));
-    if ( ret )
-        goto free_domain;
-
     spin_lock(&pcidevs_lock);
     spin_lock(&d->event_lock);
     ret = unmap_domain_pirq(d, pirq);
diff --git a/xen/include/xsm/dummy.h b/xen/include/xsm/dummy.h
index 1ca82b0..aa4c7d2 100644
--- a/xen/include/xsm/dummy.h
+++ b/xen/include/xsm/dummy.h
@@ -405,18 +405,30 @@ static XSM_INLINE char *xsm_show_irq_sid(int irq)
     return NULL;
 }
 
-static XSM_INLINE int xsm_map_domain_pirq(XSM_DEFAULT_ARG struct domain *d, int
irq, void *data)
+static XSM_INLINE int xsm_map_domain_pirq(XSM_DEFAULT_ARG struct domain *d)
+{
+    XSM_ASSERT_ACTION(XSM_TARGET);
+    return xsm_default_action(action, current->domain, d);
+}
+
+static XSM_INLINE int xsm_map_domain_irq(XSM_DEFAULT_ARG struct domain *d, int
irq, void *data)
 {
     XSM_ASSERT_ACTION(XSM_HOOK);
     return xsm_default_action(action, current->domain, d);
 }
 
-static XSM_INLINE int xsm_unmap_domain_pirq(XSM_DEFAULT_ARG struct domain *d,
int irq)
+static XSM_INLINE int xsm_unmap_domain_pirq(XSM_DEFAULT_ARG struct domain *d)
 {
     XSM_ASSERT_ACTION(XSM_TARGET);
     return xsm_default_action(action, current->domain, d);
 }
 
+static XSM_INLINE int xsm_unmap_domain_irq(XSM_DEFAULT_ARG struct domain *d,
int irq, void *data)
+{
+    XSM_ASSERT_ACTION(XSM_HOOK);
+    return xsm_default_action(action, current->domain, d);
+}
+
 static XSM_INLINE int xsm_irq_permission(XSM_DEFAULT_ARG struct domain *d, int
pirq, uint8_t allow)
 {
     XSM_ASSERT_ACTION(XSM_HOOK);
diff --git a/xen/include/xsm/xsm.h b/xen/include/xsm/xsm.h
index 8947372..c77cb92 100644
--- a/xen/include/xsm/xsm.h
+++ b/xen/include/xsm/xsm.h
@@ -100,8 +100,10 @@ struct xsm_operations {
     int (*schedop_shutdown) (struct domain *d1, struct domain *d2);
 
     char *(*show_irq_sid) (int irq);
-    int (*map_domain_pirq) (struct domain *d, int irq, void *data);
-    int (*unmap_domain_pirq) (struct domain *d, int irq);
+    int (*map_domain_pirq) (struct domain *d);
+    int (*map_domain_irq) (struct domain *d, int irq, void *data);
+    int (*unmap_domain_pirq) (struct domain *d);
+    int (*unmap_domain_irq) (struct domain *d, int irq, void *data);
     int (*irq_permission) (struct domain *d, int pirq, uint8_t allow);
     int (*iomem_permission) (struct domain *d, uint64_t s, uint64_t e, uint8_t
allow);
     int (*iomem_mapping) (struct domain *d, uint64_t s, uint64_t e, uint8_t
allow);
@@ -365,14 +367,24 @@ static inline char *xsm_show_irq_sid (int irq)
     return xsm_ops->show_irq_sid(irq);
 }
 
-static inline int xsm_map_domain_pirq (xsm_default_t def, struct domain *d, int
irq, void *data)
+static inline int xsm_map_domain_pirq (xsm_default_t def, struct domain *d)
 {
-    return xsm_ops->map_domain_pirq(d, irq, data);
+    return xsm_ops->map_domain_pirq(d);
 }
 
-static inline int xsm_unmap_domain_pirq (xsm_default_t def, struct domain *d,
int irq)
+static inline int xsm_map_domain_irq (xsm_default_t def, struct domain *d, int
irq, void *data)
 {
-    return xsm_ops->unmap_domain_pirq(d, irq);
+    return xsm_ops->map_domain_irq(d, irq, data);
+}
+
+static inline int xsm_unmap_domain_pirq (xsm_default_t def, struct domain *d)
+{
+    return xsm_ops->unmap_domain_pirq(d);
+}
+
+static inline int xsm_unmap_domain_irq (xsm_default_t def, struct domain *d,
int irq, void *data)
+{
+    return xsm_ops->unmap_domain_irq(d, irq, data);
 }
 
 static inline int xsm_irq_permission (xsm_default_t def, struct domain *d, int
pirq, uint8_t allow)
diff --git a/xen/xsm/dummy.c b/xen/xsm/dummy.c
index 529a724..5a9371f 100644
--- a/xen/xsm/dummy.c
+++ b/xen/xsm/dummy.c
@@ -76,7 +76,9 @@ void xsm_fixup_ops (struct xsm_operations *ops)
 
     set_to_dummy_if_null(ops, show_irq_sid);
     set_to_dummy_if_null(ops, map_domain_pirq);
+    set_to_dummy_if_null(ops, map_domain_irq);
     set_to_dummy_if_null(ops, unmap_domain_pirq);
+    set_to_dummy_if_null(ops, unmap_domain_irq);
     set_to_dummy_if_null(ops, irq_permission);
     set_to_dummy_if_null(ops, iomem_permission);
     set_to_dummy_if_null(ops, iomem_mapping);
diff --git a/xen/xsm/flask/hooks.c b/xen/xsm/flask/hooks.c
index ba67502..ba136ba 100644
--- a/xen/xsm/flask/hooks.c
+++ b/xen/xsm/flask/hooks.c
@@ -818,18 +818,18 @@ static char *flask_show_irq_sid (int irq)
     return ctx;
 }
 
-static int flask_map_domain_pirq (struct domain *d, int irq, void *data)
+static int flask_map_domain_pirq (struct domain *d)
+{
+    return current_has_perm(d, SECCLASS_RESOURCE, RESOURCE__ADD);
+}
+
+static int flask_map_domain_irq (struct domain *d, int irq, void *data)
 {
     u32 sid, dsid;
     int rc = -EPERM;
     struct msi_info *msi = data;
     struct avc_audit_data ad;
 
-    rc = current_has_perm(d, SECCLASS_RESOURCE, RESOURCE__ADD);
-
-    if ( rc )
-        return rc;
-
     if ( irq >= nr_static_irqs && msi ) {
         u32 machine_bdf = (msi->seg << 16) | (msi->bus << 8)
| msi->devfn;
         AVC_AUDIT_DATA_INIT(&ad, DEV);
@@ -851,22 +851,25 @@ static int flask_map_domain_pirq (struct domain *d, int
irq, void *data)
     return rc;
 }
 
-static int flask_unmap_domain_pirq (struct domain *d, int irq)
+static int flask_unmap_domain_pirq (struct domain *d)
+{
+    return current_has_perm(d, SECCLASS_RESOURCE, RESOURCE__REMOVE);
+}
+
+static int flask_unmap_domain_irq (struct domain *d, int irq, void *data)
 {
     u32 sid;
     int rc = -EPERM;
+    struct msi_info *msi = data;
     struct avc_audit_data ad;
 
-    rc = current_has_perm(d, SECCLASS_RESOURCE, RESOURCE__REMOVE);
-    if ( rc )
-        return rc;
-
-    if ( irq < nr_static_irqs ) {
-        rc = get_irq_sid(irq, &sid, &ad);
+    if ( irq >= nr_static_irqs && msi ) {
+        u32 machine_bdf = (msi->seg << 16) | (msi->bus << 8)
| msi->devfn;
+        AVC_AUDIT_DATA_INIT(&ad, DEV);
+        ad.device = machine_bdf;
+        rc = security_device_sid(machine_bdf, &sid);
     } else {
-        /* It is currently not possible to check the specific MSI IRQ being
-         * removed, since we do not have the msi_info like map_domain_pirq */
-        return 0;
+        rc = get_irq_sid(irq, &sid, &ad);
     }
     if ( rc )
         return rc;
@@ -1481,7 +1484,9 @@ static struct xsm_operations flask_ops = {
     .show_irq_sid = flask_show_irq_sid,
 
     .map_domain_pirq = flask_map_domain_pirq,
+    .map_domain_irq = flask_map_domain_irq,
     .unmap_domain_pirq = flask_unmap_domain_pirq,
+    .unmap_domain_irq = flask_unmap_domain_irq,
     .irq_permission = flask_irq_permission,
     .iomem_permission = flask_iomem_permission,
     .iomem_mapping = flask_iomem_mapping,
diff --git a/xen/xsm/flask/policy/access_vectors
b/xen/xsm/flask/policy/access_vectors
index 2fdaede..36cbacf 100644
--- a/xen/xsm/flask/policy/access_vectors
+++ b/xen/xsm/flask/policy/access_vectors
@@ -368,12 +368,11 @@ class resource
 #  target = resource''s security label
 # also checked when using some core Xen devices (target xen_t)
     use
-# PHYSDEVOP_map_pirq and ioapic writes for dom0
+# PHYSDEVOP_map_pirq and ioapic writes for dom0, when acting on real IRQs
 #  For GSI interrupts, the IRQ''s label is indexed by the IRQ number
 #  For MSI interrupts, the label of the PCI device is used
     add_irq
-# PHYSDEVOP_unmap_pirq:
-#  This is currently only checked for GSI interrupts
+# PHYSDEVOP_unmap_pirq (same as map, and only for real IRQs)
     remove_irq
 # XEN_DOMCTL_ioport_permission, XEN_DOMCTL_ioport_mapping
     add_ioport
-- 
1.8.0.2

Daniel De Graaf

2013-Jan-17 18:55 UTC

head link

[PATCH 3/3] xen/arch/arm: add XSM hook to HVMOP_{get, set}_param

This hook is not x86-specific; move it out of CONFIG_X86.

Signed-off-by: Daniel De Graaf <dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov>
Cc: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@citrix.com>
Cc: Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>
---
 xen/arch/arm/hvm.c      | 11 ++++++++---
 xen/include/xsm/dummy.h | 10 +++++-----
 xen/include/xsm/xsm.h   | 13 +++++++------
 xen/xsm/dummy.c         |  2 +-
 xen/xsm/flask/hooks.c   | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
 5 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)

diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/hvm.c b/xen/arch/arm/hvm.c
index 40f519e..63ac793 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/hvm.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/hvm.c
@@ -30,9 +30,13 @@ long do_hvm_op(unsigned long op, XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(void)
arg)
         if ( a.index >= HVM_NR_PARAMS )
             return -EINVAL;
 
-        rc = rcu_lock_target_domain_by_id(a.domid, &d);
-        if ( rc != 0 )
-            return rc;
+        d = rcu_lock_domain_by_any_id(a.domid);
+        if ( d == NULL )
+            return -ESRCH;
+
+        rc = xsm_hvm_param(XSM_TARGET, d, op);
+        if ( rc )
+            goto param_fail;
 
         if ( op == HVMOP_set_param )
         {
@@ -44,6 +48,7 @@ long do_hvm_op(unsigned long op, XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(void)
arg)
             rc = copy_to_guest(arg, &a, 1) ? -EFAULT : 0;
         }
 
+    param_fail:
         rcu_unlock_domain(d);
         break;
     }
diff --git a/xen/include/xsm/dummy.h b/xen/include/xsm/dummy.h
index aa4c7d2..8c746a4 100644
--- a/xen/include/xsm/dummy.h
+++ b/xen/include/xsm/dummy.h
@@ -455,16 +455,16 @@ static XSM_INLINE int
xsm_pci_config_permission(XSM_DEFAULT_ARG struct domain *d
     return xsm_default_action(action, current->domain, d);
 }
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_X86
-static XSM_INLINE int xsm_shadow_control(XSM_DEFAULT_ARG struct domain *d,
uint32_t op)
+static XSM_INLINE int xsm_hvm_param(XSM_DEFAULT_ARG struct domain *d, unsigned
long op)
 {
-    XSM_ASSERT_ACTION(XSM_HOOK);
+    XSM_ASSERT_ACTION(XSM_TARGET);
     return xsm_default_action(action, current->domain, d);
 }
 
-static XSM_INLINE int xsm_hvm_param(XSM_DEFAULT_ARG struct domain *d, unsigned
long op)
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86
+static XSM_INLINE int xsm_shadow_control(XSM_DEFAULT_ARG struct domain *d,
uint32_t op)
 {
-    XSM_ASSERT_ACTION(XSM_TARGET);
+    XSM_ASSERT_ACTION(XSM_HOOK);
     return xsm_default_action(action, current->domain, d);
 }
 
diff --git a/xen/include/xsm/xsm.h b/xen/include/xsm/xsm.h
index c77cb92..c73c872 100644
--- a/xen/include/xsm/xsm.h
+++ b/xen/include/xsm/xsm.h
@@ -128,9 +128,10 @@ struct xsm_operations {
 
     long (*do_xsm_op) (XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(xsm_op_t) op);
 
+    int (*hvm_param) (struct domain *d, unsigned long op);
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86
     int (*shadow_control) (struct domain *d, uint32_t op);
-    int (*hvm_param) (struct domain *d, unsigned long op);
     int (*hvm_set_pci_intx_level) (struct domain *d);
     int (*hvm_set_isa_irq_level) (struct domain *d);
     int (*hvm_set_pci_link_route) (struct domain *d);
@@ -482,15 +483,15 @@ static inline long xsm_do_xsm_op
(XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(xsm_op_t) op)
     return xsm_ops->do_xsm_op(op);
 }
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_X86
-static inline int xsm_shadow_control (xsm_default_t def, struct domain *d,
uint32_t op)
+static inline int xsm_hvm_param (xsm_default_t def, struct domain *d, unsigned
long op)
 {
-    return xsm_ops->shadow_control(d, op);
+    return xsm_ops->hvm_param(d, op);
 }
 
-static inline int xsm_hvm_param (xsm_default_t def, struct domain *d, unsigned
long op)
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86
+static inline int xsm_shadow_control (xsm_default_t def, struct domain *d,
uint32_t op)
 {
-    return xsm_ops->hvm_param(d, op);
+    return xsm_ops->shadow_control(d, op);
 }
 
 static inline int xsm_hvm_set_pci_intx_level (xsm_default_t def, struct domain
*d)
diff --git a/xen/xsm/dummy.c b/xen/xsm/dummy.c
index 5a9371f..cae42f5 100644
--- a/xen/xsm/dummy.c
+++ b/xen/xsm/dummy.c
@@ -100,12 +100,12 @@ void xsm_fixup_ops (struct xsm_operations *ops)
     set_to_dummy_if_null(ops, page_offline);
     set_to_dummy_if_null(ops, tmem_op);
     set_to_dummy_if_null(ops, tmem_control);
+    set_to_dummy_if_null(ops, hvm_param);
 
     set_to_dummy_if_null(ops, do_xsm_op);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86
     set_to_dummy_if_null(ops, shadow_control);
-    set_to_dummy_if_null(ops, hvm_param);
     set_to_dummy_if_null(ops, hvm_set_pci_intx_level);
     set_to_dummy_if_null(ops, hvm_set_isa_irq_level);
     set_to_dummy_if_null(ops, hvm_set_pci_link_route);
diff --git a/xen/xsm/flask/hooks.c b/xen/xsm/flask/hooks.c
index ba136ba..eb1d764 100644
--- a/xen/xsm/flask/hooks.c
+++ b/xen/xsm/flask/hooks.c
@@ -1058,6 +1058,28 @@ static inline int flask_tmem_control(void)
     return domain_has_xen(current->domain, XEN__TMEM_CONTROL);
 }
 
+static int flask_hvm_param(struct domain *d, unsigned long op)
+{
+    u32 perm;
+
+    switch ( op )
+    {
+    case HVMOP_set_param:
+        perm = HVM__SETPARAM;
+        break;
+    case HVMOP_get_param:
+        perm = HVM__GETPARAM;
+        break;
+    case HVMOP_track_dirty_vram:
+        perm = HVM__TRACKDIRTYVRAM;
+        break;
+    default:
+        perm = HVM__HVMCTL;
+    }
+
+    return current_has_perm(d, SECCLASS_HVM, perm);
+}
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86
 static int flask_shadow_control(struct domain *d, uint32_t op)
 {
@@ -1138,28 +1160,6 @@ static int flask_ioport_mapping(struct domain *d,
uint32_t start, uint32_t end,
     return flask_ioport_permission(d, start, end, access);
 }
 
-static int flask_hvm_param(struct domain *d, unsigned long op)
-{
-    u32 perm;
-
-    switch ( op )
-    {
-    case HVMOP_set_param:
-        perm = HVM__SETPARAM;
-        break;
-    case HVMOP_get_param:
-        perm = HVM__GETPARAM;
-        break;
-    case HVMOP_track_dirty_vram:
-        perm = HVM__TRACKDIRTYVRAM;
-        break;
-    default:
-        perm = HVM__HVMCTL;
-    }
-
-    return current_has_perm(d, SECCLASS_HVM, perm);
-}
-
 static int flask_hvm_set_pci_intx_level(struct domain *d)
 {
     return current_has_perm(d, SECCLASS_HVM, HVM__PCILEVEL);
@@ -1503,12 +1503,12 @@ static struct xsm_operations flask_ops = {
     .page_offline = flask_page_offline,
     .tmem_op = flask_tmem_op,
     .tmem_control = flask_tmem_control,
+    .hvm_param = flask_hvm_param,
 
     .do_xsm_op = do_flask_op,
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86
     .shadow_control = flask_shadow_control,
-    .hvm_param = flask_hvm_param,
     .hvm_set_pci_intx_level = flask_hvm_set_pci_intx_level,
     .hvm_set_isa_irq_level = flask_hvm_set_isa_irq_level,
     .hvm_set_pci_link_route = flask_hvm_set_pci_link_route,
-- 
1.8.0.2

Ian Campbell

2013-Jan-18 09:19 UTC

head link

Re: [PATCH 3/3] xen/arch/arm: add XSM hook to HVMOP_{get, set}_param

On Thu, 2013-01-17 at 18:55 +0000, Daniel De Graaf
wrote:> This hook is not x86-specific; move it out of CONFIG_X86.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel De Graaf <dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov>
> Cc: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
> Cc: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@citrix.com>
> Cc: Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>
Looks good to me (other than diff choosing the most confusing possible
way to represent the movement of xsm_hvm_param in xsm.h!)

Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>

Ian Campbell

2013-Jan-18 09:23 UTC

head link

Re: [PATCH 0/3] XSM PIRQ and rcu_lock_target cleanup

On Thu, 2013-01-17 at 18:55 +0000, Daniel De Graaf
wrote:> These three patches finish up the XSM IS_PRIV reworking, in addition to
> the patches posted by Ian and Lars fixing things for ARM. I did not
> include a patch removing the rcu_lock_target_domain_by_id function
> because it''s still referenced in ARM at the moment, but it looks
like
> those locations are being changed (or will be changed in the future).
Am I right that the appropriate transformation is:
	rc = rcu_lock_target_domain_by_id(domid, &d);
becomes:
	d = rcu_lock_domain_by_any_id(a.domid);
        if ( d == NULL )
            return -ESRCH;

	rc = xsm_SOMETHING(XSM_TARGET, d, PARAMS);
	if ( rc )
	    ... unlock .. return or goto err

Ian.

Keir Fraser

2013-Jan-23 09:20 UTC

head link

Re: [PATCH 3/3] xen/arch/arm: add XSM hook to HVMOP_{get, set}_param

On 17/01/2013 18:55, "Daniel De Graaf" <dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov>
wrote:
> This hook is not x86-specific; move it out of CONFIG_X86.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel De Graaf <dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov>
> Cc: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
> Cc: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@citrix.com>
> Cc: Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>
Doesn''t apply to tip of xen-unstable. I''ve committed the other
two patches
in this series.

 -- Keir

Daniel De Graaf

2013-Jan-23 14:24 UTC

head link

[PATCH v2 3/3] xen/arch/arm: add XSM hook to HVMOP_{get, set}_param

This hook is not x86-specific; move it out of CONFIG_X86.

Signed-off-by: Daniel De Graaf <dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov>
Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
---
 xen/arch/arm/hvm.c      | 11 ++++++++---
 xen/include/xsm/dummy.h | 10 +++++-----
 xen/include/xsm/xsm.h   | 13 +++++++------
 xen/xsm/dummy.c         |  2 +-
 xen/xsm/flask/hooks.c   | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
 5 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)

diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/hvm.c b/xen/arch/arm/hvm.c
index 40f519e..63ac793 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/hvm.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/hvm.c
@@ -30,9 +30,13 @@ long do_hvm_op(unsigned long op, XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(void)
arg)
         if ( a.index >= HVM_NR_PARAMS )
             return -EINVAL;
 
-        rc = rcu_lock_target_domain_by_id(a.domid, &d);
-        if ( rc != 0 )
-            return rc;
+        d = rcu_lock_domain_by_any_id(a.domid);
+        if ( d == NULL )
+            return -ESRCH;
+
+        rc = xsm_hvm_param(XSM_TARGET, d, op);
+        if ( rc )
+            goto param_fail;
 
         if ( op == HVMOP_set_param )
         {
@@ -44,6 +48,7 @@ long do_hvm_op(unsigned long op, XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(void)
arg)
             rc = copy_to_guest(arg, &a, 1) ? -EFAULT : 0;
         }
 
+    param_fail:
         rcu_unlock_domain(d);
         break;
     }
diff --git a/xen/include/xsm/dummy.h b/xen/include/xsm/dummy.h
index 19bbe19..025936a 100644
--- a/xen/include/xsm/dummy.h
+++ b/xen/include/xsm/dummy.h
@@ -467,16 +467,16 @@ static XSM_INLINE int
xsm_remove_from_physmap(XSM_DEFAULT_ARG struct domain *d1,
     return xsm_default_action(action, d1, d2);
 }
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_X86
-static XSM_INLINE int xsm_shadow_control(XSM_DEFAULT_ARG struct domain *d,
uint32_t op)
+static XSM_INLINE int xsm_hvm_param(XSM_DEFAULT_ARG struct domain *d, unsigned
long op)
 {
-    XSM_ASSERT_ACTION(XSM_HOOK);
+    XSM_ASSERT_ACTION(XSM_TARGET);
     return xsm_default_action(action, current->domain, d);
 }
 
-static XSM_INLINE int xsm_hvm_param(XSM_DEFAULT_ARG struct domain *d, unsigned
long op)
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86
+static XSM_INLINE int xsm_shadow_control(XSM_DEFAULT_ARG struct domain *d,
uint32_t op)
 {
-    XSM_ASSERT_ACTION(XSM_TARGET);
+    XSM_ASSERT_ACTION(XSM_HOOK);
     return xsm_default_action(action, current->domain, d);
 }
 
diff --git a/xen/include/xsm/xsm.h b/xen/include/xsm/xsm.h
index 2399da0..cba744c 100644
--- a/xen/include/xsm/xsm.h
+++ b/xen/include/xsm/xsm.h
@@ -129,9 +129,10 @@ struct xsm_operations {
 
     long (*do_xsm_op) (XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(xsm_op_t) op);
 
+    int (*hvm_param) (struct domain *d, unsigned long op);
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86
     int (*shadow_control) (struct domain *d, uint32_t op);
-    int (*hvm_param) (struct domain *d, unsigned long op);
     int (*hvm_set_pci_intx_level) (struct domain *d);
     int (*hvm_set_isa_irq_level) (struct domain *d);
     int (*hvm_set_pci_link_route) (struct domain *d);
@@ -487,15 +488,15 @@ static inline long xsm_do_xsm_op
(XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(xsm_op_t) op)
     return xsm_ops->do_xsm_op(op);
 }
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_X86
-static inline int xsm_shadow_control (xsm_default_t def, struct domain *d,
uint32_t op)
+static inline int xsm_hvm_param (xsm_default_t def, struct domain *d, unsigned
long op)
 {
-    return xsm_ops->shadow_control(d, op);
+    return xsm_ops->hvm_param(d, op);
 }
 
-static inline int xsm_hvm_param (xsm_default_t def, struct domain *d, unsigned
long op)
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86
+static inline int xsm_shadow_control (xsm_default_t def, struct domain *d,
uint32_t op)
 {
-    return xsm_ops->hvm_param(d, op);
+    return xsm_ops->shadow_control(d, op);
 }
 
 static inline int xsm_hvm_set_pci_intx_level (xsm_default_t def, struct domain
*d)
diff --git a/xen/xsm/dummy.c b/xen/xsm/dummy.c
index dcd3e31..6f1e0b4 100644
--- a/xen/xsm/dummy.c
+++ b/xen/xsm/dummy.c
@@ -100,6 +100,7 @@ void xsm_fixup_ops (struct xsm_operations *ops)
     set_to_dummy_if_null(ops, page_offline);
     set_to_dummy_if_null(ops, tmem_op);
     set_to_dummy_if_null(ops, tmem_control);
+    set_to_dummy_if_null(ops, hvm_param);
 
     set_to_dummy_if_null(ops, do_xsm_op);
 
@@ -108,7 +109,6 @@ void xsm_fixup_ops (struct xsm_operations *ops)
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86
     set_to_dummy_if_null(ops, shadow_control);
-    set_to_dummy_if_null(ops, hvm_param);
     set_to_dummy_if_null(ops, hvm_set_pci_intx_level);
     set_to_dummy_if_null(ops, hvm_set_isa_irq_level);
     set_to_dummy_if_null(ops, hvm_set_pci_link_route);
diff --git a/xen/xsm/flask/hooks.c b/xen/xsm/flask/hooks.c
index 5869588..85d009c 100644
--- a/xen/xsm/flask/hooks.c
+++ b/xen/xsm/flask/hooks.c
@@ -1068,6 +1068,28 @@ static int flask_remove_from_physmap(struct domain *d1,
struct domain *d2)
     return domain_has_perm(d1, d2, SECCLASS_MMU, MMU__PHYSMAP);
 }
 
+static int flask_hvm_param(struct domain *d, unsigned long op)
+{
+    u32 perm;
+
+    switch ( op )
+    {
+    case HVMOP_set_param:
+        perm = HVM__SETPARAM;
+        break;
+    case HVMOP_get_param:
+        perm = HVM__GETPARAM;
+        break;
+    case HVMOP_track_dirty_vram:
+        perm = HVM__TRACKDIRTYVRAM;
+        break;
+    default:
+        perm = HVM__HVMCTL;
+    }
+
+    return current_has_perm(d, SECCLASS_HVM, perm);
+}
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86
 static int flask_shadow_control(struct domain *d, uint32_t op)
 {
@@ -1148,28 +1170,6 @@ static int flask_ioport_mapping(struct domain *d,
uint32_t start, uint32_t end,
     return flask_ioport_permission(d, start, end, access);
 }
 
-static int flask_hvm_param(struct domain *d, unsigned long op)
-{
-    u32 perm;
-
-    switch ( op )
-    {
-    case HVMOP_set_param:
-        perm = HVM__SETPARAM;
-        break;
-    case HVMOP_get_param:
-        perm = HVM__GETPARAM;
-        break;
-    case HVMOP_track_dirty_vram:
-        perm = HVM__TRACKDIRTYVRAM;
-        break;
-    default:
-        perm = HVM__HVMCTL;
-    }
-
-    return current_has_perm(d, SECCLASS_HVM, perm);
-}
-
 static int flask_hvm_set_pci_intx_level(struct domain *d)
 {
     return current_has_perm(d, SECCLASS_HVM, HVM__PCILEVEL);
@@ -1503,6 +1503,7 @@ static struct xsm_operations flask_ops = {
     .page_offline = flask_page_offline,
     .tmem_op = flask_tmem_op,
     .tmem_control = flask_tmem_control,
+    .hvm_param = flask_hvm_param,
 
     .do_xsm_op = do_flask_op,
 
@@ -1511,7 +1512,6 @@ static struct xsm_operations flask_ops = {
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86
     .shadow_control = flask_shadow_control,
-    .hvm_param = flask_hvm_param,
     .hvm_set_pci_intx_level = flask_hvm_set_pci_intx_level,
     .hvm_set_isa_irq_level = flask_hvm_set_isa_irq_level,
     .hvm_set_pci_link_route = flask_hvm_set_pci_link_route,
-- 
1.8.0.2

Daniel De Graaf

2013-Jan-23 14:37 UTC

head link

Re: [PATCH 0/3] XSM PIRQ and rcu_lock_target cleanup

On 01/18/2013 04:23 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:> On Thu, 2013-01-17 at 18:55 +0000, Daniel De Graaf wrote:
>> These three patches finish up the XSM IS_PRIV reworking, in addition to
>> the patches posted by Ian and Lars fixing things for ARM. I did not
>> include a patch removing the rcu_lock_target_domain_by_id function
>> because it''s still referenced in ARM at the moment, but it
looks like
>> those locations are being changed (or will be changed in the future).
> 
> Am I right that the appropriate transformation is:
> 	rc = rcu_lock_target_domain_by_id(domid, &d);
> becomes:
> 	d = rcu_lock_domain_by_any_id(a.domid);
>         if ( d == NULL )
>             return -ESRCH;
> 
> 	rc = xsm_SOMETHING(XSM_TARGET, d, PARAMS);
> 	if ( rc )
> 	    ... unlock .. return or goto err
> 
> Ian.
> 
Yes, this is correct. Looking at today''s xen-unstable, only the
XENMAPSPACE_gmfn_foreign mapping needs a new ARM-only XSM hook.

-- 
Daniel De Graaf
National Security Agency

Ian Campbell

2013-Jan-23 14:43 UTC

head link

Re: [PATCH 0/3] XSM PIRQ and rcu_lock_target cleanup

On Wed, 2013-01-23 at 14:37 +0000, Daniel De Graaf
wrote:> On 01/18/2013 04:23 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Thu, 2013-01-17 at 18:55 +0000, Daniel De Graaf wrote:
> >> These three patches finish up the XSM IS_PRIV reworking, in
addition to
> >> the patches posted by Ian and Lars fixing things for ARM. I did
not
> >> include a patch removing the rcu_lock_target_domain_by_id function
> >> because it''s still referenced in ARM at the moment, but
it looks like
> >> those locations are being changed (or will be changed in the
future).
> > 
> > Am I right that the appropriate transformation is:
> > 	rc = rcu_lock_target_domain_by_id(domid, &d);
> > becomes:
> > 	d = rcu_lock_domain_by_any_id(a.domid);
> >         if ( d == NULL )
> >             return -ESRCH;
> > 
> > 	rc = xsm_SOMETHING(XSM_TARGET, d, PARAMS);
> > 	if ( rc )
> > 	    ... unlock .. return or goto err
> > 
> > Ian.
> > 
> 
> Yes, this is correct. Looking at today''s xen-unstable, only the
> XENMAPSPACE_gmfn_foreign mapping needs a new ARM-only XSM hook.
Does it? Even on x86 xsm only has a single xsm_add_to_physmap covering
all XENMAPSPACE cases and ARM matches this.

Ian.

Daniel De Graaf

2013-Jan-23 14:51 UTC

head link

Re: [PATCH 0/3] XSM PIRQ and rcu_lock_target cleanup

On 01/23/2013 09:43 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:> On Wed, 2013-01-23 at 14:37 +0000, Daniel De Graaf wrote:
>> On 01/18/2013 04:23 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2013-01-17 at 18:55 +0000, Daniel De Graaf wrote:
>>>> These three patches finish up the XSM IS_PRIV reworking, in
addition to
>>>> the patches posted by Ian and Lars fixing things for ARM. I did
not
>>>> include a patch removing the rcu_lock_target_domain_by_id
function
>>>> because it''s still referenced in ARM at the moment,
but it looks like
>>>> those locations are being changed (or will be changed in the
future).
>>>
>>> Am I right that the appropriate transformation is:
>>> 	rc = rcu_lock_target_domain_by_id(domid, &d);
>>> becomes:
>>> 	d = rcu_lock_domain_by_any_id(a.domid);
>>>         if ( d == NULL )
>>>             return -ESRCH;
>>>
>>> 	rc = xsm_SOMETHING(XSM_TARGET, d, PARAMS);
>>> 	if ( rc )
>>> 	    ... unlock .. return or goto err
>>>
>>> Ian.
>>>
>>
>> Yes, this is correct. Looking at today''s xen-unstable, only
the
>> XENMAPSPACE_gmfn_foreign mapping needs a new ARM-only XSM hook.
> 
> Does it? Even on x86 xsm only has a single xsm_add_to_physmap covering
> all XENMAPSPACE cases and ARM matches this.
> 
> Ian.
> 
Since x86 doesn''t implement XENMAPSPACE_gmfn_foreign, it
doesn''t need
another check. The additional check would ensure that the domain doing
the mapping has access to the foreign pages, while the existing checks
verify that it has the right to change the physmap being modified.

-- 
Daniel De Graaf
National Security Agency

Ian Campbell

2013-Jan-23 14:57 UTC

head link

Re: [PATCH 0/3] XSM PIRQ and rcu_lock_target cleanup

On Wed, 2013-01-23 at 14:51 +0000, Daniel De Graaf
wrote:> On 01/23/2013 09:43 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Wed, 2013-01-23 at 14:37 +0000, Daniel De Graaf wrote:
> >> On 01/18/2013 04:23 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 2013-01-17 at 18:55 +0000, Daniel De Graaf wrote:
> >>>> These three patches finish up the XSM IS_PRIV reworking,
in addition to
> >>>> the patches posted by Ian and Lars fixing things for ARM.
I did not
> >>>> include a patch removing the rcu_lock_target_domain_by_id
function
> >>>> because it''s still referenced in ARM at the
moment, but it looks like
> >>>> those locations are being changed (or will be changed in
the future).
> >>>
> >>> Am I right that the appropriate transformation is:
> >>> 	rc = rcu_lock_target_domain_by_id(domid, &d);
> >>> becomes:
> >>> 	d = rcu_lock_domain_by_any_id(a.domid);
> >>>         if ( d == NULL )
> >>>             return -ESRCH;
> >>>
> >>> 	rc = xsm_SOMETHING(XSM_TARGET, d, PARAMS);
> >>> 	if ( rc )
> >>> 	    ... unlock .. return or goto err
> >>>
> >>> Ian.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Yes, this is correct. Looking at today''s xen-unstable,
only the
> >> XENMAPSPACE_gmfn_foreign mapping needs a new ARM-only XSM hook.
> > 
> > Does it? Even on x86 xsm only has a single xsm_add_to_physmap covering
> > all XENMAPSPACE cases and ARM matches this.
> > 
> > Ian.
> > 
> 
> Since x86 doesn''t implement XENMAPSPACE_gmfn_foreign, it
doesn''t need
> another check. The additional check would ensure that the domain doing
> the mapping has access to the foreign pages, while the existing checks
> verify that it has the right to change the physmap being modified.
Ah, right yes.

x86 will need this too when PVH lands.

Ian.

Ian Campbell

2013-Jan-31 09:16 UTC

head link

Re: [PATCH 3/3] xen/arch/arm: add XSM hook to HVMOP_{get, set}_param

On Fri, 2013-01-18 at 09:19 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:> On Thu, 2013-01-17 at 18:55 +0000, Daniel De Graaf wrote:
> > This hook is not x86-specific; move it out of CONFIG_X86.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel De Graaf <dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov>
> > Cc: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
> > Cc: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@citrix.com>
> > Cc: Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>
> 
> Looks good to me (other than diff choosing the most confusing possible
> way to represent the movement of xsm_hvm_param in xsm.h!)
> 
> Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Looks like I should have actually built this one before acking...

8<--------------------------------

From f2ec1f2cba7eab8d6c6c93378625379abe0e29bc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 09:14:40 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] xen: arm: fix build of hvm.c

Add include of xsm/xsm.h to fix:

hvm.c: In function ''do_hvm_op'': hvm.c:37:9: error: implicit
declaration of function ''xsm_hvm_param''
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
hvm.c:37:9: error: nested extern declaration of
''xsm_hvm_param'' [-Werror=nested-externs]
hvm.c:37:28: error: ''XSM_TARGET'' undeclared (first use in this
function)
hvm.c:37:28: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each
function it appears in
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors

Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: Daniel De Graaf <dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov>
Cc: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@citrix.com>
Cc: Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>
---
 xen/arch/arm/hvm.c |    2 ++
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/hvm.c b/xen/arch/arm/hvm.c
index 63ac793..471c4cd 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/hvm.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/hvm.c
@@ -5,6 +5,8 @@
 #include <xen/guest_access.h>
 #include <xen/sched.h>
 
+#include <xsm/xsm.h>
+
 #include <public/xen.h>
 #include <public/hvm/params.h>
 #include <public/hvm/hvm_op.h>
-- 
1.7.9.1

Ian Campbell

2013-Feb-05 10:59 UTC

head link

Re: [PATCH 3/3] xen/arch/arm: add XSM hook to HVMOP_{get, set}_param

Stefano, Tim, can you (n)ack this please.

On Thu, 2013-01-31 at 09:16 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:> 8<--------------------------------
> 
> From f2ec1f2cba7eab8d6c6c93378625379abe0e29bc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
> Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 09:14:40 +0000
> Subject: [PATCH] xen: arm: fix build of hvm.c
> 
> Add include of xsm/xsm.h to fix:
> 
> hvm.c: In function ''do_hvm_op'': hvm.c:37:9: error:
implicit declaration of function ''xsm_hvm_param''
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> hvm.c:37:9: error: nested extern declaration of
''xsm_hvm_param'' [-Werror=nested-externs]
> hvm.c:37:28: error: ''XSM_TARGET'' undeclared (first use in
this function)
> hvm.c:37:28: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for
each function it appears in
> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
> Cc: Daniel De Graaf <dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov>
> Cc: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@citrix.com>
> Cc: Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>
> ---
>  xen/arch/arm/hvm.c |    2 ++
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/hvm.c b/xen/arch/arm/hvm.c
> index 63ac793..471c4cd 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/hvm.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/hvm.c
> @@ -5,6 +5,8 @@
>  #include <xen/guest_access.h>
>  #include <xen/sched.h>
>  
> +#include <xsm/xsm.h>
> +
>  #include <public/xen.h>
>  #include <public/hvm/params.h>
>  #include <public/hvm/hvm_op.h>

Stefano Stabellini

2013-Feb-05 11:31 UTC

head link

Re: [PATCH 3/3] xen/arch/arm: add XSM hook to HVMOP_{get, set}_param

On Tue, 5 Feb 2013, Ian Campbell wrote:> Stefano, Tim, can you (n)ack this please.
The patch seems simple enough.

Acked-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
> On Thu, 2013-01-31 at 09:16 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > 8<--------------------------------
> > 
> > From f2ec1f2cba7eab8d6c6c93378625379abe0e29bc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
> > Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 09:14:40 +0000
> > Subject: [PATCH] xen: arm: fix build of hvm.c
> > 
> > Add include of xsm/xsm.h to fix:
> > 
> > hvm.c: In function ''do_hvm_op'': hvm.c:37:9: error:
implicit declaration of function ''xsm_hvm_param''
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > hvm.c:37:9: error: nested extern declaration of
''xsm_hvm_param'' [-Werror=nested-externs]
> > hvm.c:37:28: error: ''XSM_TARGET'' undeclared (first
use in this function)
> > hvm.c:37:28: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once
for each function it appears in
> > cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
> > Cc: Daniel De Graaf <dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov>
> > Cc: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@citrix.com>
> > Cc: Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>
> > ---
> >  xen/arch/arm/hvm.c |    2 ++
> >  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/hvm.c b/xen/arch/arm/hvm.c
> > index 63ac793..471c4cd 100644
> > --- a/xen/arch/arm/hvm.c
> > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/hvm.c
> > @@ -5,6 +5,8 @@
> >  #include <xen/guest_access.h>
> >  #include <xen/sched.h>
> >  
> > +#include <xsm/xsm.h>
> > +
> >  #include <public/xen.h>
> >  #include <public/hvm/params.h>
> >  #include <public/hvm/hvm_op.h>
> 
> 
>

Ian Campbell

2013-Feb-05 11:46 UTC

head link

Re: [PATCH 3/3] xen/arch/arm: add XSM hook to HVMOP_{get, set}_param

On Tue, 2013-02-05 at 11:31 +0000, Stefano Stabellini
wrote:> On Tue, 5 Feb 2013, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > Stefano, Tim, can you (n)ack this please.
> 
> The patch seems simple enough.
> 
> Acked-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Applied, thanks.

Xen devel - Jan 2013 - [PATCH 0/3] XSM PIRQ and rcu_lock_target cleanup

[PATCH 0/3] XSM PIRQ and rcu_lock_target cleanup

[PATCH 1/3] hvm: wire up domctl and xsm hypercalls

[PATCH 2/3] xen/arch/x86: complete XSM hooks on irq/pirq mappings

[PATCH 3/3] xen/arch/arm: add XSM hook to HVMOP_{get, set}_param

Re: [PATCH 3/3] xen/arch/arm: add XSM hook to HVMOP_{get, set}_param

Re: [PATCH 0/3] XSM PIRQ and rcu_lock_target cleanup

Re: [PATCH 3/3] xen/arch/arm: add XSM hook to HVMOP_{get, set}_param

[PATCH v2 3/3] xen/arch/arm: add XSM hook to HVMOP_{get, set}_param

Re: [PATCH 0/3] XSM PIRQ and rcu_lock_target cleanup

Re: [PATCH 0/3] XSM PIRQ and rcu_lock_target cleanup

Re: [PATCH 0/3] XSM PIRQ and rcu_lock_target cleanup

Re: [PATCH 0/3] XSM PIRQ and rcu_lock_target cleanup

Re: [PATCH 3/3] xen/arch/arm: add XSM hook to HVMOP_{get, set}_param

Re: [PATCH 3/3] xen/arch/arm: add XSM hook to HVMOP_{get, set}_param

Re: [PATCH 3/3] xen/arch/arm: add XSM hook to HVMOP_{get, set}_param

Re: [PATCH 3/3] xen/arch/arm: add XSM hook to HVMOP_{get, set}_param