flight 13924 xen-unstable real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/13924/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf 5 xen-boot fail like 13923 test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf-pin 10 guest-saverestore fail like 13923 test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 9 guest-localmigrate fail like 13923 test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 9 guest-localmigrate fail like 13923 Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-amd64-i386-win-vcpus1 16 leak-check/check fail never pass test-amd64-i386-xl-win-vcpus1 13 guest-stop fail never pass test-amd64-amd64-win 16 leak-check/check fail never pass test-amd64-amd64-xl-winxpsp3 13 guest-stop fail never pass test-amd64-i386-xl-win7-amd64 13 guest-stop fail never pass test-amd64-i386-xend-winxpsp3 16 leak-check/check fail never pass test-amd64-i386-win 16 leak-check/check fail never pass test-amd64-i386-xl-winxpsp3-vcpus1 13 guest-stop fail never pass test-amd64-amd64-xl-win7-amd64 13 guest-stop fail never pass test-amd64-amd64-xl-pcipt-intel 9 guest-start fail never pass test-amd64-amd64-xl-win 13 guest-stop fail never pass version targeted for testing: xen 032de7030d20 baseline version: xen 032de7030d20 jobs: build-amd64 pass build-i386 pass build-amd64-oldkern pass build-i386-oldkern pass build-amd64-pvops pass build-i386-pvops pass test-amd64-amd64-xl pass test-amd64-i386-xl pass test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd pass test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-amd pass test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 fail test-amd64-amd64-xl-win7-amd64 fail test-amd64-i386-xl-win7-amd64 fail test-amd64-i386-xl-credit2 pass test-amd64-amd64-xl-pcipt-intel fail test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel pass test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-intel pass test-amd64-i386-xl-multivcpu pass test-amd64-amd64-pair pass test-amd64-i386-pair pass test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf-pin fail test-amd64-amd64-pv pass test-amd64-i386-pv pass test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf fail test-amd64-i386-win-vcpus1 fail test-amd64-i386-xl-win-vcpus1 fail test-amd64-i386-xl-winxpsp3-vcpus1 fail test-amd64-amd64-win fail test-amd64-i386-win fail test-amd64-amd64-xl-win fail test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 fail test-amd64-i386-xend-winxpsp3 fail test-amd64-amd64-xl-winxpsp3 fail ------------------------------------------------------------ sg-report-flight on woking.cam.xci-test.com logs: /home/xc_osstest/logs images: /home/xc_osstest/images Logs, config files, etc. are available at http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs Test harness code can be found at http://xenbits.xensource.com/gitweb?p=osstest.git;a=summary Published tested tree is already up to date.
On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 07:35 +0100, xen.org wrote:> flight 13924 xen-unstable real [real] > http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/13924/ > > Failures :-/ but no regressions. > > Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): > test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf 5 xen-boot fail like 13923 >So, sorry for noticing this only now, but it seems the sedf test is failing to boot since flight 13900 (Sept 28). It seems to me that, from hat day on, this particular test is always running on the same machine (gall-mite). OTOH, 13900 run on a different one (moss-bug) and worked well. From a super quick inspection of the logs, I couldn''t spot anything particular that can be causing the failures, so I''m asking here: could it be something somehow machine-related? I remember you (IanJ) telling that there might be some problems with the test system in these days... Is that the case or should I be investigating more thoroughly? (In the latter case, I think I can have a look at it next week). Thanks and Regards, Dario -- <<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://retis.sssup.it/people/faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
Dario Faggioli writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 13924: tolerable FAIL"):> So, sorry for noticing this only now, but it seems the sedf test is > failing to boot since flight 13900 (Sept 28). > > It seems to me that, from hat day on, this particular test is always > running on the same machine (gall-mite). OTOH, 13900 run on a different > one (moss-bug) and worked well.The tester likes to reuse the same machine when the test fails. That means that when a new machine-specific bug is introduced, it blocks a push.> From a super quick inspection of the logs, I couldn''t spot anything > particular that can be causing the failures, so I''m asking here: could > it be something somehow machine-related?It''s quite possible.> I remember you (IanJ) telling that there might be some problems with the > test system in these days... Is that the case or should I be > investigating more thoroughly? (In the latter case, I think I can have a > look at it next week).I am not aware of any problems that might suggest this was a false failure. Given the test history I would expect that this is a real bug. Ian.