Calling irq_complete_move() from .disable is wrong, breaking S3 resume. Comparing with all other .ack actors, it was also missing a call to move_{native,masked}_irq(). As the actor is masking its interrupt anyway (albeit it''s not immediately obvious why), the latter is the better choice. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c @@ -1039,8 +1039,6 @@ static void dma_msi_mask(struct irq_desc unsigned long flags; struct iommu *iommu = desc->action->dev_id; - irq_complete_move(desc); - /* mask it */ spin_lock_irqsave(&iommu->register_lock, flags); dmar_writel(iommu->reg, DMAR_FECTL_REG, DMA_FECTL_IM); @@ -1053,6 +1051,13 @@ static unsigned int dma_msi_startup(stru return 0; } +static void dma_msi_ack(struct irq_desc *desc) +{ + irq_complete_move(desc); + dma_msi_mask(desc); + move_masked_irq(desc); +} + static void dma_msi_end(struct irq_desc *desc, u8 vector) { dma_msi_unmask(desc); @@ -1114,7 +1119,7 @@ static hw_irq_controller dma_msi_type = .shutdown = dma_msi_mask, .enable = dma_msi_unmask, .disable = dma_msi_mask, - .ack = dma_msi_mask, + .ack = dma_msi_ack, .end = dma_msi_end, .set_affinity = dma_msi_set_affinity, }; _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
Keir Fraser
2012-Sep-07 15:05 UTC
Re: [PATCH] VT-d: split .ack and .disable DMA-MSI actors
On 07/09/2012 13:45, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:> Calling irq_complete_move() from .disable is wrong, breaking S3 resume. > > Comparing with all other .ack actors, it was also missing a call to > move_{native,masked}_irq(). As the actor is masking its interrupt > anyway (albeit it''s not immediately obvious why), the latter is the > better choice. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>As far as I understand it Acked-by: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org> I guess you are looking for an Intel ack as well. -- Keir> --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c > +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c > @@ -1039,8 +1039,6 @@ static void dma_msi_mask(struct irq_desc > unsigned long flags; > struct iommu *iommu = desc->action->dev_id; > > - irq_complete_move(desc); > - > /* mask it */ > spin_lock_irqsave(&iommu->register_lock, flags); > dmar_writel(iommu->reg, DMAR_FECTL_REG, DMA_FECTL_IM); > @@ -1053,6 +1051,13 @@ static unsigned int dma_msi_startup(stru > return 0; > } > > +static void dma_msi_ack(struct irq_desc *desc) > +{ > + irq_complete_move(desc); > + dma_msi_mask(desc); > + move_masked_irq(desc); > +} > + > static void dma_msi_end(struct irq_desc *desc, u8 vector) > { > dma_msi_unmask(desc); > @@ -1114,7 +1119,7 @@ static hw_irq_controller dma_msi_type > .shutdown = dma_msi_mask, > .enable = dma_msi_unmask, > .disable = dma_msi_mask, > - .ack = dma_msi_mask, > + .ack = dma_msi_ack, > .end = dma_msi_end, > .set_affinity = dma_msi_set_affinity, > }; > > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xen.org > http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
Jan Beulich
2012-Sep-07 15:51 UTC
Re: [PATCH] VT-d: split .ack and .disable DMA-MSI actors
>>> On 07.09.12 at 17:05, Keir Fraser <keir.xen@gmail.com> wrote: > On 07/09/2012 13:45, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote: > >> Calling irq_complete_move() from .disable is wrong, breaking S3 resume. >> >> Comparing with all other .ack actors, it was also missing a call to >> move_{native,masked}_irq(). As the actor is masking its interrupt >> anyway (albeit it''s not immediately obvious why), the latter is the >> better choice. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> > > As far as I understand it > Acked-by: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org> > > I guess you are looking for an Intel ack as well.Yes, that''s why I Cc-ed Xiantao. Jan
Zhang, Xiantao
2012-Sep-10 02:28 UTC
Re: [PATCH] VT-d: split .ack and .disable DMA-MSI actors
> -----Original Message----- > From: Jan Beulich [mailto:JBeulich@suse.com] > Sent: Friday, September 07, 2012 11:52 PM > To: Keir Fraser; xen-devel > Cc: Zhang, Xiantao > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: split .ack and .disable DMA-MSI > actors > > >>> On 07.09.12 at 17:05, Keir Fraser <keir.xen@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 07/09/2012 13:45, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote: > > > >> Calling irq_complete_move() from .disable is wrong, breaking S3 resume. > >> > >> Comparing with all other .ack actors, it was also missing a call to > >> move_{native,masked}_irq(). As the actor is masking its interrupt > >> anyway (albeit it''s not immediately obvious why), the latter is the > >> better choice. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> > > > > As far as I understand it > > Acked-by: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org> > > > > I guess you are looking for an Intel ack as well. > > Yes, that''s why I Cc-ed Xiantao.Thanks for the fix! Acked-by Xiantao Zhang <xiantao.zhang@intel.com>! Xiantao