Xen devel - Jul 2012 - about libxc/ia64/

Hello,

Just out of curiosity, IIRC we killed ia64, right? If yes, is it fine
for this dir to be still there: 

$ ls tools/libxc/ia64/
ac_ia64_tools.h          Makefile                 xc_dom_ia64_util.c      
xc_ia64_dom_fwloader.c   xc_ia64_hvm_build.c      xc_ia64_linux_save.c    
xc_ia64_stubs.c
dom_fw_acpi.c            sal.h                    xc_dom_ia64_util.h      
xc_ia64.h                xc_ia64_linux_restore.c  xc_ia64_save_restore.h

Again, just asking because these files are polluting my grep-s, and I
started wondering whether or not that is happening for a good reason.

If the question is stupid, just ignore it and forgive me. :-)

Thanks and Regards,
Dario

-- 
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://retis.sssup.it/people/faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 18:44 +0100, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Just out of curiosity, IIRC we killed ia64, right? If yes, is it fine
> for this dir to be still there: 
> $ ls tools/libxc/ia64/
I think it just got missed. IIRC Jan (or Keir?) only patched the
hypervisor itself.

We can probably clear these out at our leisure.

Ian.

>>> On 27.07.12 at 08:59, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 18:44 +0100, Dario Faggioli wrote:
>> Hello,
>> 
>> Just out of curiosity, IIRC we killed ia64, right? If yes, is it fine
>> for this dir to be still there: 
> 
>> $ ls tools/libxc/ia64/
> 
> I think it just got missed. IIRC Jan (or Keir?) only patched the
> hypervisor itself.
It was actually intentional that I only cleaned up the hypervisor,
leaving the tools side to the tools maintainers (as likely proper
cleanup implies more than just deleting these files).

Jan