Anthony PERARD
2012-Jul-02 15:41 UTC
[PATCH V3] xen: Fix BUFIOREQ evtchn init for a stubdom.
This is a missing part from the previous patch that add the BUFIOREQ_EVTCHN parameter. This patch changes the ownership of the buifioreq event channel to the stubdom (when HVM_PARAM_DM_DOMAIN is set within the stubdom). This patch introduces an helper to replace a xen port. This fix the initialization of QEMU inside the stubdomain. Signed-off-by: Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@citrix.com> --- Change v3: For the bufioreq replacement: - the code is now out of the vcpu loop - the code does not take a lock anymore - rename int *port to int *p_port Change v2: - an helper - the replacement of the buferioreq evtchn is inside iorp->lock now. xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------- 1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c index e0d495d..c2dfa73 100644 --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c @@ -3664,6 +3664,21 @@ static int hvmop_flush_tlb_all(void) return 0; } +static int hvm_replace_event_channel(struct vcpu *v, uint64_t remote_domid, + int *p_port) +{ + int old_port, new_port; + + new_port = alloc_unbound_xen_event_channel(v, remote_domid, NULL); + if ( new_port < 0 ) + return new_port; + + /* xchg() ensures that only we free_xen_event_channel() */ + old_port = xchg(p_port, new_port); + free_xen_event_channel(v, old_port); + return 0; +} + long do_hvm_op(unsigned long op, XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(void) arg) { @@ -3775,19 +3790,16 @@ long do_hvm_op(unsigned long op, XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(void) arg) rc = 0; domain_pause(d); /* safe to change per-vcpu xen_port */ iorp = &d->arch.hvm_domain.ioreq; + if (d->vcpu[0]) + hvm_replace_event_channel(d->vcpu[0], a.value, + (int*)&d->vcpu[0]->domain->arch.hvm_domain.params[HVM_PARAM_BUFIOREQ_EVTCHN]); for_each_vcpu ( d, v ) { - int old_port, new_port; - new_port = alloc_unbound_xen_event_channel( - v, a.value, NULL); - if ( new_port < 0 ) - { - rc = new_port; + rc = hvm_replace_event_channel(v, a.value, + &v->arch.hvm_vcpu.xen_port); + if ( rc ) break; - } - /* xchg() ensures that only we free_xen_event_channel() */ - old_port = xchg(&v->arch.hvm_vcpu.xen_port, new_port); - free_xen_event_channel(v, old_port); + spin_lock(&iorp->lock); if ( iorp->va != NULL ) get_ioreq(v)->vp_eport = v->arch.hvm_vcpu.xen_port; -- Anthony PERARD
Jan Beulich
2012-Jul-02 15:58 UTC
Re: [PATCH V3] xen: Fix BUFIOREQ evtchn init for a stubdom.
>>> On 02.07.12 at 17:41, Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@citrix.com> wrote: > This is a missing part from the previous patch that add the BUFIOREQ_EVTCHN > parameter. This patch changes the ownership of the buifioreq event channel > to > the stubdom (when HVM_PARAM_DM_DOMAIN is set within the stubdom). > > This patch introduces an helper to replace a xen port. > > This fix the initialization of QEMU inside the stubdomain. > > Signed-off-by: Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@citrix.com> > --- > Change v3: > For the bufioreq replacement: > - the code is now out of the vcpu loop > - the code does not take a lock anymore > - rename int *port to int *p_port > Change v2: > - an helper > - the replacement of the buferioreq evtchn is inside iorp->lock now. > > xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------- > 1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c > index e0d495d..c2dfa73 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c > @@ -3664,6 +3664,21 @@ static int hvmop_flush_tlb_all(void) > return 0; > } > > +static int hvm_replace_event_channel(struct vcpu *v, uint64_t remote_domid, > + int *p_port) > +{ > + int old_port, new_port; > + > + new_port = alloc_unbound_xen_event_channel(v, remote_domid, NULL); > + if ( new_port < 0 ) > + return new_port; > + > + /* xchg() ensures that only we free_xen_event_channel() */ > + old_port = xchg(p_port, new_port); > + free_xen_event_channel(v, old_port); > + return 0; > +} > + > long do_hvm_op(unsigned long op, XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(void) arg) > > { > @@ -3775,19 +3790,16 @@ long do_hvm_op(unsigned long op, > XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(void) arg) > rc = 0; > domain_pause(d); /* safe to change per-vcpu xen_port */ > iorp = &d->arch.hvm_domain.ioreq; > + if (d->vcpu[0]) > + hvm_replace_event_channel(d->vcpu[0], a.value, > + (int*)&d->vcpu[0]->domain->arch.hvm_domain.params[HVM_PARAM_BUFIOREQ_EVTCHN]);Did I overlook this in v2? You clearly need to handle the error case here (it is being handled, albeit - but that''s not your patch''s fault - only in a rudimentary way, inside the loop). Jan> for_each_vcpu ( d, v ) > { > - int old_port, new_port; > - new_port = alloc_unbound_xen_event_channel( > - v, a.value, NULL); > - if ( new_port < 0 ) > - { > - rc = new_port; > + rc = hvm_replace_event_channel(v, a.value, > + > &v->arch.hvm_vcpu.xen_port); > + if ( rc ) > break; > - } > - /* xchg() ensures that only we free_xen_event_channel() > */ > - old_port = xchg(&v->arch.hvm_vcpu.xen_port, new_port); > - free_xen_event_channel(v, old_port); > + > spin_lock(&iorp->lock); > if ( iorp->va != NULL ) > get_ioreq(v)->vp_eport = v->arch.hvm_vcpu.xen_port; > -- > Anthony PERARD
Jan Beulich
2012-Jul-02 16:01 UTC
Re: [PATCH V3] xen: Fix BUFIOREQ evtchn init for a stubdom.
>>> On 02.07.12 at 17:58, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote: >> @@ -3775,19 +3790,16 @@ long do_hvm_op(unsigned long op, >> XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(void) arg) >> rc = 0; >> domain_pause(d); /* safe to change per-vcpu xen_port */ >> iorp = &d->arch.hvm_domain.ioreq; >> + if (d->vcpu[0]) >> + hvm_replace_event_channel(d->vcpu[0], a.value, >> + (int*)&d->vcpu[0]->domain->arch.hvm_domain.params[HVM_PARAM_BUFIOREQ_EVTCHN]); > > Did I overlook this in v2? You clearly need to handle the error > case here (it is being handled, albeit - but that''s not your patch''s > fault - only in a rudimentary way, inside the loop).Probably it''ll be easiest if I - or Keir if he''s faster - add this while committing, to save you from posting another version. Jan
Anthony PERARD
2012-Jul-02 16:05 UTC
Re: [PATCH V3] xen: Fix BUFIOREQ evtchn init for a stubdom.
On 02/07/12 16:58, Jan Beulich wrote:>>>> On 02.07.12 at 17:41, Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@citrix.com> wrote: >> This is a missing part from the previous patch that add the BUFIOREQ_EVTCHN >> parameter. This patch changes the ownership of the buifioreq event channel >> to >> the stubdom (when HVM_PARAM_DM_DOMAIN is set within the stubdom). >> >> This patch introduces an helper to replace a xen port. >> >> This fix the initialization of QEMU inside the stubdomain. >> >> Signed-off-by: Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@citrix.com> >> --- >> Change v3: >> For the bufioreq replacement: >> - the code is now out of the vcpu loop >> - the code does not take a lock anymore >> - rename int *port to int *p_port >> Change v2: >> - an helper >> - the replacement of the buferioreq evtchn is inside iorp->lock now. >> >> xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------- >> 1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c >> index e0d495d..c2dfa73 100644 >> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c >> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c >> @@ -3664,6 +3664,21 @@ static int hvmop_flush_tlb_all(void) >> return 0; >> } >> >> +static int hvm_replace_event_channel(struct vcpu *v, uint64_t remote_domid, >> + int *p_port) >> +{ >> + int old_port, new_port; >> + >> + new_port = alloc_unbound_xen_event_channel(v, remote_domid, NULL); >> + if ( new_port < 0 ) >> + return new_port; >> + >> + /* xchg() ensures that only we free_xen_event_channel() */ >> + old_port = xchg(p_port, new_port); >> + free_xen_event_channel(v, old_port); >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> long do_hvm_op(unsigned long op, XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(void) arg) >> >> { >> @@ -3775,19 +3790,16 @@ long do_hvm_op(unsigned long op, >> XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(void) arg) >> rc = 0; >> domain_pause(d); /* safe to change per-vcpu xen_port */ >> iorp = &d->arch.hvm_domain.ioreq; >> + if (d->vcpu[0]) >> + hvm_replace_event_channel(d->vcpu[0], a.value, >> + (int*)&d->vcpu[0]->domain->arch.hvm_domain.params[HVM_PARAM_BUFIOREQ_EVTCHN]); > > Did I overlook this in v2? You clearly need to handle the error > case here (it is being handled, albeit - but that''s not your patch''s > fault - only in a rudimentary way, inside the loop).Well, if there is an error with the replace, it just break the for_each loop and do domain_unpause. So my guest was to leave it fail a second time :). But here, how should I handle the error case? If there is an error, should I not go into the for_each and go strait to domain_unpause (with the rc value set)?>> for_each_vcpu ( d, v ) >> { >> - int old_port, new_port; >> - new_port = alloc_unbound_xen_event_channel( >> - v, a.value, NULL); >> - if ( new_port < 0 ) >> - { >> - rc = new_port; >> + rc = hvm_replace_event_channel(v, a.value, >> + >> &v->arch.hvm_vcpu.xen_port); >> + if ( rc ) >> break; >> - } >> - /* xchg() ensures that only we free_xen_event_channel() >> */ >> - old_port = xchg(&v->arch.hvm_vcpu.xen_port, new_port); >> - free_xen_event_channel(v, old_port); >> + >> spin_lock(&iorp->lock); >> if ( iorp->va != NULL ) >> get_ioreq(v)->vp_eport = v->arch.hvm_vcpu.xen_port; >> -- >> Anthony PERARD > > >-- Anthony PERARD
Keir Fraser
2012-Jul-02 19:37 UTC
Re: [PATCH V3] xen: Fix BUFIOREQ evtchn init for a stubdom.
On 02/07/2012 17:01, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:>>>> On 02.07.12 at 17:58, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote: >>> @@ -3775,19 +3790,16 @@ long do_hvm_op(unsigned long op, >>> XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(void) arg) >>> rc = 0; >>> domain_pause(d); /* safe to change per-vcpu xen_port */ >>> iorp = &d->arch.hvm_domain.ioreq; >>> + if (d->vcpu[0]) >>> + hvm_replace_event_channel(d->vcpu[0], a.value, >>> + >>> (int*)&d->vcpu[0]->domain->arch.hvm_domain.params[HVM_PARAM_BUFIOREQ_EVTCHN] >>> ); >> >> Did I overlook this in v2? You clearly need to handle the error >> case here (it is being handled, albeit - but that''s not your patch''s >> fault - only in a rudimentary way, inside the loop). > > Probably it''ll be easiest if I - or Keir if he''s faster - add this while > committing, to save you from posting another version.I''m travelling so please just go ahead, Jan. K.> Jan >