thr3ads.net - Xen devel - [PATCH v2 ]libxl: allow to allocate cpumap with specific size [Jun 2012]

If this information is useful, please help other people find it:
Share via:

Zhang, Yang Z

2012-Jun-01 02:41 UTC

[PATCH v2 ]libxl: allow to allocate cpumap with specific size

Currently, libxl_cpumap_alloc()allocate the cpumap with size of max_cpus. In
some place, we may want to allocate specific size of cpumap.
This patch allow to pass a argument to specific the size that you want to
allocate. If pass 0, it means the size is equal to number of max_cpus.

Signed-off-by: Yang Zhang <yang.z.zhang@Intel.com>

diff -r d7318231cfe3 -r 3b0eed731020 tools/libxl/libxl.c
--- a/tools/libxl/libxl.c       Thu May 31 10:18:52 2012 +0200
+++ b/tools/libxl/libxl.c       Fri Jun 01 09:27:17 2012 +0800
@@ -577,7 +577,7 @@ libxl_cpupoolinfo * libxl_list_cpupool(l
         ptr[i].poolid = info->cpupool_id;
         ptr[i].sched = info->sched_id;
         ptr[i].n_dom = info->n_dom;
-        if (libxl_cpumap_alloc(ctx, &ptr[i].cpumap)) {
+        if (libxl_cpumap_alloc(ctx, &ptr[i].cpumap, 0)) {
             xc_cpupool_infofree(ctx->xch, info);
             break;
         }
@@ -3177,7 +3177,7 @@ libxl_vcpuinfo *libxl_list_vcpu(libxl_ct
     }

     for (*nb_vcpu = 0; *nb_vcpu <= domaininfo.max_vcpu_id; ++*nb_vcpu,
++ptr) {
-        if (libxl_cpumap_alloc(ctx, &ptr->cpumap)) {
+        if (libxl_cpumap_alloc(ctx, &ptr->cpumap, 0)) {
             LIBXL__LOG_ERRNO(ctx, LIBXL__LOG_ERROR, "allocating
cpumap");
             return NULL;
         }
@@ -3854,8 +3854,8 @@ int libxl_cpupool_destroy(libxl_ctx *ctx
     if ((info->cpupool_id != poolid) || (info->n_dom))
         goto out;

-    rc = ERROR_NOMEM;
-    if (libxl_cpumap_alloc(ctx, &cpumap))
+    rc = libxl_cpumap_alloc(ctx, &cpumap, 0);
+    if (rc)
         goto out;

     memcpy(cpumap.map, info->cpumap, cpumap.size);
diff -r d7318231cfe3 -r 3b0eed731020 tools/libxl/libxl_create.c
--- a/tools/libxl/libxl_create.c        Thu May 31 10:18:52 2012 +0200
+++ b/tools/libxl/libxl_create.c        Fri Jun 01 09:27:17 2012 +0800
@@ -150,8 +150,8 @@ int libxl__domain_build_info_setdefault(
         b_info->cur_vcpus = 1;

     if (!b_info->cpumap.size) {
-        if (libxl_cpumap_alloc(CTX, &b_info->cpumap))
-            return ERROR_NOMEM;
+        if (libxl_cpumap_alloc(CTX, &b_info->cpumap, 0))
+            return ERROR_FAIL;
         libxl_cpumap_set_any(&b_info->cpumap);
     }

diff -r d7318231cfe3 -r 3b0eed731020 tools/libxl/libxl_utils.c
--- a/tools/libxl/libxl_utils.c Thu May 31 10:18:52 2012 +0200
+++ b/tools/libxl/libxl_utils.c Fri Jun 01 09:27:17 2012 +0800
@@ -490,19 +490,19 @@ int libxl_mac_to_device_nic(libxl_ctx *c
     return rc;
 }

-int libxl_cpumap_alloc(libxl_ctx *ctx, libxl_cpumap *cpumap)
+int libxl_cpumap_alloc(libxl_ctx *ctx, libxl_cpumap *cpumap, int max_cpus)
 {
-    int max_cpus;
     int sz;

-    max_cpus = libxl_get_max_cpus(ctx);
+    if (max_cpus < 0)
+        return ERROR_INVAL;
+    if (max_cpus == 0)
+        max_cpus = libxl_get_max_cpus(ctx);
     if (max_cpus == 0)
         return ERROR_FAIL;

     sz = (max_cpus + 7) / 8;
-    cpumap->map = calloc(sz, sizeof(*cpumap->map));
-    if (!cpumap->map)
-        return ERROR_NOMEM;
+    cpumap->map = libxl__calloc(NULL, sizeof(*cpumap->map), sz);
     cpumap->size = sz;
     return 0;
 }
diff -r d7318231cfe3 -r 3b0eed731020 tools/libxl/libxl_utils.h
--- a/tools/libxl/libxl_utils.h Thu May 31 10:18:52 2012 +0200
+++ b/tools/libxl/libxl_utils.h Fri Jun 01 09:27:17 2012 +0800
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ int libxl_devid_to_device_nic(libxl_ctx
 int libxl_vdev_to_device_disk(libxl_ctx *ctx, uint32_t domid, const char *vdev,
                                libxl_device_disk *disk);

-int libxl_cpumap_alloc(libxl_ctx *ctx, libxl_cpumap *cpumap);
+int libxl_cpumap_alloc(libxl_ctx *ctx, libxl_cpumap *cpumap, int max_cpus);
 int libxl_cpumap_test(libxl_cpumap *cpumap, int cpu);
 void libxl_cpumap_set(libxl_cpumap *cpumap, int cpu);
 void libxl_cpumap_reset(libxl_cpumap *cpumap, int cpu);
diff -r d7318231cfe3 -r 3b0eed731020 tools/libxl/xl_cmdimpl.c
--- a/tools/libxl/xl_cmdimpl.c  Thu May 31 10:18:52 2012 +0200
+++ b/tools/libxl/xl_cmdimpl.c  Fri Jun 01 09:27:17 2012 +0800
@@ -503,7 +503,7 @@ static int vcpupin_parse(char *cpu, libx
         return 0;
     }

-    if (libxl_cpumap_alloc(ctx, &exclude_cpumap)) {
+    if (libxl_cpumap_alloc(ctx, &exclude_cpumap, 0)) {
         fprintf(stderr, "Error: Failed to allocate cpumap.\n");
         return ENOMEM;
     }
@@ -659,7 +659,7 @@ static void parse_config_data(const char
     if (!xlu_cfg_get_list (config, "cpus", &cpus, 0, 1)) {
         int i, n_cpus = 0;

-        if (libxl_cpumap_alloc(ctx, &b_info->cpumap)) {
+        if (libxl_cpumap_alloc(ctx, &b_info->cpumap, 0)) {
             fprintf(stderr, "Unable to allocate cpumap\n");
             exit(1);
         }
@@ -695,7 +695,7 @@ static void parse_config_data(const char
     else if (!xlu_cfg_get_string (config, "cpus", &buf, 0)) {
         char *buf2 = strdup(buf);

-        if (libxl_cpumap_alloc(ctx, &b_info->cpumap)) {
+        if (libxl_cpumap_alloc(ctx, &b_info->cpumap, 0)) {
             fprintf(stderr, "Unable to allocate cpumap\n");
             exit(1);
         }
@@ -1782,7 +1782,9 @@ start:
     if (vcpu_to_pcpu) {
         libxl_cpumap vcpu_cpumap;

-        libxl_cpumap_alloc(ctx, &vcpu_cpumap);
+        ret = libxl_cpumap_alloc(ctx, &vcpu_cpumap, 0);
+        if (ret)
+            goto error_out;
         for (i = 0; i < d_config.b_info.max_vcpus; i++) {

             if (vcpu_to_pcpu[i] != -1) {
@@ -4054,7 +4056,7 @@ static void vcpupin(const char *d, const

     find_domain(d);

-    if (libxl_cpumap_alloc(ctx, &cpumap)) {
+    if (libxl_cpumap_alloc(ctx, &cpumap, 0)) {
         goto vcpupin_out;
     }

@@ -4111,7 +4113,7 @@ static void vcpuset(const char *d, const

     find_domain(d);

-    if (libxl_cpumap_alloc(ctx, &cpumap)) {
+    if (libxl_cpumap_alloc(ctx, &cpumap, 0)) {
         fprintf(stderr, "libxl_cpumap_alloc failed\n");
         return;
     }
@@ -5970,7 +5972,7 @@ int main_cpupoolcreate(int argc, char **
         fprintf(stderr, "libxl_get_freecpus failed\n");
         goto out_cfg;
     }
-    if (libxl_cpumap_alloc(ctx, &cpumap)) {
+    if (libxl_cpumap_alloc(ctx, &cpumap, 0)) {
         fprintf(stderr, "Failed to allocate cpumap\n");
         goto out_cfg;
     }
@@ -6337,7 +6339,7 @@ int main_cpupoolnumasplit(int argc, char
         return -ERROR_FAIL;
     }

-    if (libxl_cpumap_alloc(ctx, &cpumap)) {
+    if (libxl_cpumap_alloc(ctx, &cpumap, 0)) {
         fprintf(stderr, "Failed to allocate cpumap\n");
         libxl_cputopology_list_free(topology, n_cpus);
         return -ERROR_FAIL;

Dario Faggioli

2012-Jun-01 06:26 UTC

head link

Re: [PATCH v2 ]libxl: allow to allocate cpumap with specific size

Hi all,

Sorry, my fault I missed the v1 of this but...

On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 02:41 +0000, Zhang, Yang Z wrote: > Currently, libxl_cpumap_alloc()allocate the cpumap with size of max_cpus.
In some place, we may want to allocate specific size of cpumap.
>... Do we? I fail to see this in the code below (you''re only replacing
libxl_cpumap_alloc calls with new versions _always_ passing 0 as
max_cpus, am I right?)

Dario

-- 
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://retis.sssup.it/people/faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)




_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Ian Campbell

2012-Jun-01 06:30 UTC

head link

Re: [PATCH v2 ]libxl: allow to allocate cpumap with specific size

On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 07:26 +0100, Dario Faggioli wrote:> Hi all,
> 
> Sorry, my fault I missed the v1 of this but...
> 
> On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 02:41 +0000, Zhang, Yang Z wrote: 
> > Currently, libxl_cpumap_alloc()allocate the cpumap with size of
max_cpus. In some place, we may want to allocate specific size of cpumap.
> >
> ... Do we? I fail to see this in the code below (you''re only
replacing
> libxl_cpumap_alloc calls with new versions _always_ passing 0 as
> max_cpus, am I right?)
The change to actually use this is is a followup patch "libxl: allow to
set more than 31 vcpus".

Ian.

Dario Faggioli

2012-Jun-01 06:38 UTC

head link

Re: [PATCH v2 ]libxl: allow to allocate cpumap with specific size

On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 07:30 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > > > Currently, libxl_cpumap_alloc()allocate the cpumap with size of
max_cpus. In some place, we may want to allocate specific size of cpumap.
> > >
> > ... Do we? I fail to see this in the code below (you''re only
replacing
> > libxl_cpumap_alloc calls with new versions _always_ passing 0 as
> > max_cpus, am I right?)
> 
> The change to actually use this is is a followup patch "libxl: allow
to
> set more than 31 vcpus".
> Yep, I saw that and commented on it too... If we go for this, I''d
suggest at least changing the changelog a bit and mention where/why
we''re going to use it.

Dario

-- 
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://retis.sssup.it/people/faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)




_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Xen devel - Jun 2012 - [PATCH v2 ]libxl: allow to allocate cpumap with specific size

[PATCH v2 ]libxl: allow to allocate cpumap with specific size

Re: [PATCH v2 ]libxl: allow to allocate cpumap with specific size

Re: [PATCH v2 ]libxl: allow to allocate cpumap with specific size

Re: [PATCH v2 ]libxl: allow to allocate cpumap with specific size