Jan Beulich
2012-Apr-17 12:58 UTC
[PATCH] x86: suppress warning messages on IO-APIC-less systems
Each call to mp_register_gsi() so far produced two warnings (about not being able to find the corresponding IO-APIC pin). However, we should use the provided information for setting the ELCR correctly (we might want to even do this when there is an IO-APIC, if was absolutely certain that all machines really have this register [and specifically not some other device at the two I/O ports in question]). It is in any case questionable that we allow Dom0 to set this register - it could particularly be the interrupt of a plug-in serial port card that might not work due to this. The problem is that all Dom0 kernels to date do so, hence we can''t simply #GP on such an access (which would be the result if we disallowed access to the port as we should have done from the beginning). Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> --- a/xen/arch/x86/mpparse.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mpparse.c @@ -1034,6 +1034,21 @@ int mp_register_gsi (u32 gsi, int trigge return gsi; #endif + if (!nr_ioapics) { + unsigned int port = 0x4d0 + (gsi >> 3); + u8 val; + + if (!platform_legacy_irq(gsi)) + return -EINVAL; + val = inb(port); + if (triggering) + val |= 1 << (gsi & 7); + else + val &= ~(1 << (gsi & 7)); + outb(val, port); + return 0; + } + ioapic = mp_find_ioapic(gsi); if (ioapic < 0) { printk(KERN_WARNING "No IOAPIC for GSI %u\n", gsi); _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
Keir Fraser
2012-Apr-17 13:09 UTC
Re: [PATCH] x86: suppress warning messages on IO-APIC-less systems
On 17/04/2012 13:58, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:> Each call to mp_register_gsi() so far produced two warnings (about not > being able to find the corresponding IO-APIC pin). > > However, we should use the provided information for setting the ELCR > correctly (we might want to even do this when there is an IO-APIC, if > was absolutely certain that all machines really have this register > [and specifically not some other device at the two I/O ports in > question]). It is in any case questionable that we allow Dom0 to set > this register - it could particularly be the interrupt of a plug-in > serial port card that might not work due to this. The problem is that > all Dom0 kernels to date do so, hence we can''t simply #GP on such an > access (which would be the result if we disallowed access to the port > as we should have done from the beginning). > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>Acked-by: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/mpparse.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mpparse.c > @@ -1034,6 +1034,21 @@ int mp_register_gsi (u32 gsi, int trigge > return gsi; > #endif > > + if (!nr_ioapics) { > + unsigned int port = 0x4d0 + (gsi >> 3); > + u8 val; > + > + if (!platform_legacy_irq(gsi)) > + return -EINVAL; > + val = inb(port); > + if (triggering) > + val |= 1 << (gsi & 7); > + else > + val &= ~(1 << (gsi & 7)); > + outb(val, port); > + return 0; > + } > + > ioapic = mp_find_ioapic(gsi); > if (ioapic < 0) { > printk(KERN_WARNING "No IOAPIC for GSI %u\n", gsi); > > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xen.org > http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel