flight 11807 xen-unstable real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/11807/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-xl-credit2 9 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 11643
test-amd64-i386-xl-win7-amd64 7 windows-install fail REGR. vs. 11643
Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
test-i386-i386-win 14 guest-start.2 fail like 11643
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-pcipt-intel 9 guest-start fail never pass
test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel 11 leak-check/check fail never pass
test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd 11 leak-check/check fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-win7-amd64 13 guest-stop fail never pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-winxpsp3-vcpus1 13 guest-stop fail never pass
test-amd64-i386-win-vcpus1 16 leak-check/check fail never pass
test-amd64-i386-xend-winxpsp3 16 leak-check/check fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-win 13 guest-stop fail never pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-win-vcpus1 13 guest-stop fail never pass
test-i386-i386-xl-win 13 guest-stop fail never pass
test-amd64-i386-win 16 leak-check/check fail never pass
test-i386-i386-xl-winxpsp3 13 guest-stop fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-win 16 leak-check/check fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-winxpsp3 13 guest-stop fail never pass
version targeted for testing:
xen a91aa7a582fb
baseline version:
xen e2722b24dc09
------------------------------------------------------------
People who touched revisions under test:
Adin Scannell <adin@scannell.ca>
Alex Zeffertt <alex.zeffertt@eu.citrix.com>
Andres Lagar-Cavilla <andres@lagarcavilla.org>
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Daniel De Graaf <dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov>
Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
Diego Ongaro <diego.ongaro@citrix.com>
Dietmar Hahn <dietmar.hahn@ts.fujitsu.com>
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Jim Fehlig <jfehlig@suse.com>
juergen.gross@ts.fujitsu.com
Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de>
Paulian Bogdan Marinca <paulian@marinca.net>
Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@entel.upc.edu>
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>
Wei Wang <wei.wang2@amd.com>
------------------------------------------------------------
jobs:
build-amd64 pass
build-i386 pass
build-amd64-oldkern pass
build-i386-oldkern pass
build-amd64-pvops pass
build-i386-pvops pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl pass
test-amd64-i386-xl pass
test-i386-i386-xl pass
test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-win7-amd64 fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-win7-amd64 fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-credit2 fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-pcipt-intel fail
test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-multivcpu pass
test-amd64-amd64-pair pass
test-amd64-i386-pair pass
test-i386-i386-pair pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf-pin pass
test-amd64-amd64-pv pass
test-amd64-i386-pv pass
test-i386-i386-pv pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf pass
test-amd64-i386-win-vcpus1 fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-win-vcpus1 fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-winxpsp3-vcpus1 fail
test-amd64-amd64-win fail
test-amd64-i386-win fail
test-i386-i386-win fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-win fail
test-i386-i386-xl-win fail
test-amd64-i386-xend-winxpsp3 fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-winxpsp3 fail
test-i386-i386-xl-winxpsp3 fail
------------------------------------------------------------
sg-report-flight on woking.cam.xci-test.com
logs: /home/xc_osstest/logs
images: /home/xc_osstest/images
Logs, config files, etc. are available at
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs
Test harness code can be found at
http://xenbits.xensource.com/gitweb?p=osstest.git;a=summary
Not pushing.
(No revision log; it would be 1232 lines long.)
xen.org writes ("[xen-unstable test] 11807: regressions -
FAIL"):> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> including tests which could not be run:
> test-amd64-i386-xl-credit2 9 guest-start fail REGR. vs.
11643
> test-amd64-i386-xl-win7-amd64 7 windows-install fail REGR. vs.
11643
Both of these seem to be high-probability heisenbugs. In both cases
LThe failure seems to be much more likely (perhaps even restricted to)
on certain hosts, and now that my tester is "sticky" when it sees a
fail these will give us more trouble.
For this one> test-amd64-i386-xl-win7-amd64 7 windows-install fail REGR. vs.
11643
the failure mode is that Windows sits waiting at a login screen rather
than logging in the user which is supposed to run the test responder
which was installed with the image. Most likely cause is that it has
stopped making progress for some reason. None of the logs seem
interesting.
This one> test-amd64-i386-xl-credit2 9 guest-start fail REGR. vs.
11643
which occasionally also manifests as various other failures of the
same test run, is this assertion:
Feb 2 02:34:49.293506 (XEN) Assertion ''test_bit(vector,
desc->arch.used_vectors)'' failed at irq.c:670
which I mentioned yesterday. My bisector had a go at the
guest-saverestore test and produced inconclusive results but looking
at the revision graph output I suspect that something between
24612:54000bca7a6a (probably good) and 24620:926e0820d615 (definitely
bad) may be implicated.
Given that this bug seems to be pretty specific to a particular host,
which happens to be a dual-socket six-core AMD Opteron 2427, I''m
wondering whether 24613:04623ceabb72 "amd iommu: disable iommu
emulation on non-iommu systems" might be relevant.
Suggestions for either bug, and offers to debug these, gratefully
received. Failing that we will probably get lucky and get a push
eventually.
Ian.
This patch ought to help narrow down the problem. -- Andrew Cooper - Dom0 Kernel Engineer, Citrix XenServer T: +44 (0)1223 225 900, http://www.citrix.com _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
On 07/02/2012 18:09, "Ian Jackson" <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com> wrote:> Andrew Cooper writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 11807: regressions > - FAIL"): >> This patch ought to help narrow down the problem. > > Thanks. Keir, does this look reasonable to you ?Ah, yes it did. Please apply it. Acked-by: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>> Thanks, > Ian.
Andrew Cooper writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 11807:
regressions - FAIL"):> This patch ought to help narrow down the problem.
Thanks. Keir, does this look reasonable to you ?
Thanks,
Ian.
Keir Fraser writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 11807: regressions
- FAIL"):> On 07/02/2012 18:09, "Ian Jackson"
<Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
> > Thanks. Keir, does this look reasonable to you ?
>
> Ah, yes it did. Please apply it.
>
> Acked-by: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
Thanks, done.
Ian.