Ian Campbell
2012-Jan-25 10:19 UTC
Re: [PATCHv2 1 of 2] libxl: extend pCPUs specification for vcpu-pin.
On Mon, 2012-01-23 at 18:21 +0000, Dario Faggioli wrote:> Allow for "^<cpuid>" syntax while specifying the pCPUs list > during a vcpu-pin. This enables doing the following: > > xl vcpu-pin 1 1 0-4,^2 > > and achieving: > > xl vcpu-list > Name ID VCPU CPU State Time(s) CPU Affinity > ... > Squeeze_pv 1 1 3 -b- 2.4 0-1,3-4 > ... > > Signed-off-by: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com> Is 0-4,^2-3 (== 0-1,4) a useful thing to want to write? I don''t think it should block this patch going in though. Ian.
Maybe Matching Threads
- Re: [PATCHv3 1 of 2] libxl: extend pCPUs specification for vcpu-pin.
- [PATCH v2 0/5] xl: allow for node-wise specification of vcpu pinning
- [PATCH v8] Some automatic NUMA placement documentation
- Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 1/4] libxl: implement NUMA capabilities reporting
- Re: Issue with PCI-passthrough and pvops