From 1e59d2ec2ff93b42c86d18c7cc9432ca2172a795 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Liu Jinsong <jinsong.liu@intel.com> Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 21:06:11 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 10/10] Xen: update pcpu online/offline logic This patch update pcpu online/offline logic. It closes cpu0''s /sys/.../xen_pcpu0/online authority to user. It also simplifies pcpu sync by removing redundant logic. Signed-off-by: Liu, Jinsong <jinsong.liu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jiang, Yunhong <yunhong.jiang@intel.com> --- drivers/xen/pcpu.c | 71 ++++++++++++++-------------------------------------- 1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/xen/pcpu.c b/drivers/xen/pcpu.c index 6d1a770..1d32784 100644 --- a/drivers/xen/pcpu.c +++ b/drivers/xen/pcpu.c @@ -24,7 +24,6 @@ static RAW_NOTIFIER_HEAD(xen_pcpu_chain); struct xen_pcpus { struct list_head list; - int present; }; static struct xen_pcpus xen_pcpus; @@ -189,9 +188,13 @@ static int pcpu_sysdev_init(struct pcpu *cpu) kfree(cpu); return -1; } - sysdev_create_file(&cpu->sysdev, &attr_online); sysdev_create_file(&cpu->sysdev, &attr_apic_id); sysdev_create_file(&cpu->sysdev, &attr_acpi_id); + + /* Not open cpu0 online access to user */ + if (cpu->sysdev.id) + sysdev_create_file(&cpu->sysdev, &attr_online); + return 0; } @@ -239,17 +242,10 @@ static struct pcpu *init_pcpu(struct xenpf_pcpuinfo *info) return pcpu; } -#define PCPU_NO_CHANGE 0 -#define PCPU_ADDED 1 -#define PCPU_ONLINE_OFFLINE 2 -#define PCPU_REMOVED 3 /* * Caller should hold the pcpu lock - * < 0: Something wrong - * 0: No changes - * > 0: State changed */ -static struct pcpu *_sync_pcpu(int cpu_num, int *max_id, int *result) +static int _sync_pcpu(int cpu_num, int *max_id) { struct pcpu *pcpu = NULL; struct xenpf_pcpuinfo *info; @@ -259,14 +255,12 @@ static struct pcpu *_sync_pcpu(int cpu_num, int *max_id, int *result) }; int ret; - *result = -1; - info = &op.u.pcpu_info; info->xen_cpuid = cpu_num; ret = HYPERVISOR_dom0_op(&op); if (ret) - return NULL; + return -1; if (max_id) *max_id = op.u.pcpu_info.max_present; @@ -275,28 +269,24 @@ static struct pcpu *_sync_pcpu(int cpu_num, int *max_id, int *result) if (info->flags & XEN_PCPU_FLAGS_INVALID) { /* The pcpu has been removed */ - *result = PCPU_NO_CHANGE; if (pcpu) { raw_notifier_call_chain(&xen_pcpu_chain, XEN_PCPU_REMOVE, (void *)(long)pcpu->xen_id); xen_pcpu_free(pcpu); - *result = PCPU_REMOVED; } - return NULL; + return 0; } if (!pcpu) { - *result = PCPU_ADDED; pcpu = init_pcpu(info); if (pcpu == NULL) { printk(KERN_WARNING "Failed to init pcpu %x\n", info->xen_cpuid); - *result = -1; + return -1; } } else { - *result = PCPU_NO_CHANGE; /* * Old PCPU is replaced with a new pcpu, this means * several virq is missed, will it happen? @@ -307,10 +297,10 @@ static struct pcpu *_sync_pcpu(int cpu_num, int *max_id, int *result) pcpu->apic_id = info->apic_id; pcpu->acpi_id = info->acpi_id; } - if (xen_pcpu_online_check(info, pcpu)) - *result = PCPU_ONLINE_OFFLINE; + xen_pcpu_online_check(info, pcpu); } - return pcpu; + + return 0; } int xen_pcpu_index(uint32_t id, int is_acpiid) @@ -353,50 +343,27 @@ static int xen_sync_pcpus(void) /* * Boot cpu always have cpu_id 0 in xen */ - int cpu_num = 0, max_id = 0, result = 0, present = 0; + int cpu_num = 0, max_id = 0, ret = 0; struct list_head *elem, *tmp; struct pcpu *pcpu; get_pcpu_lock(); - while ((result >= 0) && (cpu_num <= max_id)) { - pcpu = _sync_pcpu(cpu_num, &max_id, &result); - - printk(KERN_DEBUG "sync cpu %x get result %x max_id %x\n", - cpu_num, result, max_id); - - switch (result) { - case PCPU_NO_CHANGE: - if (pcpu) - present++; - break; - case PCPU_ADDED: - case PCPU_ONLINE_OFFLINE: - present++; - case PCPU_REMOVED: - break; - default: - printk(KERN_WARNING "Failed to sync pcpu %x\n", - cpu_num); - break; - - } + while (!ret && (cpu_num <= max_id)) { + ret = _sync_pcpu(cpu_num, &max_id); cpu_num++; } - if (result < 0) { + if (ret < 0) { list_for_each_safe(elem, tmp, &xen_pcpus.list) { pcpu = list_entry(elem, struct pcpu, pcpu_list); xen_pcpu_free(pcpu); } - present = 0; } - xen_pcpus.present = present; - put_pcpu_lock(); - return 0; + return ret; } static void xen_pcpu_dpc(struct work_struct *work) @@ -436,10 +403,10 @@ static int __init xen_pcpu_init(void) } INIT_LIST_HEAD(&xen_pcpus.list); - xen_pcpus.present = 0; xen_sync_pcpus(); - if (xen_pcpus.present > 0) + + if (!list_empty(&xen_pcpus.list)) err = bind_virq_to_irqhandler(VIRQ_PCPU_STATE, 0, xen_pcpu_interrupt, 0, "pcpu", NULL); if (err < 0) -- 1.6.5.6 _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
From 1e59d2ec2ff93b42c86d18c7cc9432ca2172a795 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Liu Jinsong <jinsong.liu@intel.com> Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 21:06:11 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 10/10] Xen: update pcpu online/offline logic This patch update pcpu online/offline logic. It closes cpu0''s /sys/.../xen_pcpu0/online authority to user. It also simplifies pcpu sync by removing redundant logic. Signed-off-by: Liu, Jinsong <jinsong.liu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jiang, Yunhong <yunhong.jiang@intel.com> --- drivers/xen/pcpu.c | 71 ++++++++++++++-------------------------------------- 1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/xen/pcpu.c b/drivers/xen/pcpu.c index 6d1a770..1d32784 100644 --- a/drivers/xen/pcpu.c +++ b/drivers/xen/pcpu.c @@ -24,7 +24,6 @@ static RAW_NOTIFIER_HEAD(xen_pcpu_chain); struct xen_pcpus { struct list_head list; - int present; }; static struct xen_pcpus xen_pcpus; @@ -189,9 +188,13 @@ static int pcpu_sysdev_init(struct pcpu *cpu) kfree(cpu); return -1; } - sysdev_create_file(&cpu->sysdev, &attr_online); sysdev_create_file(&cpu->sysdev, &attr_apic_id); sysdev_create_file(&cpu->sysdev, &attr_acpi_id); + + /* Not open cpu0 online access to user */ + if (cpu->sysdev.id) + sysdev_create_file(&cpu->sysdev, &attr_online); + return 0; } @@ -239,17 +242,10 @@ static struct pcpu *init_pcpu(struct xenpf_pcpuinfo *info) return pcpu; } -#define PCPU_NO_CHANGE 0 -#define PCPU_ADDED 1 -#define PCPU_ONLINE_OFFLINE 2 -#define PCPU_REMOVED 3 /* * Caller should hold the pcpu lock - * < 0: Something wrong - * 0: No changes - * > 0: State changed */ -static struct pcpu *_sync_pcpu(int cpu_num, int *max_id, int *result) +static int _sync_pcpu(int cpu_num, int *max_id) { struct pcpu *pcpu = NULL; struct xenpf_pcpuinfo *info; @@ -259,14 +255,12 @@ static struct pcpu *_sync_pcpu(int cpu_num, int *max_id, int *result) }; int ret; - *result = -1; - info = &op.u.pcpu_info; info->xen_cpuid = cpu_num; ret = HYPERVISOR_dom0_op(&op); if (ret) - return NULL; + return -1; if (max_id) *max_id = op.u.pcpu_info.max_present; @@ -275,28 +269,24 @@ static struct pcpu *_sync_pcpu(int cpu_num, int *max_id, int *result) if (info->flags & XEN_PCPU_FLAGS_INVALID) { /* The pcpu has been removed */ - *result = PCPU_NO_CHANGE; if (pcpu) { raw_notifier_call_chain(&xen_pcpu_chain, XEN_PCPU_REMOVE, (void *)(long)pcpu->xen_id); xen_pcpu_free(pcpu); - *result = PCPU_REMOVED; } - return NULL; + return 0; } if (!pcpu) { - *result = PCPU_ADDED; pcpu = init_pcpu(info); if (pcpu == NULL) { printk(KERN_WARNING "Failed to init pcpu %x\n", info->xen_cpuid); - *result = -1; + return -1; } } else { - *result = PCPU_NO_CHANGE; /* * Old PCPU is replaced with a new pcpu, this means * several virq is missed, will it happen? @@ -307,10 +297,10 @@ static struct pcpu *_sync_pcpu(int cpu_num, int *max_id, int *result) pcpu->apic_id = info->apic_id; pcpu->acpi_id = info->acpi_id; } - if (xen_pcpu_online_check(info, pcpu)) - *result = PCPU_ONLINE_OFFLINE; + xen_pcpu_online_check(info, pcpu); } - return pcpu; + + return 0; } int xen_pcpu_index(uint32_t id, int is_acpiid) @@ -353,50 +343,27 @@ static int xen_sync_pcpus(void) /* * Boot cpu always have cpu_id 0 in xen */ - int cpu_num = 0, max_id = 0, result = 0, present = 0; + int cpu_num = 0, max_id = 0, ret = 0; struct list_head *elem, *tmp; struct pcpu *pcpu; get_pcpu_lock(); - while ((result >= 0) && (cpu_num <= max_id)) { - pcpu = _sync_pcpu(cpu_num, &max_id, &result); - - printk(KERN_DEBUG "sync cpu %x get result %x max_id %x\n", - cpu_num, result, max_id); - - switch (result) { - case PCPU_NO_CHANGE: - if (pcpu) - present++; - break; - case PCPU_ADDED: - case PCPU_ONLINE_OFFLINE: - present++; - case PCPU_REMOVED: - break; - default: - printk(KERN_WARNING "Failed to sync pcpu %x\n", - cpu_num); - break; - - } + while (!ret && (cpu_num <= max_id)) { + ret = _sync_pcpu(cpu_num, &max_id); cpu_num++; } - if (result < 0) { + if (ret < 0) { list_for_each_safe(elem, tmp, &xen_pcpus.list) { pcpu = list_entry(elem, struct pcpu, pcpu_list); xen_pcpu_free(pcpu); } - present = 0; } - xen_pcpus.present = present; - put_pcpu_lock(); - return 0; + return ret; } static void xen_pcpu_dpc(struct work_struct *work) @@ -436,10 +403,10 @@ static int __init xen_pcpu_init(void) } INIT_LIST_HEAD(&xen_pcpus.list); - xen_pcpus.present = 0; xen_sync_pcpus(); - if (xen_pcpus.present > 0) + + if (!list_empty(&xen_pcpus.list)) err = bind_virq_to_irqhandler(VIRQ_PCPU_STATE, 0, xen_pcpu_interrupt, 0, "pcpu", NULL); if (err < 0) -- 1.6.5.6
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-Dec-23 13:24 UTC
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 10/10] Xen: update pcpu online/offline logic
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 10:32:12AM +0000, Liu, Jinsong wrote:> >From 1e59d2ec2ff93b42c86d18c7cc9432ca2172a795 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Liu Jinsong <jinsong.liu@intel.com> > Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 21:06:11 +0800 > Subject: [PATCH 10/10] Xen: update pcpu online/offline logic > > This patch update pcpu online/offline logic.Roll them in the patch you posted please.> > It closes cpu0''s /sys/.../xen_pcpu0/online authority to user. > It also simplifies pcpu sync by removing redundant logic. > > Signed-off-by: Liu, Jinsong <jinsong.liu@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Jiang, Yunhong <yunhong.jiang@intel.com> > --- > drivers/xen/pcpu.c | 71 ++++++++++++++-------------------------------------- > 1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/xen/pcpu.c b/drivers/xen/pcpu.c > index 6d1a770..1d32784 100644 > --- a/drivers/xen/pcpu.c > +++ b/drivers/xen/pcpu.c > @@ -24,7 +24,6 @@ static RAW_NOTIFIER_HEAD(xen_pcpu_chain); > > struct xen_pcpus { > struct list_head list; > - int present; > }; > static struct xen_pcpus xen_pcpus; > > @@ -189,9 +188,13 @@ static int pcpu_sysdev_init(struct pcpu *cpu) > kfree(cpu); > return -1; > } > - sysdev_create_file(&cpu->sysdev, &attr_online); > sysdev_create_file(&cpu->sysdev, &attr_apic_id); > sysdev_create_file(&cpu->sysdev, &attr_acpi_id); > + > + /* Not open cpu0 online access to user */ > + if (cpu->sysdev.id) > + sysdev_create_file(&cpu->sysdev, &attr_online); > + > return 0; > } > > @@ -239,17 +242,10 @@ static struct pcpu *init_pcpu(struct xenpf_pcpuinfo *info) > return pcpu; > } > > -#define PCPU_NO_CHANGE 0 > -#define PCPU_ADDED 1 > -#define PCPU_ONLINE_OFFLINE 2 > -#define PCPU_REMOVED 3 > /* > * Caller should hold the pcpu lock > - * < 0: Something wrong > - * 0: No changes > - * > 0: State changed > */ > -static struct pcpu *_sync_pcpu(int cpu_num, int *max_id, int *result) > +static int _sync_pcpu(int cpu_num, int *max_id) > { > struct pcpu *pcpu = NULL; > struct xenpf_pcpuinfo *info; > @@ -259,14 +255,12 @@ static struct pcpu *_sync_pcpu(int cpu_num, int *max_id, int *result) > }; > int ret; > > - *result = -1; > - > info = &op.u.pcpu_info; > info->xen_cpuid = cpu_num; > > ret = HYPERVISOR_dom0_op(&op); > if (ret) > - return NULL; > + return -1; > > if (max_id) > *max_id = op.u.pcpu_info.max_present; > @@ -275,28 +269,24 @@ static struct pcpu *_sync_pcpu(int cpu_num, int *max_id, int *result) > > if (info->flags & XEN_PCPU_FLAGS_INVALID) { > /* The pcpu has been removed */ > - *result = PCPU_NO_CHANGE; > if (pcpu) { > raw_notifier_call_chain(&xen_pcpu_chain, > XEN_PCPU_REMOVE, > (void *)(long)pcpu->xen_id); > xen_pcpu_free(pcpu); > - *result = PCPU_REMOVED; > } > - return NULL; > + return 0; > } > > > if (!pcpu) { > - *result = PCPU_ADDED; > pcpu = init_pcpu(info); > if (pcpu == NULL) { > printk(KERN_WARNING "Failed to init pcpu %x\n", > info->xen_cpuid); > - *result = -1; > + return -1; > } > } else { > - *result = PCPU_NO_CHANGE; > /* > * Old PCPU is replaced with a new pcpu, this means > * several virq is missed, will it happen? > @@ -307,10 +297,10 @@ static struct pcpu *_sync_pcpu(int cpu_num, int *max_id, int *result) > pcpu->apic_id = info->apic_id; > pcpu->acpi_id = info->acpi_id; > } > - if (xen_pcpu_online_check(info, pcpu)) > - *result = PCPU_ONLINE_OFFLINE; > + xen_pcpu_online_check(info, pcpu); > } > - return pcpu; > + > + return 0; > } > > int xen_pcpu_index(uint32_t id, int is_acpiid) > @@ -353,50 +343,27 @@ static int xen_sync_pcpus(void) > /* > * Boot cpu always have cpu_id 0 in xen > */ > - int cpu_num = 0, max_id = 0, result = 0, present = 0; > + int cpu_num = 0, max_id = 0, ret = 0; > struct list_head *elem, *tmp; > struct pcpu *pcpu; > > get_pcpu_lock(); > > - while ((result >= 0) && (cpu_num <= max_id)) { > - pcpu = _sync_pcpu(cpu_num, &max_id, &result); > - > - printk(KERN_DEBUG "sync cpu %x get result %x max_id %x\n", > - cpu_num, result, max_id); > - > - switch (result) { > - case PCPU_NO_CHANGE: > - if (pcpu) > - present++; > - break; > - case PCPU_ADDED: > - case PCPU_ONLINE_OFFLINE: > - present++; > - case PCPU_REMOVED: > - break; > - default: > - printk(KERN_WARNING "Failed to sync pcpu %x\n", > - cpu_num); > - break; > - > - } > + while (!ret && (cpu_num <= max_id)) { > + ret = _sync_pcpu(cpu_num, &max_id); > cpu_num++; > } > > - if (result < 0) { > + if (ret < 0) { > list_for_each_safe(elem, tmp, &xen_pcpus.list) { > pcpu = list_entry(elem, struct pcpu, pcpu_list); > xen_pcpu_free(pcpu); > } > - present = 0; > } > > - xen_pcpus.present = present; > - > put_pcpu_lock(); > > - return 0; > + return ret; > } > > static void xen_pcpu_dpc(struct work_struct *work) > @@ -436,10 +403,10 @@ static int __init xen_pcpu_init(void) > } > > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&xen_pcpus.list); > - xen_pcpus.present = 0; > > xen_sync_pcpus(); > - if (xen_pcpus.present > 0) > + > + if (!list_empty(&xen_pcpus.list)) > err = bind_virq_to_irqhandler(VIRQ_PCPU_STATE, > 0, xen_pcpu_interrupt, 0, "pcpu", NULL); > if (err < 0) > -- > 1.6.5.6> _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel