Ian Campbell
2011-Dec-09 12:02 UTC
[PATCH 2 of 2] mini-os: do not wait for pci backend in pcifront_scan
# HG changeset patch # User Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com> # Date 1323432077 0 # Node ID d50241faddf372f2262627b9b2071d2a077e8151 # Parent 9c1b223e152eaaa3861f9b6132590de0b4f6cb7e mini-os: do not wait for pci backend in pcifront_scan This blocks the main thread indefinitely if there is no PCI backend present in xenstore. Even in the case where there are passthrough devices configured libxl creates the stubdom and waits for it to startup _before_ adding the backend. Since the stub domains main thread is blocked before it can write the "running" state to xenstore the toolstack eventually times out and kills everything. There is already a separate pcifront thread which waits for the backend to appear and calls init_pcifront at the appropriate time should a backend ever appear. Unfortunately I don''t have any free test boxes with VT-d so I haven''t been able to test the cases where PCI deivces are passed through but I obviously have tested that I can now start an HVM domain with stub qemu without PCI devices passed through which I couldn''t do before so this is an improvement. This stuff is a bit like pushing the lump around the carpet :-/ Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com> diff -r 9c1b223e152e -r d50241faddf3 extras/mini-os/kernel.c --- a/extras/mini-os/kernel.c Fri Dec 09 12:01:16 2011 +0000 +++ b/extras/mini-os/kernel.c Fri Dec 09 12:01:17 2011 +0000 @@ -448,6 +448,7 @@ static void print_pcidev(unsigned int do static void pcifront_thread(void *p) { + pcifront_watches(NULL); pci_dev = init_pcifront(NULL); if (!pci_dev) return; diff -r 9c1b223e152e -r d50241faddf3 extras/mini-os/pcifront.c --- a/extras/mini-os/pcifront.c Fri Dec 09 12:01:16 2011 +0000 +++ b/extras/mini-os/pcifront.c Fri Dec 09 12:01:17 2011 +0000 @@ -280,23 +280,14 @@ void pcifront_scan(struct pcifront_dev * { char *path; int i, n, len; - char *s, *msg = NULL, *err = NULL; + char *s, *msg = NULL; unsigned int domain, bus, slot, fun; if (!dev) dev = pcidev; if (!dev) { - xenbus_event_queue events = NULL; - char *fe_state = "device/pci/0/state"; - xenbus_watch_path_token(XBT_NIL, fe_state, fe_state, &events); - while ((err = xenbus_read(XBT_NIL, fe_state, &msg)) != NULL || msg[0] != ''4'') { - free(msg); - free(err); - printk("pcifront_scan: waiting for pcifront to become ready\n"); - xenbus_wait_for_watch(&events); - } - xenbus_unwatch_path_token(XBT_NIL, fe_state, fe_state); - dev = pcidev; + printk("pcifront_scan: device or bus\n"); + return; } len = strlen(dev->backend) + 1 + 5 + 10 + 1;
Ian Jackson
2011-Dec-09 16:56 UTC
Re: [PATCH 2 of 2] mini-os: do not wait for pci backend in pcifront_scan
Ian Campbell writes ("[PATCH 2 of 2] mini-os: do not wait for pci backend in pcifront_scan"):> Even in the case where there are passthrough devices configured libxl creates > the stubdom and waits for it to startup _before_ adding the backend. Since the > stub domains main thread is blocked before it can write the "running" state to > xenstore the toolstack eventually times out and kills everything. > > There is already a separate pcifront thread which waits for the backend to > appear and calls init_pcifront at the appropriate time should a backend ever > appear. > > Unfortunately I don''t have any free test boxes with VT-d so I > haven''t been able to test the cases where PCI deivces are passed > through but I obviously have tested that I can now start an HVM > domain with stub qemu without PCI devices passed through which I > couldn''t do before so this is an improvement. This stuff is a bit > like pushing the lump around the carpet :-/Right. The worry would be, surely, that this somehow breaks by unpausing the guest before everything has been set up by the stubdom. But I''m happy to ack this patch on the basis that it seemed to improve things for you and should be harmless for the non-stubdom case. Acked-by: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com> (Not applying it yet as the patch floodgate is still closed pending a test pass.) Ian.
Ian Campbell
2011-Dec-09 17:01 UTC
Re: [PATCH 2 of 2] mini-os: do not wait for pci backend in pcifront_scan
On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 16:56 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:> Ian Campbell writes ("[PATCH 2 of 2] mini-os: do not wait for pci backend in pcifront_scan"): > > Even in the case where there are passthrough devices configured libxl creates > > the stubdom and waits for it to startup _before_ adding the backend. Since the > > stub domains main thread is blocked before it can write the "running" state to > > xenstore the toolstack eventually times out and kills everything. > > > > There is already a separate pcifront thread which waits for the backend to > > appear and calls init_pcifront at the appropriate time should a backend ever > > appear. > > > > Unfortunately I don''t have any free test boxes with VT-d so I > > haven''t been able to test the cases where PCI deivces are passed > > through but I obviously have tested that I can now start an HVM > > domain with stub qemu without PCI devices passed through which I > > couldn''t do before so this is an improvement. This stuff is a bit > > like pushing the lump around the carpet :-/ > > Right. The worry would be, surely, that this somehow breaks by > unpausing the guest before everything has been set up by the stubdom.Yes. I was a bit unclear how this ever worked though... We could potentially add something to libxl__create_pci_backend which interlocks against the stubdom pcifront but without a system with an IOMMU I''m not really in a position to test such a patch.> But I''m happy to ack this patch on the basis that it seemed to improve > things for you and should be harmless for the non-stubdom case.Thanks.> Acked-by: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com> > > (Not applying it yet as the patch floodgate is still closed pending a > test pass.)Sure. Ian.