Jean Guyader
2011-Nov-07 19:25 UTC
[Xen-devel] [PATCH] mm: Cleanup, use PAGE_ORDER_4K as page_order instead of "0".
Signed-off-by: Jean Guyader <jean.guyader@eu.citrix.com> --- xen/arch/x86/mm.c | 10 +++++----- xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------ xen/common/memory.c | 8 ++++---- 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Keir Fraser
2011-Nov-07 21:59 UTC
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] mm: Cleanup, use PAGE_ORDER_4K as page_order instead of "0".
Personally I prefer it as zero. Tim can have final decision though. -- Keir On 07/11/2011 19:25, "Jean Guyader" <jean.guyader@eu.citrix.com> wrote:> Signed-off-by: Jean Guyader <jean.guyader@eu.citrix.com> > --- > xen/arch/x86/mm.c | 10 +++++----- > xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------ > xen/common/memory.c | 8 ++++---- > 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Tim Deegan
2011-Nov-08 13:04 UTC
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] mm: Cleanup, use PAGE_ORDER_4K as page_order instead of "0".
At 21:59 +0000 on 07 Nov (1320703190), Keir Fraser wrote:> Personally I prefer it as zero. Tim can have final decision though. >Since we have given them names, I think it''s best to use them everywhere. Applied, thanks. Tim. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel