xen.org
2011-Aug-03 20:37 UTC
[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 8289: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED
flight 8289 xen-unstable real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/8289/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking, including regressions (tests previously passed) regarded as allowable: test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel 9 guest-start.2 fail never pass test-amd64-amd64-xl-pcipt-intel 9 guest-start fail never pass test-i386-i386-xl 5 xen-boot fail like 8240 test-amd64-i386-xl 5 xen-boot fail like 8244 test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd 5 xen-boot fail like 8236 test-amd64-amd64-pv 5 xen-boot fail like 8244 test-amd64-amd64-xl 5 xen-boot fail like 8249 test-amd64-i386-win 5 xen-boot fail like 8256 test-amd64-amd64-win 16 leak-check/check fail never pass test-amd64-i386-win-vcpus1 16 leak-check/check fail never pass test-i386-i386-win 16 leak-check/check fail never pass test-amd64-amd64-pair 8 xen-boot/dst_host fail like 8256 test-amd64-amd64-pair 7 xen-boot/src_host fail like 8256 test-amd64-i386-xl-credit2 5 xen-boot fail like 8249 test-i386-i386-pair 7 xen-boot/src_host fail like 8256 test-i386-i386-pair 8 xen-boot/dst_host fail like 8256 test-amd64-i386-xl-win-vcpus1 13 guest-stop fail never pass test-amd64-amd64-xl-win 5 xen-boot fail like 8249 test-i386-i386-xl-win 5 xen-boot fail like 8256 version targeted for testing: xen fa4e2ca9ecff baseline version: xen 42edf1481c57 ------------------------------------------------------------ People who touched revisions under test: Bei Guan <gbtju85@gmail.com> George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com> Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com> Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com> Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com> Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org> Liu, Jinsong <jinsong.liu@intel.com> Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de> Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@entel.upc.edu> Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@citrix.com> ------------------------------------------------------------ jobs: build-amd64 pass build-i386 pass build-amd64-oldkern pass build-i386-oldkern pass build-amd64-pvops pass build-i386-pvops pass test-amd64-amd64-xl fail test-amd64-i386-xl fail test-i386-i386-xl fail test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd fail test-amd64-i386-xl-credit2 fail test-amd64-amd64-xl-pcipt-intel fail test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel fail test-amd64-i386-xl-multivcpu pass test-amd64-amd64-pair fail test-amd64-i386-pair pass test-i386-i386-pair fail test-amd64-amd64-pv fail test-amd64-i386-pv pass test-i386-i386-pv pass test-amd64-i386-win-vcpus1 fail test-amd64-i386-xl-win-vcpus1 fail test-amd64-amd64-win fail test-amd64-i386-win fail test-i386-i386-win fail test-amd64-amd64-xl-win fail test-i386-i386-xl-win fail ------------------------------------------------------------ sg-report-flight on woking.cam.xci-test.com logs: /home/xc_osstest/logs images: /home/xc_osstest/images Logs, config files, etc. are available at http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs Test harness code can be found at http://xenbits.xensource.com/gitweb?p=osstest.git;a=summary Pushing revision : + branch=xen-unstable + revision=fa4e2ca9ecff + . cri-lock-repos ++ . cri-common +++ umask 002 +++ getconfig Repos +++ perl -e '' use Osstest; readconfigonly(); print $c{Repos} or die $!; '' ++ repos=/export/home/osstest/repos ++ repos_lock=/export/home/osstest/repos/lock ++ ''['' x ''!='' x/export/home/osstest/repos/lock '']'' ++ OSSTEST_REPOS_LOCK_LOCKED=/export/home/osstest/repos/lock ++ exec with-lock-ex -w /export/home/osstest/repos/lock ./ap-push xen-unstable fa4e2ca9ecff + branch=xen-unstable + revision=fa4e2ca9ecff + . cri-lock-repos ++ . cri-common +++ umask 002 +++ getconfig Repos +++ perl -e '' use Osstest; readconfigonly(); print $c{Repos} or die $!; '' ++ repos=/export/home/osstest/repos ++ repos_lock=/export/home/osstest/repos/lock ++ ''['' x/export/home/osstest/repos/lock ''!='' x/export/home/osstest/repos/lock '']'' + : xen@xenbits.xensource.com + : xen@xenbits.xensource.com:git/linux-pvops + : master + : tested/2.6.39.x + case "$branch" in + cd /export/home/osstest/repos/xen-unstable.hg + hg push -r fa4e2ca9ecff ssh://xen@xenbits.xensource.com/HG/xen-unstable.hg pushing to ssh://xen@xenbits.xensource.com/HG/xen-unstable.hg searching for changes remote: adding changesets remote: adding manifests remote: adding file changes remote: added 20 changesets with 62 changes to 47 files _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Ian Jackson
2011-Aug-08 15:04 UTC
Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 8289: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED
xen.org writes ("[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 8289: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED"):> test-amd64-i386-xl 5 xen-boot fail like 8244This is not a heisenbug. It is a reproducible failure to boot on certain hardware. It just looks like a heisenbug to the tester because it doesn''t runs the test on the same host each time. It passes on earwig, gall-mite, itch-mite All of which are Intel machines It fails on leaf-beetle, potato-beetle, woodlouse All of which are AMD machines Here is an example of a failure: http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/8289/test-amd64-i386-xl/info.html The serial log just stops after this: Aug 3 19:40:02.917190 (XEN) Processor #21 0:8 APIC version 16 Aug 3 19:40:02.924192 (XEN) ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0xff] dfl dfl lint[0x1]) Aug 3 19:40:02.932202 (XEN) ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x01] high edge lint[0x1]) Aug 3 19:40:02.940214 (XEN) Overriding APIC driver with bigsmp Aug 3 19:40:02.940234 (XEN) ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x16] address[0xfec00000] gsi_base[0]) Aug 3 19:40:02.948192 (XEN) IOAPIC[0]: apic_id 22, version 17, address 0xfec00000, GSI 0-15 Aug 3 19:40:02.957194 (XEN) ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x17] address[0xfec01000] gsi_base[16]) Aug 3 19:40:02.968200 (XEN) IOAPIC[1]: apic_id 23, version 17, address 0xfec01000, GSI 16-31 Aug 3 19:40:02.976203 (XEN) ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x18] address[0xfec02000] gsi_base[32]) Aug 3 19:40:02.977192 (XEN) IOAPIC[2]: apic_id 24, version 17, address 0xfec02000, GSI 32-47 Aug 3 19:40:02.985195 (XEN) ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 0 global_irq 2 dfl dfl) Aug 3 19:40:02.996197 (XEN) ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 9 global_irq 9 low level) Aug 3 19:40:03.001201 (XEN) ACPI: IRQ0 used by override. Aug 3 19:40:03.005185 (XEN) ACPI: IRQ2 used by override. Aug 3 19:40:03.012196 (XEN) ACPI: IRQ9 used by override. Aug 3 19:40:03.013185 (XEN) Enabling APIC mode: Phys. Using 3 I/O APICs Aug 3 19:40:03.021188 (XEN) ACPI: HPET id: 0x1166a201 base: 0xfed00000 The test runner''s attempt to get debug key output (which start at 19:45:12) didn''t succeed. Results on other machines are similar. Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Keir Fraser
2011-Aug-08 15:35 UTC
Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 8289: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED
On 08/08/2011 16:04, "Ian Jackson" <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com> wrote:> xen.org writes ("[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 8289: tolerable FAIL - > PUSHED"): >> test-amd64-i386-xl 5 xen-boot fail like 8244 > > This is not a heisenbug. It is a reproducible failure to boot on > certain hardware. It just looks like a heisenbug to the tester > because it doesn''t runs the test on the same host each time. > > It passes on > earwig, gall-mite, itch-mite All of which are Intel machines > It fails on > leaf-beetle, potato-beetle, woodlouse All of which are AMD machinesCan you set up a bisection run on one of the AMD boxes? -- Keir> Here is an example of a failure: > > http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/8289/test-amd64-i386-xl/info. > html > > The serial log just stops after this: > > Aug 3 19:40:02.917190 (XEN) Processor #21 0:8 APIC version 16 > Aug 3 19:40:02.924192 (XEN) ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0xff] dfl dfl lint[0x1]) > Aug 3 19:40:02.932202 (XEN) ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x01] high edge > lint[0x1]) > Aug 3 19:40:02.940214 (XEN) Overriding APIC driver with bigsmp > Aug 3 19:40:02.940234 (XEN) ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x16] address[0xfec00000] > gsi_base[0]) > Aug 3 19:40:02.948192 (XEN) IOAPIC[0]: apic_id 22, version 17, address > 0xfec00000, GSI 0-15 > Aug 3 19:40:02.957194 (XEN) ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x17] address[0xfec01000] > gsi_base[16]) > Aug 3 19:40:02.968200 (XEN) IOAPIC[1]: apic_id 23, version 17, address > 0xfec01000, GSI 16-31 > Aug 3 19:40:02.976203 (XEN) ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x18] address[0xfec02000] > gsi_base[32]) > Aug 3 19:40:02.977192 (XEN) IOAPIC[2]: apic_id 24, version 17, address > 0xfec02000, GSI 32-47 > Aug 3 19:40:02.985195 (XEN) ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 0 global_irq 2 > dfl dfl) > Aug 3 19:40:02.996197 (XEN) ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 9 global_irq 9 > low level) > Aug 3 19:40:03.001201 (XEN) ACPI: IRQ0 used by override. > Aug 3 19:40:03.005185 (XEN) ACPI: IRQ2 used by override. > Aug 3 19:40:03.012196 (XEN) ACPI: IRQ9 used by override. > Aug 3 19:40:03.013185 (XEN) Enabling APIC mode: Phys. Using 3 I/O APICs > Aug 3 19:40:03.021188 (XEN) ACPI: HPET id: 0x1166a201 base: 0xfed00000 > > The test runner''s attempt to get debug key output (which start at > 19:45:12) didn''t succeed. Results on other machines are similar. > > Ian. > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Ian Jackson
2011-Aug-08 16:35 UTC
Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 8289: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED
Keir Fraser writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 8289: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED"):> On 08/08/2011 16:04, "Ian Jackson" <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com> wrote: > > It fails on > > leaf-beetle, potato-beetle, woodlouse All of which are AMD machines > > Can you set up a bisection run on one of the AMD boxes?I think I have one running. Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel