On 08/06/2011 11:52, Lars Kurth wrote:> See
> http://blog.xen.org/index.php/2011/06/07/xen-governance-proposal-accepted/
Been asked to post the text of the blog post: here we go (-:
----------------------------------------
You may remember the Community vote on the Xen Governance Proposal
<http://blog.xen.org/index.php/2011/05/11/xen-org-project-governance-proposal/>:
well the deadline for the vote passed a few minutes ago and I closed the
vote. There was almost unanimous for the proposal
<http://www.xen.org/files/Proposals/XenGovernanceProposal1.pdf>:
* 92% in favor
* 8% abstained
I also got some constructive and encouraging feedback such as:
* I strongly agree with all of the points outlined in this proposal.
The controls outlined should bring transparency to the process of
Xen development whilst not endangering the current unwritten code.
* Good proposal, but could benefit from defining the role of the
sponsor and mentor better and by clarifying their role during
phases in the project lifecycle.
* Clarify the scope of voting, i.e. when are votes local to a
project and when not
As next step, I will update the document, share it and I will start
engaging with project leads to agree how to migrate to their projects to
the new process. Following that, the xen.org site structure will be
changed around the concepts of mature, active and archived projects.
----------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel