Jan Beulich
2011-Mar-11 15:34 UTC
[Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/4] x86/HPET: use dynamic allocation for hpet_events[]
Typically there are far less than 32 counters available, and hence there''s no use in wasting the memory on (almost) every system. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com> --- 2011-03-09.orig/xen/arch/x86/hpet.c +++ 2011-03-09/xen/arch/x86/hpet.c @@ -21,8 +21,6 @@ #define MAX_DELTA_NS MILLISECS(10*1000) #define MIN_DELTA_NS MICROSECS(20) -#define MAX_HPET_NUM 32 - #define HPET_EVT_USED_BIT 0 #define HPET_EVT_USED (1 << HPET_EVT_USED_BIT) #define HPET_EVT_DISABLE_BIT 1 @@ -56,8 +54,7 @@ struct hpet_event_channel int irq; /* msi irq */ unsigned int flags; /* HPET_EVT_x */ } __cacheline_aligned; -static struct hpet_event_channel hpet_events[MAX_HPET_NUM] = - { [0 ... MAX_HPET_NUM-1].irq = -1 }; +static struct hpet_event_channel *__read_mostly hpet_events; /* msi hpet channels used for broadcast */ static unsigned int __read_mostly num_hpets_used; @@ -426,6 +423,11 @@ static int __init hpet_fsb_cap_lookup(vo num_chs = ((id & HPET_ID_NUMBER) >> HPET_ID_NUMBER_SHIFT); num_chs++; /* Value read out starts from 0 */ + hpet_events = xmalloc_array(struct hpet_event_channel, num_chs); + if ( !hpet_events ) + return 0; + memset(hpet_events, 0, num_chs * sizeof(*hpet_events)); + num_chs_used = 0; for ( i = 0; i < num_chs; i++ ) { @@ -585,10 +587,16 @@ void __init hpet_broadcast_init(void) if ( !(hpet_id & HPET_ID_LEGSUP) ) return; + if ( !hpet_events ) + hpet_events = xmalloc(struct hpet_event_channel); + if ( !hpet_events ) + return; + memset(hpet_events, 0, sizeof(*hpet_events)); + hpet_events->irq = -1; + /* Start HPET legacy interrupts */ cfg |= HPET_CFG_LEGACY; n = 1; - hpet_events->idx = 0; if ( !force_hpet_broadcast ) pv_rtc_handler = handle_rtc_once; @@ -627,6 +635,9 @@ void hpet_broadcast_resume(void) u32 cfg; unsigned int i, n; + if ( !hpet_events ) + return; + hpet_resume(); cfg = hpet_read32(HPET_CFG); @@ -668,7 +679,7 @@ void hpet_disable_legacy_broadcast(void) u32 cfg; unsigned long flags; - if ( !(hpet_events->flags & HPET_EVT_LEGACY) ) + if ( !hpet_events || !(hpet_events->flags & HPET_EVT_LEGACY) ) return; spin_lock_irqsave(&hpet_events->lock, flags); @@ -751,7 +762,7 @@ void hpet_broadcast_exit(void) int hpet_broadcast_is_available(void) { - return ((hpet_events->flags & HPET_EVT_LEGACY) + return ((hpet_events && (hpet_events->flags & HPET_EVT_LEGACY)) || num_hpets_used > 0); } @@ -759,7 +770,8 @@ int hpet_legacy_irq_tick(void) { this_cpu(irq_count)--; - if ( (hpet_events->flags & (HPET_EVT_DISABLE|HPET_EVT_LEGACY)) !+ if ( !hpet_events || + (hpet_events->flags & (HPET_EVT_DISABLE|HPET_EVT_LEGACY)) ! HPET_EVT_LEGACY ) return 0; hpet_events->event_handler(hpet_events); _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Wei, Gang
2011-Mar-12 11:05 UTC
[Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH 3/4] x86/HPET: use dynamic allocation for hpet_events[]
Jan Beulich wrote onĀ 2011-03-11:> Typically there are far less than 32 counters available, and hence > there''s no use in wasting the memory on (almost) every system. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>Acked-by: Wei Gang <gang.wei@intel.com> Jimmy _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel