Xen devel - Feb 2011 - tap vs tap2 (libxl & xend)

Is there a reason behind libxl not accepting tap2:.. disk format, while xend
seems to? I know the latter is being phased out slowly, but IIRC, with 4.0.1, we
moved to tap2 addressing explicitly.

Shriram
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

On Wed, 16 Feb 2011, Shriram Rajagopalan wrote:
> Is there a reason behind libxl not accepting tap2:.. disk format, while
xend seems to? I know the latter is being phased out slowly, but IIRC, with
4.0.1, we moved to tap2 addressing explicitly.
> 
Apart from the fact the the tap2 syntax doesn''t make any sense, xl
should provide VM config compatibility so it should support the tap2:
syntax. Kamala sent a patch for that yesterday.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel