Keir, George, it in particular doesn''t do what its title says: "Remove lock in ept_get_entry, ..." - the last two hunks are simply missing compared to -unstable c/s 22526 (I have no cluse how that happened). Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
On 02/02/2011 10:04, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@novell.com> wrote:> Keir, George, > > it in particular doesn''t do what its title says: "Remove lock in > ept_get_entry, ..." - the last two hunks are simply missing compared > to -unstable c/s 22526 (I have no cluse how that happened).The xen-unstable and xen-4.0-testing patches are merely plucked by me from postings by George from the following xen-devel thread: http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2010-12/msg00830.html He owns this stuff. -- Keir> Jan >_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>>> On 06.02.11 at 18:08, Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org> wrote: > On 02/02/2011 10:04, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@novell.com> wrote: > >> Keir, George, >> >> it in particular doesn''t do what its title says: "Remove lock in >> ept_get_entry, ..." - the last two hunks are simply missing compared >> to -unstable c/s 22526 (I have no cluse how that happened). > > The xen-unstable and xen-4.0-testing patches are merely plucked by me from > postings by George from the following xen-devel thread: > > http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2010-12/msg00830.htmlAh, okay - I think the patch there wasn''t against 4.0-testing, but against plain 4.0.x, so it''s missing the revert of 4.0-testing c/s 21334. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 07:45 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:> > The xen-unstable and xen-4.0-testing patches are merely plucked by me from > > postings by George from the following xen-devel thread: > > > > http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2010-12/msg00830.html > > Ah, okay - I think the patch there wasn''t against 4.0-testing, but > against plain 4.0.x, so it''s missing the revert of 4.0-testing c/s > 21334.Right -- I''m not exactly sure why that bit was left off my 4.0 patch, but it certainly shouldn''t have been. Keir, can you please apply the attached patch to 4.0-testing. -George _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Possibly Parallel Threads
- E5606 with no HVM; Assertion 'i == 1' failed at p2m-ept.c:524
- Need help with fixing the Xen waitqueue feature
- [PATCH] ept: Fix bug in changeset 22526:7a5ee3800417
- [PATCH 0 of 4 RFC] Populate-on-demand: Check pages being returned by the balloon driver
- Darwine stopped working