flight 5508 xen-unstable real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/5508/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking:
test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-pair 16 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 5503
Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking):
test-i386-xcpkern-i386-pair 8 xen-boot/dst_host fail pass in 5506
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking,
including regressions (tests previously passed) regarded as allowable:
test-amd64-amd64-win 16 leak-check/check fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-win 7 windows-install fail never pass
test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd 8 guest-saverestore fail never pass
test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel 8 guest-saverestore fail never pass
test-amd64-i386-win-vcpus1 16 leak-check/check fail never pass
test-amd64-i386-win 16 leak-check/check fail never pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-win-vcpus1 7 windows-install fail never pass
test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-rhel6hvm-amd 8 guest-saverestore fail never pass
test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-rhel6hvm-intel 8 guest-saverestore fail never pass
test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-win 16 leak-check/check fail never pass
test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-xl-win 7 windows-install fail never pass
test-i386-i386-win 5 xen-boot fail like 5503
test-i386-i386-xl-win 5 xen-boot fail like 5503
test-i386-xcpkern-i386-win 16 leak-check/check fail never pass
version targeted for testing:
xen a69965e61ae9
baseline version:
xen 52e928af3637
------------------------------------------------------------
People who touched revisions under test:
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@eu.citrix.com>
Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>
------------------------------------------------------------
jobs:
build-i386-xcpkern pass
build-amd64 pass
build-i386 pass
build-amd64-oldkern pass
build-i386-oldkern pass
build-amd64-pvops pass
build-i386-pvops pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl pass
test-amd64-i386-xl pass
test-i386-i386-xl pass
test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-xl pass
test-i386-xcpkern-i386-xl pass
test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd fail
test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-rhel6hvm-amd fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-credit2 pass
test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-xl-credit2 pass
test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel fail
test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-rhel6hvm-intel fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-multivcpu pass
test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-xl-multivcpu pass
test-amd64-amd64-pair pass
test-amd64-i386-pair pass
test-i386-i386-pair pass
test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-pair fail
test-i386-xcpkern-i386-pair fail
test-amd64-amd64-pv pass
test-amd64-i386-pv pass
test-i386-i386-pv pass
test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-pv pass
test-i386-xcpkern-i386-pv pass
test-amd64-i386-win-vcpus1 fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-win-vcpus1 fail
test-amd64-amd64-win fail
test-amd64-i386-win fail
test-i386-i386-win fail
test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-win fail
test-i386-xcpkern-i386-win fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-win fail
test-i386-i386-xl-win fail
test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-xl-win fail
------------------------------------------------------------
sg-report-flight on woking.cam.xci-test.com
logs: /home/xc_osstest/logs
images: /home/xc_osstest/images
Logs, config files, etc. are available at
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs
Test harness code can be found at
http://xenbits.xensource.com/gitweb?p=osstest.git;a=summary
Not pushing.
------------------------------------------------------------
changeset: 22849:a69965e61ae9
tag: tip
user: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
date: Mon Jan 31 17:47:24 2011 +0000
Added signature for changeset e7b31cc0093c
changeset: 22848:a0a8a15f0b01
user: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
date: Mon Jan 31 17:47:13 2011 +0000
Added tag 4.1.0-rc3 for changeset e7b31cc0093c
changeset: 22847:e7b31cc0093c
tag: 4.1.0-rc3
user: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
date: Mon Jan 31 17:46:55 2011 +0000
Update QEMU_TAG to xen-4.1.0-rc3
changeset: 22846:52e928af3637
user: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
date: Fri Jan 28 19:37:49 2011 +0000
libxc: Do not use dom0 physmem as parameter to lzma decoder
It''s not clear why a userspace lzma decode would want to use that
particular value, what bearing it has on anything or why it would
assume it could use 1/3 of the total RAM in the system (potentially
quite a large amount of RAM) as opposed to any other limit number.
Instead, hardcode 32Mby.
This reverts 22830:c80960244942, removes the xc_get_physmem/physmem
function entirely, and replaces the expression at the call site with a
fixed constant.
Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Acked-by: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@amd.com>
Committed-by: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>
(qemu changes not included)
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
George Dunlap
2011-Feb-01 14:22 UTC
Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 5508: regressions - FAIL
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 10:11 AM, xen.org <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com> wrote:> flight 5508 xen-unstable real [real] > http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/5508/ > > Regressions :-( > > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking: > test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-pair 16 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 5503The guest started but failed to find it rootfs; this sounds like the intermittent xcpkern failure we mentioned before. It''s a bit hard to look at exactly what might be failing, because the successful runs actualy don''t include any guest console logs! So I can''t compare a successful boot with an unsuccessful one and see where it went wrong. -George> > Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking): > test-i386-xcpkern-i386-pair 8 xen-boot/dst_host fail pass in 5506 > > Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking, > including regressions (tests previously passed) regarded as allowable: > test-amd64-amd64-win 16 leak-check/check fail never pass > test-amd64-amd64-xl-win 7 windows-install fail never pass > test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd 8 guest-saverestore fail never pass > test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel 8 guest-saverestore fail never pass > test-amd64-i386-win-vcpus1 16 leak-check/check fail never pass > test-amd64-i386-win 16 leak-check/check fail never pass > test-amd64-i386-xl-win-vcpus1 7 windows-install fail never pass > test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-rhel6hvm-amd 8 guest-saverestore fail never pass > test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-rhel6hvm-intel 8 guest-saverestore fail never pass > test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-win 16 leak-check/check fail never pass > test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-xl-win 7 windows-install fail never pass > test-i386-i386-win 5 xen-boot fail like 5503 > test-i386-i386-xl-win 5 xen-boot fail like 5503 > test-i386-xcpkern-i386-win 16 leak-check/check fail never pass > > version targeted for testing: > xen a69965e61ae9 > baseline version: > xen 52e928af3637 > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > People who touched revisions under test: > Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@eu.citrix.com> > Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com> > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > jobs: > build-i386-xcpkern pass > build-amd64 pass > build-i386 pass > build-amd64-oldkern pass > build-i386-oldkern pass > build-amd64-pvops pass > build-i386-pvops pass > test-amd64-amd64-xl pass > test-amd64-i386-xl pass > test-i386-i386-xl pass > test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-xl pass > test-i386-xcpkern-i386-xl pass > test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd fail > test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-rhel6hvm-amd fail > test-amd64-i386-xl-credit2 pass > test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-xl-credit2 pass > test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel fail > test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-rhel6hvm-intel fail > test-amd64-i386-xl-multivcpu pass > test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-xl-multivcpu pass > test-amd64-amd64-pair pass > test-amd64-i386-pair pass > test-i386-i386-pair pass > test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-pair fail > test-i386-xcpkern-i386-pair fail > test-amd64-amd64-pv pass > test-amd64-i386-pv pass > test-i386-i386-pv pass > test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-pv pass > test-i386-xcpkern-i386-pv pass > test-amd64-i386-win-vcpus1 fail > test-amd64-i386-xl-win-vcpus1 fail > test-amd64-amd64-win fail > test-amd64-i386-win fail > test-i386-i386-win fail > test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-win fail > test-i386-xcpkern-i386-win fail > test-amd64-amd64-xl-win fail > test-i386-i386-xl-win fail > test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-xl-win fail > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > sg-report-flight on woking.cam.xci-test.com > logs: /home/xc_osstest/logs > images: /home/xc_osstest/images > > Logs, config files, etc. are available at > http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs > > Test harness code can be found at > http://xenbits.xensource.com/gitweb?p=osstest.git;a=summary > > > Not pushing. > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > changeset: 22849:a69965e61ae9 > tag: tip > user: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com> > date: Mon Jan 31 17:47:24 2011 +0000 > > Added signature for changeset e7b31cc0093c > > > changeset: 22848:a0a8a15f0b01 > user: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com> > date: Mon Jan 31 17:47:13 2011 +0000 > > Added tag 4.1.0-rc3 for changeset e7b31cc0093c > > > changeset: 22847:e7b31cc0093c > tag: 4.1.0-rc3 > user: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com> > date: Mon Jan 31 17:46:55 2011 +0000 > > Update QEMU_TAG to xen-4.1.0-rc3 > > > changeset: 22846:52e928af3637 > user: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com> > date: Fri Jan 28 19:37:49 2011 +0000 > > libxc: Do not use dom0 physmem as parameter to lzma decoder > > It''s not clear why a userspace lzma decode would want to use that > particular value, what bearing it has on anything or why it would > assume it could use 1/3 of the total RAM in the system (potentially > quite a large amount of RAM) as opposed to any other limit number. > > Instead, hardcode 32Mby. > > This reverts 22830:c80960244942, removes the xc_get_physmem/physmem > function entirely, and replaces the expression at the call site with a > fixed constant. > > Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com> > Acked-by: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@eu.citrix.com> > Cc: Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@amd.com> > Committed-by: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com> > > > (qemu changes not included) > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel >_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Ian Jackson
2011-Feb-01 14:38 UTC
Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 5508: regressions - FAIL
George Dunlap writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 5508:
regressions - FAIL"):> On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 10:11 AM, xen.org <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>
wrote:
> > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking:
> > test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-pair 16 guest-start fail REGR.
vs. 5503
>
> The guest started but failed to find it rootfs; this sounds like the
> intermittent xcpkern failure we mentioned before.
Yes.
> It''s a bit hard to look at exactly what might be failing, because
the
> successful runs actualy don''t include any guest console logs! So
I
> can''t compare a successful boot with an unsuccessful one and see
where
> it went wrong.
test-amd64-i386-pair passed and does contain guest console logs:
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/5508/test-amd64-i386-pair/leaf-beetle---var-log-xen-console-guest-debian.guest.osstest.log
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/5508/test-amd64-i386-pair/potato-beetle---var-log-xen-console-guest-debian.guest.osstest.log
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel