Kay, Allen M
2011-Jan-28 02:00 UTC
[Xen-devel] [PATCH][VTD][GFX] pass gfx_passthru parameter to QEMU
Pass gfx_passthru parameter to QEMU. Keep it boolean for now as QEMU does not expect any other integer value. Signed-off-by: Allen Kay <allen.m.kay@intel.com> _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Kay, Allen M
2011-Jan-31 22:40 UTC
[Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH][VTD][GFX] pass gfx_passthru parameter to QEMU
I noticed this pass is has not been checked into the latest staging tree yet. Any reason? -----Original Message----- From: Kay, Allen M Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 6:00 PM To: xen-devel Cc: ''Stefano Stabellini''; Ian Campbell; ''Sergey Tovpeko''; Daniel De Graaf Subject: [PATCH][VTD][GFX] pass gfx_passthru parameter to QEMU Pass gfx_passthru parameter to QEMU. Keep it boolean for now as QEMU does not expect any other integer value. Signed-off-by: Allen Kay <allen.m.kay@intel.com> _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Stefano Stabellini
2011-Feb-01 11:01 UTC
[Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH][VTD][GFX] pass gfx_passthru parameter to QEMU
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011, Kay, Allen M wrote:> I noticed this pass is has not been checked into the latest staging tree yet. Any reason?No reason, with all the other xl patches we just forgot. The patch is fine, but the second chuck is not useful considering that new qemu doesn''t have the code to do gfx passthrough yet. Other than that: Acked-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Ian Jackson
2011-Feb-02 17:08 UTC
[Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH][VTD][GFX] pass gfx_passthru parameter to QEMU
Stefano Stabellini writes ("RE: [PATCH][VTD][GFX] pass gfx_passthru parameter to QEMU"):> On Mon, 31 Jan 2011, Kay, Allen M wrote: > > I noticed this pass is has not been checked into the latest staging tree yet. Any reason? > > No reason, with all the other xl patches we just forgot. > The patch is fine, but the second chuck is not useful considering that > new qemu doesn''t have the code to do gfx passthrough yet. > Other than that:I have applied the whole patch in the hope that the new qemu will grow that code eventually. For now it can be a placeholder and at least it makes things fail properly rather than simply ignoring the passthrough attempt. Sorry for missing the patch the first time round. Part of the reason was that Mailman (our mailing list software) is mangling headers very badly, causing the messages to be rejected by the MTA on my colo so the mail-to-news gateway through which I read xen-devel didn''t see it. Mailman will be too hard to fix quickly so I''ll see about letting my colo''s MTA be a bit more relaxed. Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Maybe Matching Threads
- [RFC][QEMU] ATI graphics VBIOS passthru support
- [VTD][PATCH] a time out mechanism for the shared interrupt issue for vtd
- [PATCH][VTD] pci mmcfg patch for x86-64 - version 2
- [VTD][patch 0/5] HVM device assignment using vt-d
- [PATCH]vtd: Fix for irq bind failure after PCI attaching 32 times