I see new branch (xen/stable) in pv_ops based on 2.6.32.9, is good? for test it there only to change xen/master in xen/stable in buildconfig/mk.linux-2.6-pvops right? I also see update in this page, for use config example for xen/stable i must use "64bit x86_64 (xen/next 2.6.32)"? Why is add CONFIG_XEN_PCIDEV_FRONTEND=y in page but there isn''t in example config? Thanks advance for any reply -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Question-about-xen-stable-branch-in-kernel-pv_ops-tp27714378p27714378.html Sent from the Xen - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Pasi Kärkkäinen
2010-Feb-25 10:09 UTC
Re: [Xen-devel] Question about xen/stable branch in kernel pv_ops
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 12:59:30AM -0800, Fantu wrote:> > I see new branch (xen/stable) in pv_ops based on 2.6.32.9, is good? for test > it there only to change xen/master in xen/stable in buildconfig/mk.linux-2.6-pvops right? >I don''t know what''s the status of xen/stable, I haven''t tried it yet. Maybe Jeremy can comment on that.. You can also clone/checkout and build it separately, no need to build it as part of Xen hypervisor.> I also see update in this page, for use config example for xen/stable i must > use "64bit x86_64 (xen/next 2.6.32)"?> Why is add CONFIG_XEN_PCIDEV_FRONTEND=y in page but there isn''t in example > config? >I assume you''re talking about XenParavirtOps wiki page. I added CONFIG_XEN_PCIDEV_FRONTEND=y there yesterday based on Konrad''s request, but it seems I don''t have it in my example .config files. -- Pasi _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
M A Young
2010-Feb-25 10:56 UTC
Re: [Xen-devel] Question about xen/stable branch in kernel pv_ops
On Thu, 25 Feb 2010, Fantu wrote:> I see new branch (xen/stable) in pv_ops based on 2.6.32.9, is good? for test > it there only to change xen/master in xen/stable in > buildconfig/mk.linux-2.6-pvops right? > I also see update in this page, for use config example for xen/stable i must > use "64bit x86_64 (xen/next 2.6.32)"? > Why is add CONFIG_XEN_PCIDEV_FRONTEND=y in page but there isn''t in example > config?xen/stable seems to be xen/next plus merges up to v2.6.32.9 . I did a build based on it yesterday, and it seems to work the same as xen/next did. Michael Young _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Pasi Kärkkäinen
2010-Feb-25 11:55 UTC
Re: [Xen-devel] Question about xen/stable branch in kernel pv_ops
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 10:56:14AM +0000, M A Young wrote:> On Thu, 25 Feb 2010, Fantu wrote: > >> I see new branch (xen/stable) in pv_ops based on 2.6.32.9, is good? for test >> it there only to change xen/master in xen/stable in >> buildconfig/mk.linux-2.6-pvops right? >> I also see update in this page, for use config example for xen/stable i must >> use "64bit x86_64 (xen/next 2.6.32)"? >> Why is add CONFIG_XEN_PCIDEV_FRONTEND=y in page but there isn''t in example >> config? > > xen/stable seems to be xen/next plus merges up to v2.6.32.9 . I did a > build based on it yesterday, and it seems to work the same as xen/next > did. >Yeah, xen/stable is going to be the ''long term maintained'' branch, based on the long term maintained upstream 2.6.32. See: http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2009-12/msg01127.html -- Pasi _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-Feb-25 16:05 UTC
Re: [Xen-devel] Question about xen/stable branch in kernel pv_ops
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 01:55:39PM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 10:56:14AM +0000, M A Young wrote: > > On Thu, 25 Feb 2010, Fantu wrote: > > > >> I see new branch (xen/stable) in pv_ops based on 2.6.32.9, is good? for test > >> it there only to change xen/master in xen/stable in > >> buildconfig/mk.linux-2.6-pvops right? > >> I also see update in this page, for use config example for xen/stable i must > >> use "64bit x86_64 (xen/next 2.6.32)"? > >> Why is add CONFIG_XEN_PCIDEV_FRONTEND=y in page but there isn''t in example > >> config?That is my fault. I was hoping to have the PCI frontend branch ready by the time Pasi would have added that in (and ask Jeremy to merge it in), but I am still trying to narrow down the list of patches. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-Feb-25 19:05 UTC
Re: [Xen-devel] Question about xen/stable branch in kernel pv_ops
On 02/25/2010 12:59 AM, Fantu wrote:> I see new branch (xen/stable) in pv_ops based on 2.6.32.9, is good? for test > it there only to change xen/master in xen/stable in > buildconfig/mk.linux-2.6-pvops right? > I also see update in this page, for use config example for xen/stable i must > use "64bit x86_64 (xen/next 2.6.32)"? > Why is add CONFIG_XEN_PCIDEV_FRONTEND=y in page but there isn''t in example > config? >xen/stable is still a work in progress, but it should be suitable for general use. It is based on xen/next (which is 2.6.32 based), but it also has the 2.6.32.x stable kernels merged into it. At the moment it is missing a few features compared to xen/master; in particular it is missing PCI passthrough and ACPI power management. This will become a long-term supported Xen kernel (as 2.6.32 is going to be a long-term supported Linux release). There will also be a development tree which tracks ongoing Linux development. J _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Fabio Fantoni
2010-Feb-26 08:30 UTC
Re: [Xen-devel] Question about xen/stable branch in kernel pv_ops
Il 25/02/2010 20:05, Jeremy Fitzhardinge ha scritto:> On 02/25/2010 12:59 AM, Fantu wrote: >> I see new branch (xen/stable) in pv_ops based on 2.6.32.9, is good? >> for test >> it there only to change xen/master in xen/stable in >> buildconfig/mk.linux-2.6-pvops right? >> I also see update in this page, for use config example for xen/stable >> i must >> use "64bit x86_64 (xen/next 2.6.32)"? >> Why is add CONFIG_XEN_PCIDEV_FRONTEND=y in page but there isn''t in >> example >> config? > > xen/stable is still a work in progress, but it should be suitable for > general use. It is based on xen/next (which is 2.6.32 based), but it > also has the 2.6.32.x stable kernels merged into it. > > At the moment it is missing a few features compared to xen/master; in > particular it is missing PCI passthrough and ACPI power management. > > This will become a long-term supported Xen kernel (as 2.6.32 is going > to be a long-term supported Linux release). There will also be a > development tree which tracks ongoing Linux development. > > J > > > > Nessun virus nel messaggio in arrivo. > Controllato da AVG - www.avg.com > Versione: 9.0.733 / Database dei virus: 271.1.1/2709 - Data di rilascio: 02/25/10 08:34:00 > >I have try to change xen/master in xen/stable or xen/next but give error: error: pathspec ''xen/stable'' did not match any file(s) known to git. error: pathspec ''xen/next'' did not match any file(s) known to git. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Pasi Kärkkäinen
2010-Feb-26 08:42 UTC
Re: [Xen-devel] Question about xen/stable branch in kernel pv_ops
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 09:30:15AM +0100, Fabio Fantoni wrote:> Il 25/02/2010 20:05, Jeremy Fitzhardinge ha scritto: > > On 02/25/2010 12:59 AM, Fantu wrote: > > I see new branch (xen/stable) in pv_ops based on 2.6.32.9, is good? > for test > it there only to change xen/master in xen/stable in > buildconfig/mk.linux-2.6-pvops right? > I also see update in this page, for use config example for xen/stable > i must > use "64bit x86_64 (xen/next 2.6.32)"? > Why is add CONFIG_XEN_PCIDEV_FRONTEND=y in page but there isn''t in > example > config? > > > xen/stable is still a work in progress, but it should be suitable for > general use. It is based on xen/next (which is 2.6.32 based), but it > also has the 2.6.32.x stable kernels merged into it. > > At the moment it is missing a few features compared to xen/master; in > particular it is missing PCI passthrough and ACPI power management. > > This will become a long-term supported Xen kernel (as 2.6.32 is going to > be a long-term supported Linux release). There will also be a > development tree which tracks ongoing Linux development. > > J > > > > Nessun virus nel messaggio in arrivo. > Controllato da AVG - [1]www.avg.com > Versione: 9.0.733 / Database dei virus: 271.1.1/2709 - Data di rilascio: 02/25/10 08:34:00 > > > > I have try to change xen/master in xen/stable or xen/next but give error: > error: pathspec ''xen/stable'' did not match any file(s) known to git. > error: pathspec ''xen/next'' did not match any file(s) known to git. >git pull git reset --hard git checkout -b xen/stable origin/xen/stable git pull and verify the changelog with "git log" and compare to output from: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.git;a=shortlog;h=xen/stable -- Pasi _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Fantu
2010-Mar-01 07:28 UTC
Re: [Xen-devel] Question about xen/stable branch in kernel pv_ops
Now with config example in wiki page do very big modules and initrd, is possible do same config without only not necessary for do more small? Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:> > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 09:30:15AM +0100, Fabio Fantoni wrote: >> Il 25/02/2010 20:05, Jeremy Fitzhardinge ha scritto: >> >> On 02/25/2010 12:59 AM, Fantu wrote: >> >> I see new branch (xen/stable) in pv_ops based on 2.6.32.9, is >> good? >> for test >> it there only to change xen/master in xen/stable in >> buildconfig/mk.linux-2.6-pvops right? >> I also see update in this page, for use config example for >> xen/stable >> i must >> use "64bit x86_64 (xen/next 2.6.32)"? >> Why is add CONFIG_XEN_PCIDEV_FRONTEND=y in page but there isn''t in >> example >> config? >> >> >> xen/stable is still a work in progress, but it should be suitable >> for >> general use. It is based on xen/next (which is 2.6.32 based), but >> it >> also has the 2.6.32.x stable kernels merged into it. >> >> At the moment it is missing a few features compared to xen/master; >> in >> particular it is missing PCI passthrough and ACPI power management. >> >> This will become a long-term supported Xen kernel (as 2.6.32 is >> going to >> be a long-term supported Linux release). There will also be a >> development tree which tracks ongoing Linux development. >> >> J >> >> >> >> Nessun virus nel messaggio in arrivo. >> Controllato da AVG - [1]www.avg.com >> Versione: 9.0.733 / Database dei virus: 271.1.1/2709 - Data di >> rilascio: 02/25/10 08:34:00 >> >> >> >> I have try to change xen/master in xen/stable or xen/next but give >> error: >> error: pathspec ''xen/stable'' did not match any file(s) known to git. >> error: pathspec ''xen/next'' did not match any file(s) known to git. >> > > git pull > git reset --hard > git checkout -b xen/stable origin/xen/stable > git pull > > and verify the changelog with "git log" and compare to output from: > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.git;a=shortlog;h=xen/stable > > -- Pasi > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel > >-- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Question-about-xen-stable-branch-in-kernel-pv_ops-tp27714378p27740714.html Sent from the Xen - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel