Folks, The first release candidate for Xen 3.4.0 is available at http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-unstable.hg, tagged as ''3.4.0-rc1''. Please test! -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Boris Derzhavets
2009-Apr-10 12:20 UTC
Re: [Xen-devel] First release candidate for Xen 3.4.0
Do you expect stubdom in the most recent Xen Unstable ( changeset 19534)
to work with xen-ified kernel different from 2.6.18-xen ?
I''ve got same negative results for Suse''s 2.6.27.5 kernel as a
month before.
Boris
--- On Fri, 4/10/09, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: [Xen-devel] First release candidate for Xen 3.4.0
To: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com"
<xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Date: Friday, April 10, 2009, 2:25 AM
Folks,
The first release candidate for Xen 3.4.0 is available at
http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-unstable.hg, tagged as
''3.4.0-rc1''.
Please test!
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
What situation do you mean? HVM guest running with stubdom while dom0 is running 2.6.27.5 kernel? I wouldn¹t expect dom0 kernel version to much affect stubdom, since stubdom actually should make the qemu bits much less dependent on dom0. -- Keir On 10/04/2009 13:20, "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@yahoo.com> wrote:> Do you expect stubdom in the most recent Xen Unstable ( changeset 19534) > to work with xen-ified kernel different from 2.6.18-xen ? > I''ve got same negative results for Suse''s 2.6.27.5 kernel as a month before. > Boris > > --- On Fri, 4/10/09, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com> wrote: >> From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com> >> Subject: [Xen-devel] First release candidate for Xen 3.4.0 >> To: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> >> Date: Friday, April 10, 2009, 2:25 AM >> >> Folks, >> >> The first release candidate for Xen 3.4.0 is available at >> http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-unstable.hg, tagged as ''3.4.0-rc1''. >> >> Please test! >> >> -- >> Keir >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Xen-devel mailing list >> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com >> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel > >_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Boris Derzhavets
2009-Apr-10 13:46 UTC
Re: [Xen-devel] First release candidate for Xen 3.4.0
Current environment:- root@Server1:/etc/xen# xm info host : Server1 release : 2.6.27.5 version : #2 SMP Sat Feb 14 13:48:51 EST 2009 machine : x86_64 nr_cpus : 2 nr_nodes : 1 cores_per_socket : 2 threads_per_core : 1 cpu_mhz : 3005 hw_caps : bfebfbff:20100800:00000000:00000140:0008e3fd:00000000:00000001:00000000 virt_caps : hvm total_memory : 8191 free_memory : 1071 node_to_cpu : node0:0-1 node_to_memory : node0:1071 xen_major : 3 xen_minor : 4 xen_extra : .0-rc2-pre xen_caps : xen-3.0-x86_64 xen-3.0-x86_32p hvm-3.0-x86_32 hvm-3.0-x86_32p hvm-3.0-x86_64 xen_scheduler : credit xen_pagesize : 4096 platform_params : virt_start=0xffff800000000000 xen_changeset : Fri Apr 10 06:58:04 2009 +0100 19534:120d3c67951b cc_compiler : gcc version 4.3.2 (Ubuntu 4.3.2-1ubuntu12) cc_compile_by : root cc_compile_domain : cc_compile_date : Fri Apr 10 08:07:06 EDT 2009 xend_config_format : 4 Start # /usr/sbin/fs-backend & Have two files under /etc/xen for RHEL stub domain Fisrt:- root@Server1:/etc/xen# cat RHELhvm-stubdom kernel = "/usr/lib/xen/boot/hvmloader" builder=''hvm'' memory =1024 name = "RHELhvm" vif = [ ''type=ioemu, bridge=eth0'' ] device_model = "/usr/lib/xen/bin/stubdom-dm" boot="d" sdl=0 opengl=0 vnc=0 stdvga=0 Second:- root@Server1:/etc/xen# cat RHELhvm-dm kernel = "/usr/lib/xen/boot/ioemu-stubdom.gz" vif = [ '' '', ''bridge=eth0''] # vfb = [ ''type=sdl'' ] vfb = [ ''type=vnc'' ] disk = [''phy:/dev/loop0,hdc:cdrom,r'',''phy:/dev/sdb8,hda,w''] root@Server1:/etc/xen# losetup -a /dev/loop0: [081e]:2510141 (/home/boris/isos/rhel.iso) root@Server1:/etc/xen# xm create RHELhvm-stubdom Using config file "./RHELhvm-stubdom". Started domain RHELhvm (id=4) root@Server1:/etc/xen# xm list Name ID Mem VCPUs State Time(s) Domain-0 0 7019 2 r----- 278.0 RHELhvm 4 1024 1 ------ 0.0 root@Server1:/etc/xen# netstat -a|grep 590 tcp 0 0 *:5901 *:* LISTEN Nothing at 5900 Stub Domain fails to start . Boris. --- On Fri, 4/10/09, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com> wrote: From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] First release candidate for Xen 3.4.0 To: "bderzhavets@yahoo.com" <bderzhavets@yahoo.com>, "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> Date: Friday, April 10, 2009, 9:00 AM What situation do you mean? HVM guest running with stubdom while dom0 is running 2.6.27.5 kernel? I wouldn¹t expect dom0 kernel version to much affect stubdom, since stubdom actually should make the qemu bits much less dependent on dom0. -- Keir On 10/04/2009 13:20, "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@yahoo.com> wrote:> Do you expect stubdom in the most recent Xen Unstable ( changeset 19534) > to work with xen-ified kernel different from 2.6.18-xen ? > I''ve got same negative results for Suse''s 2.6.27.5 kernel as amonth before.> Boris > > --- On Fri, 4/10/09, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com> wrote: >> From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com> >> Subject: [Xen-devel] First release candidate for Xen 3.4.0 >> To: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com"<xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>>> Date: Friday, April 10, 2009, 2:25 AM >> >> Folks, >> >> The first release candidate for Xen 3.4.0 is available at >> http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-unstable.hg, tagged as''3.4.0-rc1''.>> >> Please test! >> >> -- >> Keir >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Xen-devel mailing list >> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com >> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel > >_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
On 4/10/09, Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@yahoo.com> wrote:> > root@Server1:/etc/xen# xm create RHELhvm-stubdom > Using config file "./RHELhvm-stubdom". > Started domain RHELhvm (id=4) > > root@Server1:/etc/xen# xm list > Name ID Mem VCPUs State Time(s) > Domain-0 0 7019 2 r----- 278.0 > RHELhvm 4 1024 1 ------ 0.0 > > root@Server1:/etc/xen# netstat -a|grep 590 > tcp 0 0 *:5901 *:* LISTEN > > Nothing at 5900 > Stub Domain fails to start . >I have the same symptoms on xen-3.4.0-rc1 and 2.6.18.8-xen. Keith Coleman _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
On 10/04/2009 21:22, "Keith Coleman" <list.keith@scaltro.com> wrote:>> root@Server1:/etc/xen# netstat -a|grep 590 >> tcp 0 0 *:5901 *:* LISTEN >> >> Nothing at 5900 >> Stub Domain fails to start . >> > > I have the same symptoms on xen-3.4.0-rc1 and 2.6.18.8-xen.This is a known issue being looked into. It basically means that stubdoms do not work in -rc1. -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
2009/4/10 Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>:> The first release candidate for Xen 3.4.0 is available at > http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-unstable.hg, tagged as ''3.4.0-rc1''.I wonder how many more eyeballs for testing you''d get, if you released -rc binaries for e.g. most recent centOS? Or talked nicely to Sascha at gitco.de ... _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Thiago Camargo Martins Cordeiro
2009-Apr-14 18:11 UTC
Re: [Xen-devel] First release candidate for Xen 3.4.0
There is no tarball for -rc releases? 2009/4/14 Andy Burns <xen.lists@burns.me.uk>> 2009/4/10 Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>: > > > The first release candidate for Xen 3.4.0 is available at > > http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-unstable.hg, tagged as ''3.4.0-rc1''. > > I wonder how many more eyeballs for testing you''d get, if you released > -rc binaries for e.g. most recent centOS? > > Or talked nicely to Sascha at gitco.de ... > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel >_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Thiago Camargo Martins Cordeiro writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] First release
candidate for Xen 3.4.0"):> There is no tarball for -rc releases?
Indeed. Is there much demand ? We could provide tarballs quite
easily if people want.
> 2009/4/14 Andy Burns <xen.lists@burns.me.uk>
> > I wonder how many more eyeballs for testing you''d get, if you
released
> > -rc binaries for e.g. most recent centOS?
Last time I produced binary packages it was a good deal of effort
wrestling the various package building systems and I''m not really sure
the results were that good anyway. So we''re not planning on doing
those I''m afraid.
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel