Pasi Kärkkäinen
2009-Mar-25 15:34 UTC
[Xen-devel] Success with recent Xen pv_ops dom0 kernel (2.6.29-rc8)
Hello! In addition to all the nagging about bugs I decided to report some positive stuff too :) My current pv_ops dom0 testbox seems to work pretty well. It''s Linux 2.6.29-rc8 based, built last saturday (2009-03-21). I''m running 32bit PAE pv_ops dom0 kernel on some older Intel P4 machine, which doesn''t have HVM (Intel VT) support. So I can''t test HVM guests. Things that work based on my testing: - "xm info" - "xm list" - "xm create" <- PV domU, LVM volume as disk, bridged network, VNC console - "xm destroy" - "virt-install" to install new guests - "virt-manager" to manage and install new guests - "virsh" to manage guests I successfully ran and installed CentOS 5.3 domU, Fedora 10 domU, and Fedora 11 (rawhide) domU. I''m able to run multiple PV guests at the same time.. No crashes or anything weird based on a couple of hours of testing. Things that are still broken: - dom0 VGA text console doesn''t work, only serial console works - CONFIG_HIGHPTE=y crashes the dom0 kernel sooner or later, so I''m running CONFIG_HIGHPTE=n Otherwise my setup consists of: - Fedora 10 distribution on dom0, latest updates installed - libvirt 0.6.1 and related packages from f10 updates-testing (earlier versions had a lot of problems) - F11/rawhide Xen 3.3.1-9 packages rebuilt for F10 - New enough pv_ops dom0 kernel so it has /sys/hypervisor support for libvirt/virt-install/virt-manager Missing features: - blktap (tap:aio). Any plans for this? - PV domU PCI-passthrough? Congratulations and thanks to Jeremy (and others) for the hard work so far! -- Pasi _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Pasi Kärkkäinen
2009-Mar-25 15:37 UTC
Re: [Xen-devel] Success with recent Xen pv_ops dom0 kernel (2.6.29-rc8)
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 05:34:06PM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:> Hello! > > In addition to all the nagging about bugs I decided to report some positive > stuff too :) > > My current pv_ops dom0 testbox seems to work pretty well. It''s Linux 2.6.29-rc8 > based, built last saturday (2009-03-21). I''m running 32bit PAE pv_ops dom0 kernel > on some older Intel P4 machine, which doesn''t have HVM (Intel VT) support. > So I can''t test HVM guests. > > Things that work based on my testing: > - "xm info" > - "xm list" > - "xm create" <- PV domU, LVM volume as disk, bridged network, VNC console > - "xm destroy"- "xm reboot" - "xm shutdown" - "xm console" Those do work aswell, just forgot about them. -- Pasi _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Boris Derzhavets
2009-Mar-25 17:27 UTC
Re: [Xen-devel] Success with recent Xen pv_ops dom0 kernel (2.6.29-rc8)
>So I can''t test HVM guestsLucky you. Boris. --- On Wed, 3/25/09, Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@iki.fi> wrote: From: Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@iki.fi> Subject: [Xen-devel] Success with recent Xen pv_ops dom0 kernel (2.6.29-rc8) To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com Date: Wednesday, March 25, 2009, 11:34 AM Hello! In addition to all the nagging about bugs I decided to report some positive stuff too :) My current pv_ops dom0 testbox seems to work pretty well. It''s Linux 2.6.29-rc8 based, built last saturday (2009-03-21). I''m running 32bit PAE pv_ops dom0 kernel on some older Intel P4 machine, which doesn''t have HVM (Intel VT) support. So I can''t test HVM guests. Things that work based on my testing: - "xm info" - "xm list" - "xm create" <- PV domU, LVM volume as disk, bridged network, VNC console - "xm destroy" - "virt-install" to install new guests - "virt-manager" to manage and install new guests - "virsh" to manage guests I successfully ran and installed CentOS 5.3 domU, Fedora 10 domU, and Fedora 11 (rawhide) domU. I''m able to run multiple PV guests at the same time.. No crashes or anything weird based on a couple of hours of testing. Things that are still broken: - dom0 VGA text console doesn''t work, only serial console works - CONFIG_HIGHPTE=y crashes the dom0 kernel sooner or later, so I''m running CONFIG_HIGHPTE=n Otherwise my setup consists of: - Fedora 10 distribution on dom0, latest updates installed - libvirt 0.6.1 and related packages from f10 updates-testing (earlier versions had a lot of problems) - F11/rawhide Xen 3.3.1-9 packages rebuilt for F10 - New enough pv_ops dom0 kernel so it has /sys/hypervisor support for libvirt/virt-install/virt-manager Missing features: - blktap (tap:aio). Any plans for this? - PV domU PCI-passthrough? Congratulations and thanks to Jeremy (and others) for the hard work so far! -- Pasi _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-Mar-25 18:04 UTC
Re: [Xen-devel] Success with recent Xen pv_ops dom0 kernel (2.6.29-rc8)
Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:> Things that are still broken: > - dom0 VGA text console doesn''t work, only serial console works >OK, Gerd identified a mapping problem that probably explains the lack of VGA. I haven''t had a chance to cook up a fix for it yet.> - CONFIG_HIGHPTE=y crashes the dom0 kernel sooner or later, so I''m running CONFIG_HIGHPTE=n >It''s possible this is related. Well, it would be nice ;)> Otherwise my setup consists of: > - Fedora 10 distribution on dom0, latest updates installed > - libvirt 0.6.1 and related packages from f10 updates-testing (earlier versions had a lot of problems) > - F11/rawhide Xen 3.3.1-9 packages rebuilt for F10 > - New enough pv_ops dom0 kernel so it has /sys/hypervisor support for libvirt/virt-install/virt-manager > > Missing features: > - blktap (tap:aio). Any plans for this? > - PV domU PCI-passthrough? >Yes, both are planned. blktap is on a fairly short list (waiting for blktap2 to land, rather than waste time on blktap1). I think a lot of the tricky bits PCI passthrough are already done in the form of the rest of the dom0 pci changes, but I haven''t looked at pciback in detail yet. J _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel